OBJECTIVE: Emotion regulation dysfunctions marked by negative affectivity are a core feature of borderline personality disorder (BPD). In addition, patients with BPD show disturbed attentional processes which become particularly apparent in the domain of selective attention when emotional stimuli are presented (negative attentional bias). Assuming that emotion regulation is linked to attentional deployment processes, this study aimed (1) to determine whether a negative attentional bias is established by using film clips of fearful faces and (2) to investigate the association between dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies (emotional suppression) and negative attention bias in BPD. METHODS: We investigated 18 inpatients with BPD and 18 healthy control participants using the modified version of the fearful face-paradigm to assess the inhibition of emotional stimuli. We also administered self-report emotion regulation questionnaires. RESULTS: Compared to the healthy controls, patients with BPD showed significant longer reaction times during the emotional versus the neutral film stimuli in the modified fearful face-paradigm. With regard to the second hypothesis, we failed to find an association between the negative attentional bias and the habitual use of emotional suppression in BPD. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we could confirm an attentional bias for negative stimuli, using complex, dynamic material. Future studies need to address the impact of confounding variables (e. g. comorbid disorders) on the relationship between maladaptive emotion regulation and selective attentional bias.
OBJECTIVE: Emotion regulation dysfunctions marked by negative affectivity are a core feature of borderline personality disorder (BPD). In addition, patients with BPD show disturbed attentional processes which become particularly apparent in the domain of selective attention when emotional stimuli are presented (negative attentional bias). Assuming that emotion regulation is linked to attentional deployment processes, this study aimed (1) to determine whether a negative attentional bias is established by using film clips of fearful faces and (2) to investigate the association between dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies (emotional suppression) and negative attention bias in BPD. METHODS: We investigated 18 inpatients with BPD and 18 healthy control participants using the modified version of the fearful face-paradigm to assess the inhibition of emotional stimuli. We also administered self-report emotion regulation questionnaires. RESULTS: Compared to the healthy controls, patients with BPD showed significant longer reaction times during the emotional versus the neutral film stimuli in the modified fearful face-paradigm. With regard to the second hypothesis, we failed to find an association between the negative attentional bias and the habitual use of emotional suppression in BPD. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we could confirm an attentional bias for negative stimuli, using complex, dynamic material. Future studies need to address the impact of confounding variables (e. g. comorbid disorders) on the relationship between maladaptive emotion regulation and selective attentional bias.
Authors: M Schacher; B Haemmerle; F G Woermann; M Okujava; D Huber; T Grunwald; G Krämer; H Jokeit Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-01-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ina-Alexandra von Ceumern-Lindenstjerna; Romuald Brunner; Peter Parzer; Christoph Mundt; Peter Fiedler; Franz Resch Journal: Psychopathology Date: 2010-01-09 Impact factor: 1.944
Authors: Gitta A Jacob; Kerstin Zvonik; Susanne Kamphausen; Alexandra Sebastian; Simon Maier; Alexandra Philipsen; Ludger Tebartz van Elst; Klaus Lieb; Oliver Tüscher Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Annegret Krause-Utz; Esther Sobanski; Barbara Alm; Gabriele Valerius; Nikolaus Kleindienst; Martin Bohus; Christian Schmahl Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Nelson H Donegan; Charles A Sanislow; Hilary P Blumberg; Robert K Fulbright; Cheryl Lacadie; Pawel Skudlarski; John C Gore; Ingrid R Olson; Thomas H McGlashan; Bruce E Wexler Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 13.382