| Literature DB >> 25039868 |
Jason R Westin1, Peter McLaughlin, Jorge Romaguera, Fredrick B Hagemeister, Barbara Pro, Nam H Dang, Felipe Samaniego, Maria A Rodriguez, Luis Fayad, Yasuhiro Oki, Michelle Fanale, Nathan Fowler, Loretta Nastoupil, Lei Feng, Evelyn Loyer, Anas Younes.
Abstract
Relapsed aggressive lymphomas are often treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) followed by an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Response rates to PBC in patients with relapsed aggressive lymphomas are c. 60%, and non-responders have a dismal prognosis. Novel therapies for aggressive lymphomas, including those failing PBC, are needed. We performed a phase II study of paclitaxel, topotecan and rituximab (TTR) in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell, follicular grade IIIB, or transformed lymphomas, including those who previously failed PBC. The median age of the 72 patients enrolled was 54 years. Responding patients were offered ASCT after two courses. The overall response rate was 69% for all patients (n = 49/71) and 45% for those who previously failed PBC (n = 9/20). With a median follow up of 125 months for the censored observations, the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival at 5 years was 39% and 27%, respectively. Responding patients who received ASCT had an OS of 63% at 5 years. Our results demonstrate that TTR is an effective salvage regimen for patients with relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphomas, including those who previously failed PBC. Given the declining therapeutic outcomes of salvage PBC in the rituximab era, further evaluation of TTR is warranted.Entities:
Keywords: chemotherapy; clinical trial; non-Hodgkin lymphoma; paclitaxel; topotecan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25039868 PMCID: PMC5279071 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998