PURPOSE: To determine diagnostic performance of simple measurements on diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) for assessment of complete tumour response (CR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) by signal intensity (SI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with LARC who underwent neoadjuvant CRT and subsequent surgery were included. Patients underwent pre-CRT and post-CRT 3.0 T MRI. Regions of interest of the highest brightness SI were included in the tumour volume on post-CRT DWI to calculate the SIlesion, rSI, ADClesion and rADC; diagnostic performance was compared by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In order to validate the accuracy and reproducibility of the current strategy, the same procedure was reproduced in 80 patients with LARC at 1.5 T MRI. RESULTS: Areas under the ROC curve for identification of a CR, based on SIlesion, rSI, ADClesion, and rADC, respectively, were 0.86, 0.94, 0.66, and 0.71 at 3.0 T MRI, and 0.92, 0.91, 0.64, and 0.61 at 1.5 T MRI. CONCLUSION: Post-CRT DWI SIlesion and rSI provided high diagnostic performance in assessing CR and were significantly more accurate than ADClesion, and rADC at 3.0 T MRI and 1.5 T MRI. KEY POINTS: • Signal intensity (SI lesion ) and rSI are accurate for assessment of complete response. • rSI seems to be superior to SI lesion at 3.0 T MRI. • ADC or rADC measurements are not accurate for assessment of complete response.
PURPOSE: To determine diagnostic performance of simple measurements on diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) for assessment of complete tumour response (CR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) by signal intensity (SI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with LARC who underwent neoadjuvant CRT and subsequent surgery were included. Patients underwent pre-CRT and post-CRT 3.0 T MRI. Regions of interest of the highest brightness SI were included in the tumour volume on post-CRT DWI to calculate the SIlesion, rSI, ADClesion and rADC; diagnostic performance was compared by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In order to validate the accuracy and reproducibility of the current strategy, the same procedure was reproduced in 80 patients with LARC at 1.5 T MRI. RESULTS: Areas under the ROC curve for identification of a CR, based on SIlesion, rSI, ADClesion, and rADC, respectively, were 0.86, 0.94, 0.66, and 0.71 at 3.0 T MRI, and 0.92, 0.91, 0.64, and 0.61 at 1.5 T MRI. CONCLUSION: Post-CRT DWI SIlesion and rSI provided high diagnostic performance in assessing CR and were significantly more accurate than ADClesion, and rADC at 3.0 T MRI and 1.5 T MRI. KEY POINTS: • Signal intensity (SI lesion ) and rSI are accurate for assessment of complete response. • rSI seems to be superior to SI lesion at 3.0 T MRI. • ADC or rADC measurements are not accurate for assessment of complete response.
Authors: Vincent Vandecaveye; Frederik De Keyzer; Sandra Nuyts; Karen Deraedt; Piet Dirix; Pascal Hamaekers; Vincent Vander Poorten; Pierre Delaere; Robert Hermans Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-12-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Luís Curvo-Semedo; Doenja M J Lambregts; Monique Maas; Thomas Thywissen; Rana T Mehsen; Guido Lammering; Geerard L Beets; Filipe Caseiro-Alves; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jose G Guillem; David B Chessin; Alfred M Cohen; Jinru Shia; Madhu Mazumdar; Warren Enker; Philip B Paty; Martin R Weiser; David Klimstra; Leonard Saltz; Bruce D Minsky; W Douglas Wong Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Luiz Felipe de Campos-Lobato; Daniel P Geisler; Andre da Luz Moreira; Luca Stocchi; David Dietz; Matthew F Kalady Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Thomas Borschitz; Daniel Wachtlin; Markus Möhler; Heinz Schmidberger; Theodor Junginger Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-12-28 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: David D B Bates; Jennifer S Golia Pernicka; James L Fuqua; Viktoriya Paroder; Iva Petkovska; Junting Zheng; Marinela Capanu; Juliana Schilsky; Marc J Gollub Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2020-02
Authors: Andreas M Hötker; Lisa Tarlinton; Yousef Mazaheri; Kaitlin M Woo; Mithat Gönen; Leonard B Saltz; Karyn A Goodman; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Marc J Gollub Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-03-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Doenja M J Lambregts; Max J Lahaye; Luc A Heijnen; Milou H Martens; Monique Maas; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 5.315