Literature DB >> 25040311

Outcome and management of pacemaker-induced superior vena cava syndrome.

Hai-Xia Fu1, Xin-Miao Huang, Li Zhong, Michael J Osborn, Haraldur Bjarnason, Siva Mulpuru, Xian-Xian Zhao, Paul A Friedman, Yong-Mei Cha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the long-term outcomes of percutaneous lead extraction and stent placement in patients with pacemaker-induced superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome.
METHODS: The study retrospectively screened patients who underwent lead extraction followed by central vein stent implantation at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA), from January 2005 to December 2012, to identify the patients with pacemaker-induced SVC syndrome. Demographic, clinical, and follow-up characteristics of those patients were collected from electronic medical records.
RESULTS: Six cases were identified. The mean (standard deviation) age was 56 (15) years (male, 67%). All patients had permanent dual-chamber pacemakers, with a mean 11-year history of pacemaker placement. The entire device system was explanted in five patients; one patient had a 21-year-old pacemaker lead that could not be removed. Eight stents were implanted in six patients: five patients had one stent, one patient had three. A new pacemaker system was reimplanted through the stented vein in five patients. Technical success was achieved in all patients, without any complication. Symptoms rapidly resolved in all patients after stent deployment. The mean follow-up duration was 48 months (range, 10-100 months). Three patients remained symptom free. Reintervention with percutaneous balloon venoplasty was successful in three patients with symptom recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous stent implantation after lead removal followed by reimplantation of leads is a feasible alternative therapy for pacemaker-induced SVC syndrome, although some cases may require repeat intervention. ©2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lead extraction; pacemaker; superior vena cava syndrome; venous stenting

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25040311     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  8 in total

1.  Unique clinical presentation and management of lead-stent abrasion.

Authors:  Salil Desai; James E Ip; Akhilesh K Sista; Quynh A Truong; Bruce B Lerman; Jim W Cheung
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2017-12-11

2.  Change from Cardioinhibitory Syncope to Iatrogenic Positional Syncope: Superior Vena Cava Syndrome Treated by Superior Vena Cava Stenting and Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.

Authors:  Firdevs A Ekizler; Ozcan Ozeke; Riza S Okten; Emek Edipoglu; Firat Ozcan; Serkan Cay; Serkan Topaloglu; Dursun Aras
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2018-09-15

3.  Inferior vena cava-right atrial junction stenosis requiring a multidisciplinary approach to resection and reconstruction.

Authors:  Shane P Smith; Caleb G Van Essen; Adam H Zivin; P Gregory Hayes; Evan S Ong; Eric J Lehr
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-10-23

Review 4.  New Insights in Central Venous Disorders. The Role of Transvenous Lead Extractions.

Authors:  Giulia Domenichini; Mathieu Le Bloa; Patrice Carroz; Denis Graf; Claudia Herrera-Siklody; Cheryl Teres; Alessandra Pia Porretta; Patrizio Pascale; Etienne Pruvot
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-23

5.  ICD Leads Extraction and Clearing of Access Way in a Patient With Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: Building A Tunnel.

Authors:  Márcio Galindo Kiuchi; Ricardo Luiz Lima Andrade; Gustavo Ramalho da Silva; Hanry Barros Souto; Shaojie Chen; Humberto Villacorta Junior
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Surgical patch venoplasty after unsuccessful percutaneous balloon venoplasty for pacemaker lead-related superior vena cava stenosis.

Authors:  Dhaval Desai; Ryan Cooley; David Kress; Suhail Q Allaqaband
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2018-02-06

7.  Commentary: SVC syndrome: Venous stenting is the mainstay but may not stay open.

Authors:  Adam P Johnson; Virendra Patel; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-10-10

8.  2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Maully J Shah; Michael J Silka; Jennifer N Avari Silva; Seshadri Balaji; Cheyenne M Beach; Monica N Benjamin; Charles I Berul; Bryan Cannon; Frank Cecchin; Mitchell I Cohen; Aarti S Dalal; Brynn E Dechert; Anne Foster; Roman Gebauer; M Cecilia Gonzalez Corcia; Prince J Kannankeril; Peter P Karpawich; Jeffery J Kim; Mani Ram Krishna; Peter Kubuš; Martin J LaPage; Douglas Y Mah; Lindsey Malloy-Walton; Aya Miyazaki; Kara S Motonaga; Mary C Niu; Melissa Olen; Thomas Paul; Eric Rosenthal; Elizabeth V Saarel; Massimo Stefano Silvetti; Elizabeth A Stephenson; Reina B Tan; John Triedman; Nicholas H Von Bergen; Philip L Wackel
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-07-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.