Literature DB >> 25040835

Impact of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears at first birth on subsequent pregnancy outcomes: a cohort study.

L C Edozien1, I Gurol-Urganci, D A Cromwell, E J Adams, D H Richmond, T A Mahmood, J H van der Meulen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate, among women who have had a third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, the mode of delivery in subsequent pregnancies as well as the recurrence rate of third- or fourth-degree tears.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of deliveries using a national administrative database.
SETTING: The English National Health Service between 1 April 2004 and 31 March 2012. POPULATION: A total of 639,402 primiparous women who had a singleton, term, vaginal live birth between April 2004 and March 2011, and a second birth before April 2012.
METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios, adjusted for other risk factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mode of delivery and recurrence of tears at second birth.
RESULTS: The rate of elective caesarean at second birth was 24.2% for women with a third- or fourth-degree tear at first birth, and 1.5% for women without (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 18.3, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 16.4-20.4). Among women who had a vaginal delivery at second birth, the rate of third- or fourth-degree tears was 7.2% for women with a third- or fourth-degree tear at first birth, compared with 1.3% for women without (aOR 5.5, 95% CI 5.2-5.9).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of a severe perineal tear is increased five-fold in women who had a third- or fourth-degree tear in their first delivery. This increased risk should be taken into account when decisions about mode of delivery are made.
© 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Administrative data; caesarean section; severe perineal trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25040835     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  13 in total

1.  Reducing obstetric anal sphincter injuries using perineal support: our preliminary experience.

Authors:  Madhu Naidu; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review of information available on the internet.

Authors:  Vishalli Ghai; Vasilios Pergialiotis; Haider Jan; James M N Duffy; Stergios K Doumouchtsis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Antepartum use of Epi-No birth trainer for preventing perineal trauma: systematic review.

Authors:  Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito; Cristine Homsi Jorge Ferreira; Geraldo Duarte; Antonio Alberto Nogueira; Alessandra Cristina Marcolin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Associations Between Maternal Obesity and Race, with Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kelly Yamasato; Chieko Kimata; Janet M Burlingame
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2019-01

Review 5.  Evidence-Based Update on Treatments of Fecal Incontinence in Women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Impact of electronic and blended learning programs for manual perineal support on incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a prospective interventional study.

Authors:  Hadil Ali-Masri; Sahar Hassan; Erik Fosse; Kaled M Zimmo; Mohammed Zimmo; Khaled M K Ismail; Åse Vikanes; Katariina Laine
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  The impact of first birth obstetric anal sphincter injury on the subsequent birth: a population-based linkage study.

Authors:  Amanda J Ampt; Christine L Roberts; Jonathan M Morris; Jane B Ford
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Swati Jha; Victoria Parker
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Incidence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries after Various Modes of Vaginal Deliveries in Chinese Women.

Authors:  Chi Wai Tung; Willy Cecilia Cheon; Wai Mei Anny Tong; Hau Yee Leung
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Effect of subsequent vaginal delivery on bowel symptoms and anorectal function in women who sustained a previous obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Polly A Jordan; Madhu Naidu; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.