Literature DB >> 25039945

Analysis of patient and technical factors associated with midurethral sling mesh exposure and perforation.

David J Osborn1, Roger R Dmochowski, Catherine J Harris, Jill J Danford, Melissa R Kaufman, Stephen Mock, Laura Chang Kit, Benjamin McCormick, W Stuart Reynolds.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the technical and patient characteristics associated with the development of mesh perforation and exposure in patients after midurethral sling surgeries.
METHODS: After a retrospective review of referred patients, the risk of mesh perforation of the urinary tract over exposure in the vagina was analyzed with multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for the possible predictors of age, body mass index, smoking status at the time of mesh placement, presence of diabetes, type of sling placed, type of surgeon and trocar injury at the time of mesh placement.
RESULTS: A total of 77 women were identified, 27 with mesh perforation and 50 with mesh exposure. The patients' average body mass index was 29.2, and 13% were diabetic. Nine (33%) patients in the perforation group and two (4%) patients in the exposure group had evidence of trocar injury to the bladder or urethra at the time of mesh placement (P < 0.001). After multivariate logistic regression analysis, trocar injury (odds ratio 25.90, 95% confidence interval 2.84-236.58, P = 0.004) and diabetes (odds ratio 9.90, 95% confidence interval 1.1.25-78.64, P = 0.03) were associated with an increased risk of mesh perforation. Increased body mass index (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.99, P = 0.05) was associated with a decreased risk of mesh perforation. Finally, postoperative hematomas and blood transfusions occurred more commonly in the mesh perforation group (15% vs 0%, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Trocar injury, diabetes and bleeding complications at the time of surgery are associated with higher risk of mesh perforation in patients undergoing midurethral sling placement.
© 2014 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; erosion; extrusion; incontinence; trocar

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25039945      PMCID: PMC4755308          DOI: 10.1111/iju.12544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  21 in total

1.  One-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and trans-obturator suburethral tape from inside to outside (TVT-O) for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Marzio Angelo Zullo; Francesco Plotti; Marco Calcagno; Elettra Marullo; Innocenza Palaia; Filippo Bellati; Stefano Basile; Ludovico Muzii; Roberto Angioli; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Complication rates of tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tension-free midurethral tapes to other surgical procedures and different devices.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Antonio Galfano; Rafael Boscolo-Berto; Silvia Secco; Stefano Cavalleri; Vincenzo Ficarra; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 372. July 2007. The Role of cystourethroscopy in the generalist obstetrician-gynecologist practice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Erosions and urinary retention following polypropylene synthetic sling: Australasian survey.

Authors:  F T Hammad; A Kennedy-Smith; R G Robinson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-12-31       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Update of AUA guideline on the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Roger R Dmochowski; Jerry M Blaivas; E Ann Gormley; Saad Juma; Mickey M Karram; Deborah J Lightner; Karl M Luber; Eric S Rovner; David R Staskin; J Christian Winters; Rodney A Appell; Linda E Whetter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Randomized comparison of the suprapubic arc sling procedure vs tension-free vaginal taping for stress incontinent women.

Authors:  Ling-Hong Tseng; Alex C Wang; Yi-Haou Lin; Shwu-Jen Li; Yet-Jane Ko
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-10-27

7.  Tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape as surgery for stress urinary incontinence: results of a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Massimo Porena; Elisabetta Costantini; Bruno Frea; Antonella Giannantoni; Stefania Ranzoni; Luigi Mearini; Vittorio Bini; Ervin Kocjancic
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up.

Authors:  K L Ward; P Hilton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  The effect of concomitant prolapse repair on sling outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Mark S Litwin; Qin Wang; Chris L Pashos; Larissa V Rodríguez
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  RETIRED: Midurethral minimally invasive sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jane A Schulz; Michelle C Chan; Scott A Farrell
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2008-08
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Mesh Perforation into a Viscus in the Setting of Pelvic Floor Surgery-Presentation and Management.

Authors:  Seth A Cohen; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Mesh Excision: Is Total Mesh Excision Necessary?

Authors:  Gillian F Wolff; J Christian Winters; Ryan M Krlin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Transvaginal sling excision: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Marisa M Clifton; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Functional outcomes of vaginal surgery for urethral extrusion of mid-urethral tape in women.

Authors:  Bogdan Toia; Stephen Unterberg; Neha Sihra; Mahreen Pakzad; Rizwan Hamid; Jeremy L Ockrim; Tamsin J Greenwell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 1.932

6.  Characterization of vaginal immune response to a polypropylene mesh: Diabetic vs. normoglycemic conditions.

Authors:  Rui Liang; Abigail Fisk; Gabrielle King; Leslie Meyn; Xiangwei Xiao; Pamela Moalli
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 10.633

Review 7.  Update on complications of synthetic suburethral slings.

Authors:  Cristiano Mendes Gomes; Fabrício Leite Carvalho; Carlos Henrique Suzuki Bellucci; Thiago Souto Hemerly; Fábio Baracat; Jose de Bessa; Miguel Srougi; Homero Bruschini
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Labial Cellulitis and Suprapubic Urine Leakage after Midurethral Sling: A Rare Presentation of Unrecognized Bladder Neck Perforation.

Authors:  Narjes Saberi; Mahtab Zargham; Aygineh Hayrabedian
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2021-10-14

9.  Twenty-Five Years of the Midurethral Sling: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Jinna Yao; Vincent Tse
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.038

10.  Road to recovery after transvaginal surgery for urethral mesh perforation: evaluation of outcomes and subsequent procedures.

Authors:  Casey G Kowalik; Joshua A Cohn; Andrea Kakos; Patrick Lang; W Stuart Reynolds; Melissa R Kaufman; Mickey M Karram; Roger R Dmochowski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.894

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.