Literature DB >> 25040430

Evaluation of the Sherlock 3CG Tip Confirmation System on peripherally inserted central catheter malposition rates.

A J Johnston1, A Holder, S M Bishop, T C See, C T Streater.   

Abstract

Peripherally inserted central catheters are often positioned blindly in the central circulation, and this may result in high malposition rates, especially in critically ill patients. Recently, a new technology has been introduced (Sherlock 3CG Tip Positioning System) that uses an electro-magnetic system to guide positioning in the superior vena cava, and then intra-cavity ECG to guide positioning at the cavo-atrial junction. In this observational study, we investigated how the Sherlock 3CG Tip Positioning System would affect peripherally inserted central catheter malposition rates, defined using a post-insertion chest radiograph, in critically ill patients. A total of 239 catheters positioned using the Sherlock 3CG Tip Positioning System were analysed. When an adequate position was defined as low superior vena cava or cavo-atrial junction, 134 catheters (56.1%; 95% CI 50-62%) were malpositioned. When an adequate position was defined as mid/low superior vena cava, cavo-atrial junction or high right atrium (≤ 2 cm from cavo-atrial junction), 49 (20.5%; 95% CI 16-26%) catheters were malpositioned. These malposition rates are significantly lower than our own historical data, which used a 'blind' anthropometric technique to guide peripherally inserted central catheter insertion.
© 2014 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25040430     DOI: 10.1111/anae.12785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  14 in total

1.  Radiologist variability in assessing the position of the cavoatrial junction on chest radiographs.

Authors:  Tze Y Chan; Andrew England; Sara M Meredith; Richard G McWilliams
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Tip malposition of peripherally inserted central catheters: a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare bedside insertion to fluoroscopically guided placement.

Authors:  Frédéric Glauser; Stephane Breault; Fabio Rigamonti; Charalampos Sotiriadis; Anne-Marie Jouannic; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Tricuspid valve vegetation related to leaflet injury: a unique problem of catheter malposition.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Hongxia Wang; Yun Mou; Shenjiang Hu
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 1.167

4.  Sherlock 3CG(®) Tip Confirmation System for Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.

Authors:  Megan Dale; Ailish Higgins; Grace Carolan-Rees
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.561

5.  Superior success rate of intracavitary electrocardiogram guidance for peripherally inserted central catheter placement in patients with cancer: A randomized open-label controlled multicenter study.

Authors:  Ling Yuan; Rongmei Li; Aifeng Meng; Yuling Feng; Xiancui Wu; Yiqun Yang; Ping Chen; Zhenzhu Qiu; Jing Qi; Chuanying Chen; Jia Wei; Minyi Qin; Weiwei Kong; Xiangyu Chen; Wei Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Time and resources of peripherally inserted central catheter insertion procedures: a comparison between blind insertion/chest X-ray and a real time tip navigation and confirmation system.

Authors:  Kenneth J Tomaszewski; Nicole Ferko; Sarah S Hollmann; Simona C Eng; Howard M Richard; Lynn Rowe; Susan Sproule
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2017-02-07

7.  Clinical impact of the Sherlock 3CG® Tip Confirmation System for peripherally inserted central catheters.

Authors:  Tomomi Yamagishi; Hirokazu Ashida; Takao Igarashi; Yo Matsui; Yosuke Nozawa; Takahiro Higuchi; Hiroya Ojiri
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Clinical feasibility and effectiveness of bedside peripherally inserted central catheter using portable digital radiography for patients in an intensive care unit: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Soo Buem Cho; Hye Jin Baek; Sung Eun Park; Ho Cheol Choi; Sang Min Lee; Kyungsoo Bae; Kyung Nyeo Jeon; Kyeong Hwa Ryu; Jin Il Moon; Bo Hwa Choi; Ji Young Ha
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Comparing the accuracy and complications of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement using fluoroscopic and the blind pushing technique.

Authors:  Brendan Erskine; Pierre Bradley; Tim Joseph; Sabrina Yeh; Warren Clements
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2021-08-03

10.  Dose Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Precisely Predict Catheter Tip Location via Superior Vena Cava Route?

Authors:  Ching-Yang Wu; Jui-Ying Fu; Ching-Feng Wu; Po-Jen Ko; Yun-Hen Liu; Tsung-Chi Kao; Shang-Yueh Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.