Literature DB >> 25040506

Fine- and coarse-filter conservation strategies in a time of climate change.

Morgan W Tingley1, Emily S Darling, David S Wilcove.   

Abstract

As species adapt to a changing climate, so too must humans adapt to a new conservation landscape. Classical frameworks have distinguished between fine- and coarse-filter conservation strategies, focusing on conserving either the species or the landscapes, respectively, that together define extant biodiversity. Adapting this framework for climate change, conservationists are using fine-filter strategies to assess species vulnerability and prioritize the most vulnerable species for conservation actions. Coarse-filter strategies seek to conserve either key sites as determined by natural elements unaffected by climate change, or sites with low climate velocity that are expected to be refugia for climate-displaced species. Novel approaches combine coarse- and fine-scale approaches--for example, prioritizing species within pretargeted landscapes--and accommodate the difficult reality of multiple interacting stressors. By taking a diversified approach to conservation actions and decisions, conservationists can hedge against uncertainty, take advantage of new methods and information, and tailor actions to the unique needs and limitations of places, thereby ensuring that the biodiversity show will go on.
© 2014 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; conservation; multiple stressors; prioritization; vulnerability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25040506     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  9 in total

1.  A functional perspective on the analysis of land use and land cover data in ecology.

Authors:  Federico Riva; Scott E Nielsen
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Reserve Design under Climate Change: From Land Facets Back to Ecosystem Representation.

Authors:  Richard R Schneider; Erin M Bayne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Biotic and Climatic Velocity Identify Contrasting Areas of Vulnerability to Climate Change.

Authors:  Carlos Carroll; Joshua J Lawler; David R Roberts; Andreas Hamann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Conserving plants within and beyond protected areas - still problematic and future uncertain.

Authors:  Vernon H Heywood
Journal:  Plant Divers       Date:  2018-10-23

Review 5.  Rewilding in the face of climate change.

Authors:  Carlos Carroll; Reed F Noss
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Modeling of Valeriana wallichii Habitat Suitability and Niche Dynamics in the Himalayan Region under Anticipated Climate Change.

Authors:  Priyanka Kumari; Ishfaq Ahmad Wani; Sajid Khan; Susheel Verma; Shazia Mushtaq; Aneela Gulnaz; Bilal Ahamad Paray
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24

7.  Planning for resilience: Incorporating scenario and model uncertainty and trade-offs when prioritizing management of climate refugia.

Authors:  Iliana Chollett; Ximena Escovar-Fadul; Steven R Schill; Aldo Croquer; Adele M Dixon; Maria Beger; Elizabeth Shaver; Valerie Pietsch McNulty; Nicholas H Wolff
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 13.211

8.  Climate change adaptation benefits of potential conservation partnerships.

Authors:  William B Monahan; David M Theobald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Keeping pace with climate change in global terrestrial protected areas.

Authors:  Paul R Elsen; William B Monahan; Eric R Dougherty; Adina M Merenlender
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 14.957

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.