S Brown1,2, D Gartland1, S Perlen1, E McDonald1, C MacArthur3. 1. Healthy Mothers Healthy Families Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic., Australia. 2. General Practice and Primary Health Care Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia. 3. Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health and Population Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the extent to which primary-care practitioners routinely inquire about postpartum urinary and faecal incontinence, and assess the proportion of women who disclose symptoms. DESIGN: Prospective pregnancy cohort study of nulliparous women. SETTING: Melbourne, Australia. SAMPLE: A total of 1507 nulliparous women recruited in early pregnancy. METHOD: Women were recruited from six public maternity hospitals, with follow up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postpartum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardised measures of urinary and bowel symptoms, and measures of health service use. RESULTS: In the first 12 months postpartum, the period prevalence of urinary incontinence was 47%, and of faecal incontinence was 17%. In all, 86% of women visited a primary health-care practitioner at least once to discuss their own health in the first year after childbirth. However, only around a quarter were asked about urinary incontinence, and fewer than one in five women were asked about faecal incontinence. Discussion of symptoms with health professionals was most likely to occur in the first 3 months postpartum, and happened only rarely during the remainder of the first postnatal year. Over 70% of women reporting severe urinary incontinence and/or faecal incontinence had not discussed symptoms with a health professional. CONCLUSION: The findings provide robust evidence that many women experiencing postpartum urinary and faecal incontinence—including women with moderate and severe symptoms—do not receive adequate primary-care follow up in the first 12 months postpartum. Systems of maternal health surveillance need to include routine inquiry about urinary and faecal incontinence to overcome women's reluctance to seek help.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the extent to which primary-care practitioners routinely inquire about postpartum urinary and faecal incontinence, and assess the proportion of women who disclose symptoms. DESIGN: Prospective pregnancy cohort study of nulliparous women. SETTING: Melbourne, Australia. SAMPLE: A total of 1507 nulliparous women recruited in early pregnancy. METHOD:Women were recruited from six public maternity hospitals, with follow up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postpartum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardised measures of urinary and bowel symptoms, and measures of health service use. RESULTS: In the first 12 months postpartum, the period prevalence of urinary incontinence was 47%, and of faecal incontinence was 17%. In all, 86% of women visited a primary health-care practitioner at least once to discuss their own health in the first year after childbirth. However, only around a quarter were asked about urinary incontinence, and fewer than one in five women were asked about faecal incontinence. Discussion of symptoms with health professionals was most likely to occur in the first 3 months postpartum, and happened only rarely during the remainder of the first postnatal year. Over 70% of women reporting severe urinary incontinence and/or faecal incontinence had not discussed symptoms with a health professional. CONCLUSION: The findings provide robust evidence that many women experiencing postpartum urinary and faecal incontinence—including women with moderate and severe symptoms—do not receive adequate primary-care follow up in the first 12 months postpartum. Systems of maternal health surveillance need to include routine inquiry about urinary and faecal incontinence to overcome women's reluctance to seek help.
Authors: Cristine Homsi Jorge Ferreira; Peter L Dwyer; Melissa Davidson; Alison De Souza; Julio Alvarez Ugarte; Helena C Frawley Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2015-06-14 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Heidi F A Moossdorff-Steinhauser; Bary C M Berghmans; Marc E A Spaanderman; Esther M J Bols Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Victoria E Salmon; E Jean C Hay-Smith; Rachel Jarvie; Sarah Dean; Eivor Oborn; Susan E Bayliss; Debra Bick; Clare Davenport; Khaled M Ismail; Christine MacArthur; Mark Pearson Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2017-01-25
Authors: Heidi F A Moossdorff-Steinhauser; Bary C M Berghmans; Marc E A Spaanderman; Esther M J Bols Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: M R B Keighley; Yvette Perston; Elissa Bradshaw; Joanne Hayes; D Margaret Keighley; Sara Webb Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Ingrid E Nygaard; Ali Wolpern; Tyler Bardsley; Marlene J Egger; Janet M Shaw Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 8.661