Literature DB >> 25038399

The robustness and innovability of protein folds.

Agnes Tóth-Petróczy1, Dan S Tawfik2.   

Abstract

Assignment of protein folds to functions indicates that >60% of folds carry out one or two enzymatic functions, while few folds, for example, the TIM-barrel and Rossmann folds, exhibit hundreds. Are there structural features that make a fold amenable to functional innovation (innovability)? Do these features relate to robustness--the ability to readily accumulate sequence changes? We discuss several hypotheses regarding the relationship between the architecture of a protein and its evolutionary potential. We describe how, in a seemingly paradoxical manner, opposite properties, such as high stability and rigidity versus conformational plasticity and structural order versus disorder, promote robustness and/or innovability. We hypothesize that polarity--differentiation and low connectivity between a protein's scaffold and its active-site--is a key prerequisite for innovability.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25038399     DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol        ISSN: 0959-440X            Impact factor:   6.809


  46 in total

1.  SHV-129: A Gateway to Global Suppressors in the SHV β-Lactamase Family?

Authors:  Marisa L Winkler; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  The enzymatic nature of an anonymous protein sequence cannot reliably be inferred from superfamily level structural information alone.

Authors:  Daniel Barry Roche; Thomas Brüls
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  A bioarchitectonic approach to the modular engineering of metabolism.

Authors:  Cheryl A Kerfeld
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Structural and functional innovations in the real-time evolution of new (βα)8 barrel enzymes.

Authors:  Matilda S Newton; Xiaohu Guo; Annika Söderholm; Joakim Näsvall; Patrik Lundström; Dan I Andersson; Maria Selmer; Wayne M Patrick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Using Evolution to Guide Protein Engineering: The Devil IS in the Details.

Authors:  Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  A mechanistic view of enzyme evolution.

Authors:  Gloria Yang; Charlotte M Miton; Nobuhiko Tokuriki
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Probing pathways of adaptation with continuous evolution.

Authors:  Ziwei Zhong; Chang C Liu
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2019-02-13

Review 8.  Bacterial microcompartments.

Authors:  Cheryl A Kerfeld; Clement Aussignargues; Jan Zarzycki; Fei Cai; Markus Sutter
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 60.633

9.  QM/MM free energy simulations: recent progress and challenges.

Authors:  Xiya Lu; Dong Fang; Shingo Ito; Yuko Okamoto; Victor Ovchinnikov; Qiang Cui
Journal:  Mol Simul       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.178

Review 10.  Adaptability of protein structures to enable functional interactions and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Turkan Haliloglu; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.