Literature DB >> 25038463

Identification of candidate odorant degrading gene/enzyme systems in the antennal transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Faisal Younus1, Thomas Chertemps2, Stephen L Pearce1, Gunjan Pandey3, Françoise Bozzolan2, Christopher W Coppin3, Robyn J Russell3, Martine Maïbèche-Coisne2, John G Oakeshott4.   

Abstract

The metabolism of volatile signal molecules by odorant degrading enzymes (ODEs) is crucial to the ongoing sensitivity and specificity of chemoreception in various insects, and a few specific esterases, cytochrome P450s, glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) and UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGTs) have previously been implicated in this process. Significant progress has been made in characterizing ODEs in Lepidoptera but very little is known about them in Diptera, including in Drosophila melanogaster, a major insect model. We have therefore carried out a transcriptomic analysis of the antennae of D. melanogaster in order to identify candidate ODEs. Virgin male and female and mated female antennal transcriptomes were determined by RNAseq. As with the Lepidoptera, we found that many esterases, cytochrome P450 enzymes, GSTs and UGTs are expressed in D. melanogaster antennae. As olfactory genes generally show selective expression in the antennae, a comparison to previously published transcriptomes for other tissues has been performed, showing preferential expression in the antennae for one esterase, JHEdup, one cytochrome P450, CYP308a1, and one GST, GSTE4. These largely uncharacterized enzymes are now prime candidates for ODE functions. JHEdup was expressed heterologously and found to have high catalytic activity against a chemically diverse group of known ester odorants for this species. This is a finding consistent with an ODE although it might suggest a general role in clearing several odorants rather than a specific role in clearing a particular odorant. Our findings do not preclude the possibility of odorant degrading functions for other antennally expressed esterases, P450s, GSTs and UGTs but, if so, they suggest that these enzymes also have additional functions in other tissues.
Copyright © 2014 CSIRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antenna; Cytochrome P450; Esterase; Odorant degradation; Transcriptome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25038463     DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2014.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 0965-1748            Impact factor:   4.714


  44 in total

1.  Proteomic Analysis of Silkworm Antennae.

Authors:  Yunpo Zhao; Haichao Li; Xuexia Miao
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Profiles of soluble proteins in chemosensory organs of three members of the afro-tropical Anopheles gambiae complex.

Authors:  Immacolata Iovinella; Beniamino Caputo; Maria Calzetta; Laurence J Zwiebel; Francesca Romana Dani; Alessandra Della Torre
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Alternative transcript splicing regulates UDP-glucosyltransferase-catalyzed detoxification of DIMBOA in the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda).

Authors:  Bhawana Israni; Katrin Luck; Samantha C W Römhild; Bettina Raguschke; Natalie Wielsch; Yvonne Hupfer; Michael Reichelt; Aleš Svatoš; Jonathan Gershenzon; Daniel Giddings Vassão
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Comparative analysis of mite genomes reveals positive selection for diet adaptation.

Authors:  Qiong Liu; Yuhua Deng; An Song; Yifan Xiang; Lai Wei
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-03

5.  Antennal Transcriptome Analysis of Odorant Reception Genes in the Red Turpentine Beetle (RTB), Dendroctonus valens.

Authors:  Xiao-Cui Gu; Ya-Nan Zhang; Ke Kang; Shuang-Lin Dong; Long-Wa Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Expression Divergence of Chemosensory Genes between Drosophila sechellia and Its Sibling Species and Its Implications for Host Shift.

Authors:  Meng-Shin Shiao; Jia-Ming Chang; Wen-Lang Fan; Mei-Yeh Jade Lu; Cedric Notredame; Shu Fang; Rumi Kondo; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Differential Odour Coding of Isotopomers in the Honeybee Brain.

Authors:  Marco Paoli; Andrea Anesi; Renzo Antolini; Graziano Guella; Giorgio Vallortigara; Albrecht Haase
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Mating increases Drosophila melanogaster females' choosiness by reducing olfactory sensitivity to a male pheromone.

Authors:  Philip Kohlmeier; Ye Zhang; Jenke A Gorter; Chih-Ying Su; Jean-Christophe Billeter
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 19.100

9.  The peripheral olfactory code in Drosophila larvae contains temporal information and is robust over multiple timescales.

Authors:  Micheline Grillet; Dario Campagner; Rasmus Petersen; Catherine McCrohan; Matthew Cobb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Differential Expression Analysis of Chemoreception Genes in the Striped Flea Beetle Phyllotreta striolata Using a Transcriptomic Approach.

Authors:  Zhongzhen Wu; Shuying Bin; Hualiang He; Zhengbing Wang; Mei Li; Jintian Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.