Literature DB >> 25039732

Medical education research: a vibrant community of research and education practice.

Cees P M van der Vleuten1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Medical education research is thriving. In recent decades, numbers of journals and publications have increased enormously, as have the number and size of medical education meetings around the world. The aim of this paper is to shed some light on the origins of this success. My central argument is that dialogue between education practice (and its teachers) and education research (and its researchers) is indispensable. REFLECTIONS: To illustrate how I have come to this perspective, I discuss two crucial developments of personal import to myself. The first is the development of assessment theory informed by both research findings and insights emerging from implementations conducted in collaboration with teachers and learners. The second is the establishment of a department of education that includes many members from the medical domain.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical education is thriving because it is shaped and nourished within a community of practice of collaborating teachers, practitioners and researchers. This obviates the threat of a fissure between education research and education practice. The values of this community of practice - inclusiveness, openness, supportiveness, nurture and mentorship - are key elements for its sustainability. In pacing the development of our research in a manner that maintains this synergy, we should be mindful of the zone of proximal development of our community of practice.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25039732     DOI: 10.1111/medu.12508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  6 in total

1.  A meaningful MESS (Medical Education Scholarship Support).

Authors:  Shari A Whicker; Deborah L Engle; Saumil Chudgar; Stephen DeMeo; Sarah M Bean; Aditee P Narayan; Colleen O'Connor Grochowski; Alisa Nagler
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-07-29

2.  "Turning Point": Evaluating the Impact of a Three-Month UK-Based Clinical Education Training Programme for Physicians from a Chinese Medical School.

Authors:  Mohammed A Rashid; John-George Nicholson; Faruq Fazal; Samantha Gallivan; Daphne Thomas; Leiting Xu; Deborah Gill
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2020-08-28

3.  "My right-hand man" versus "We barely make use of them": change leaders talking about educational scientists in curriculum change processes-a Membership Categorization Analysis.

Authors:  Floor Velthuis; Esther Helmich; Hanke Dekker; Tom Koole; A Debbie C Jaarsma
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.853

4.  Research utilization process model: A cyclical, spiral, and developmental process to provide conclusive research knowledge in health professions education.

Authors:  Tahereh Changiz; Alireza Yousefy; Mohammad Fakhari
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2020-07-14

5.  Assessing changes in the quality of quantitative health educations research: a perspective from communities of practice.

Authors:  Katherine M Wright; Larry D Gruppen; Kevin W Kuo; Andrew Muzyk; Jeffry Nahmias; Darcy A Reed; Gurjit Sandhu; Anita V Shelgikar; Jennifer N Stojan; Toshiko L Uchida; Rebecca Wallihan; Larry Hurtubise
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  The sensemaking narratives of scientists working in health professions education scholarship units: The Canadian experience.

Authors:  Brittany Etmanski; Stanley J Hamstra; Lara Varpio
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2020-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.