Literature DB >> 25040006

Men's strategic preferences for femininity in female faces.

Anthony C Little1, Benedict C Jones, David R Feinberg, David I Perrett.   

Abstract

Several evolutionarily relevant sources of individual differences in face preference have been documented for women. Here, we examine three such sources of individual variation in men's preference for female facial femininity: term of relationship, partnership status and self-perceived attractiveness. We show that men prefer more feminine female faces when rating for a short-term relationship and when they have a partner (Study 1). These variables were found to interact in a follow-up study (Study 2). Men who thought themselves attractive also preferred more feminized female faces for short-term relationships than men who thought themselves less attractive (Study 1 and Study 2). In women, similar findings for masculine preferences in male faces have been interpreted as adaptive. In men, such preferences potentially reflect that attractive males are able to compete for high-quality female partners in short-term contexts. When a man has secured a mate, the potential cost of being discovered may increase his choosiness regarding short-term partners relative to unpartnered men, who can better increase their short-term mating success by relaxing their standards. Such potentially strategic preferences imply that men also face trade-offs when choosing relatively masculine or feminine faced partners. In line with a trade-off, women with feminine faces were seen as more likely to be unfaithful and more likely to pursue short-term relationships (Study 3), suggesting that risk of cuckoldry is one factor that may limit men's preferences for femininity in women and could additionally lead to preferences for femininity in short-term mates.
© 2013 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 25040006     DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  7 in total

1.  Cross-cultural variation in men's preference for sexual dimorphism in women's faces.

Authors:  Urszula M Marcinkowska; Mikhail V Kozlov; Huajian Cai; Jorge Contreras-Garduño; Barnaby J Dixson; Gavita A Oana; Gwenaël Kaminski; Norman P Li; Minna T Lyons; Ike E Onyishi; Keshav Prasai; Farid Pazhoohi; Pavol Prokop; Sandra L Rosales Cardozo; Nicolle Sydney; Jose C Yong; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Caring or daring? Exploring the impact of facial masculinity/femininity and gender category information on first impressions.

Authors:  Mirella Walker; Michaela Wänke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  No evidence that partnered and unpartnered gay men differ in their preferences for male facial masculinity.

Authors:  Rachel Cassar; Victor Shiramizu; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Infants Prefer Female Body Phenotypes; Infant Girls Prefer They Have an Hourglass Shape.

Authors:  Gerianne M Alexander; Laura B Hawkins; Teresa Wilcox; Amy Hirshkowitz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-07

5.  Imprinting and flexibility in human face cognition.

Authors:  Urszula M Marcinkowska; Julien Terraube; Gwenaël Kaminski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color.

Authors:  Tomáš Kočnar; S Adil Saribay; Karel Kleisner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Role of Vision in the Emergence of Mate Preferences.

Authors:  Meike Scheller; Francine Matorres; Anthony C Little; Lucy Tompkins; Alexandra A de Sousa
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-04-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.