Literature DB >> 25039627

Nasogastric tube depth: the 'NEX' guideline is incorrect.

Stephen J Taylor1, Kaylee Allan, Helen McWilliam, Deirdre Toher.   

Abstract

Misplacing 17-23% of nasogastric (NG) tubes above the stomach ( Rollins et al, 2012 ; Rayner, 2013 ) represents a serious risk in terms of aspiration, further invasive (tube) procedures, irradiation from failed X-ray confirmation, delay to feed and medication. One causal factor is that in the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) guidance to place a tube, length is measured from nose to ear to xiphisternum (NEX) ( NSPA, 2011 ); NEX is incorrect because it only approximates the nose to gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) distance and is therefore too short. To overcome this and because the xiphisternum is more difficult to locate, local policy is to measure in the opposite direction; xiphisternum to ear to nose (XEN), then add 10 cm. The authors determined whether external body measurements can be used to estimate the NG tube length to safely reach the gastric body. This involved testing the statistical association of body length, age, sex and XEN in consecutive critically ill patients against internal anatomical landmarks determined from an electromagnetic (EM) trace of the tube path. XEN averaged 50 cm in 71 critically ill patients aged 53±20 years. Tube marking and the EM trace were used to determine mean insertion distances at pre-gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) (48 cm), where the tube first turns left towards the stomach and becomes shallow on the trace; gastric body (62 cm), where the tube reaches the left-most part of the stomach; and gastric antrum (73 cm) at the midline on the EM trace. Using body length, age, sex and XEN in a linear regression model, only 25% of variability was predicted, showing that external measurements cannot reliably predict the length of tube required to reach the stomach. A tube length of XEN (or NEX) is too short to guarantee gastric placement and is unsafe. XEN+10 cm or more complex measurements will reach the gastric body (mid-stomach) in most patients, but because of wide variation, external measurements often fail to predict a safe distance. Only the EM trace or possibly direct vision can show in real time whether the tip has safely reached the gastric body.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortrak; Misplacement; Nasogastric tube; Nose-ear-xiphisternum (NEX)

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25039627     DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.12.641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nurs        ISSN: 0966-0461


  4 in total

1.  To characterize the incidence of airway misplacement of nasogastric tubes in anesthetized intubated patients by using a manometer technique.

Authors:  Shao-Wei Hsieh; Hung-Shu Chen; Yi-Ting Chen; Kuo-Chuan Hung
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Anterior Superior Iliac Spine to the Tibial Tuberosity Length: An Easier, Accurate, and Faster Method for Predicting Orogastric Tube Length in Neonates-An Observational Study.

Authors:  Samarendra Mahapatro; Satish Mohanty; Sandeep Kumar Panigrahi; Rajib Kumar Ray; Shruti Saraswat
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2017-03-30

3.  Clinical nurses' nasogastric feeding practices in adults: a multicenter cross-sectional survey in China.

Authors:  Li-Chun Xu; Xiao-Jin Huang; Bi-Xia Lin; Jun-Yi Zheng; Hai-Hua Zhu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  A Low-Cost, Point-of-Care Test for Confirmation of Nasogastric Tube Placement via Magnetic Field Tracking.

Authors:  Muneaki Miyasaka; Hao Li; Kon Voi Tay; Soo Jay Phee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.