Literature DB >> 25040497

In intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: radioembolization with yttrium 90 or chemoembolization?

Amr El Fouly1, Judith Ertle, Ahmed El Dorry, Mohamed K Shaker, Alexander Dechêne, Heba Abdella, Stefan Mueller, Eman Barakat, Thomas Lauenstein, Andreas Bockisch, Guido Gerken, Joerg F Schlaak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is one of the standard treatments recommended for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). At the same time, only little is known about the use of radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres (TARE Y-90) for this subset of patients. To perform comparative analysis between both locoregional therapies in intermediate HCCs. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while safety, response rate and time-to-progression (TTP) were considered as secondary endpoints.
METHODS: We collected data of 86 HCC patients in two university hospitals at which conventional TACE with doxorubicin or TARE Y-90 using glass microspheres were performed. The median observation period was 10 months. Patients were followed up for signs of toxicity and response. They underwent imaging analysis at baseline and follow-up at regular time intervals.
RESULTS: Eighty-six HCC patients with intermediate stage B (BCLC) were treated with either TACE (n = 42) or TARE Y-90 (n = 44). Despite a higher tumour burden in the TARE Y-90 group, the median OS (TACE: 18 months vs. TARE Y-90: 16.4 months) and the median TTP (TACE: 6.8 months vs. TARE Y-90: 13.3 months) were not statistically different. The number of treatment sessions, the average rate of treatment sessions per patient, total hospitalization time and rate of adverse events were significantly higher in the TACE cohort.
CONCLUSION: In intermediate HCC stage patients, both treatments resulted in similar survival probabilities despite more advanced disease in the TARE Y-90 group. Still, TARE Y-90 was better tolerated and associated with less hospitalization and treatment sessions.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCLC Stage B; Chemoembolization; Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Intermediate Stage HCC; Radioembolization; TACE; TARE; Yttrium 90

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25040497     DOI: 10.1111/liv.12637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Int        ISSN: 1478-3223            Impact factor:   5.828


  36 in total

Review 1.  Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Julien Edeline; Marine Gilabert; Etienne Garin; Eveline Boucher; Jean-Luc Raoul
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.740

2.  Meta-analysis: adjusted indirect comparison of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization versus 90Y-radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Johannes M Ludwig; Di Zhang; Minzhi Xing; Hyun S Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Transarterial radioembolization vs chemoembolization for hepatocarcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Facciorusso; Gaetano Serviddio; Nicola Muscatiello
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 4.  Interventional Oncology in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Progress Through Innovation.

Authors:  Lin Mu; Julius Chapiro; Jeremiah Stringam; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  In situ forming implants exposed to ultrasound enhance therapeutic efficacy in subcutaneous murine tumors.

Authors:  Selva Jeganathan; Emily Budziszewski; Peter Bielecki; Michael C Kolios; Agata A Exner
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Yttrium-90 radioembolization treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-centre prognostic factors analysis.

Authors:  C Floridi; F Pesapane; S A Angileri; D De Palma; F Fontana; F Caspani; A Barile; A Del Sole; C Masciocchi; G Lucignani; G Carrafiello
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  Management strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma: old certainties and new realities.

Authors:  Gianluigi Mazzoccoli; Roberto Tarquini; Alice Valoriani; Jude Oben; Manlio Vinciguerra; Fabio Marra
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 8.  Effects of Yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy on non-conventional liver tumors.

Authors:  Andrew Kuei; Sammy Saab; Sung-Ki Cho; Stephen T Kee; Edward Wolfgang Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Transarterial chemoembolization versus transarterial radioembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: optimization of selecting treatment modality.

Authors:  Do Young Kim; Kwang-Hyub Han
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 6.047

10.  Intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of transarterial therapy.

Authors:  Fabrizio Chegai; Antonio Orlacchio; Stefano Merolla; Serena Monti; Lorenzo Mannelli
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.