Literature DB >> 25039448

Higher insulin detemir doses are required for the similar glycemic control: comparison of insulin detemir and glargine in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Saygın Abalı1, Serap Turan1, Zeynep Atay1, Tülay Güran1, Belma Haliloğlu1, Abdullah Bereket1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), total and basal insulin doses, basal insulin injection frequencies, and body mass index (BMI) in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) who are receiving detemir and glargine as basal insulin in a basal-bolus therapy.
METHOD: This retrospective study included 117 (53 females) children and adolescents with T1DM older than 4 yr of age, minimum diabetes duration of 2 yr, and receiving basal-bolus insulin regimen (at least 4 injections/d, insulin aspart or lispro as bolus insulin). Comparisons were made for those receiving insulin detemir (n = 32) or glargine (n = 85) as the basal insulin.
RESULTS: Age, pubertal status, BMI standard deviation scores, and diabetes duration were similar in detemir and glargine groups. Glycemic control was similar in both groups (HbA1c levels 8.9 ± 2.1% vs. 8.5 ± 1.7% for detemir and glargine, respectively; p = 0.497). Both mean basal insulin (0.52 vs. 0.41 U/kg/d, p < 0.001) and mean total daily insulin (1.11 vs. 0.93 U/kg/d, p < 0.001) doses were higher in the detemir group. Furthermore, higher ratio of twice-daily basal insulin injection was detected in the detemir group (62.5 vs. 32.9% p = 0.004). Subgroup analysis according to pubertal status, or the number of daily basal injections showed similar results.
CONCLUSION: Insulin detemir provides similar glycemic control with glargine, but, approximately 27% higher mean basal and 19% higher mean total insulin doses with two-fold more twice-daily basal insulin injection requirement.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HbA1c; T1D; children; detemir; glargine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25039448     DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes        ISSN: 1399-543X            Impact factor:   4.866


  6 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL versus 100 U/mL in Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hernando Vargas-Uricoechea
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.011

2.  Therapeutically interchangeable? A study of real-world outcomes associated with switching basal insulin analogues among US patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using electronic medical records data.

Authors:  P Levin; W Wei; R Miao; F Ye; L Xie; O Baser; J Gill
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 3.  rDNA insulin glargine U300 - a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Stefanie Zassman; Philip A Goldberg
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.168

4.  Differences of FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System and Finger Pricks on Clinical Characteristics and Glucose Monitoring Satisfactions in Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Pump.

Authors:  Ayman A Al Hayek; Asirvatham A Robert; Mohamed A Al Dawish
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2019-07-01

5.  Effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine versus detemir analysis in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thales B C Silva; Paulo H R F Almeida; Vania E Araújo; Francisco de Assis Acurcio; Augusto A Guerra Júnior; Brian Godman; Juliana Alvares
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 6.  Concentrated insulins: the new basal insulins.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Lamos; Lisa M Younk; Stephen N Davis
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.423

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.