Literature DB >> 25037956

Missed peritalar injuries: an analysis of factors in cases of known delayed diagnosis and methods for improving identification.

Sean A Matuszak1, Erin A Baker1, Cory M Stewart1, Paul T Fortin2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Because of the complex anatomy of the foot, rarity of fractures of the foot, and subtle radiographic cues, foot injuries are commonly overlooked and mis/undiagnosed. This study seeks to investigate a patient population whose peritalar injuries, including fractures and dislocations, were missed on initial examination, in order to analyze factors of known, missed injuries and provide insight into methods for reducing the incidence of missed diagnoses. Surgical cases between January 1999 and May 2011 were queried and retrospectively reviewed to identify missed peritalar injuries. Of 1682 surgical cases reviewed, 27 patients with missed peritalar injury(ies), which were subsequently confirmed by imaging studies, were identified. Using the Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, fracture and dislocation subtypes were classified. A medical record review was performed to assess demographic and surgical data elements. In this study population, 7 types of peritalar injuries (talus, calcaneal, navicular, and cuboid fractures as well as subtalar, calcaneocuboid, and talonavicular joint dislocations) were diagnosed in 27 patients. All patients required surgical intervention. Talus fractures were the most commonly missed injury. In patients with multiple peritalar injuries, there was a strong correlation between talus and navicular fractures (r = -0.60; P < .01) as well as a moderate correlation between talus fractures and calcaneocuboid dislocations (r = -0.46; P = .02). The presence of a calcaneal fracture significantly decreased the time to definitive diagnosis (P = .01). Male patients' diagnoses were delayed an average of 324 days and females 105 days (P = .04). A moderate correlation was found between patient age at injury and time to diagnosis (r = -0.47; P = .04), with a decreased time to diagnosis as patient age increased. Significant factors were identified in this patient population, including patient sex and age, which may contribute to missed or delayed diagnosis in the clinical setting. Prompt and accurate diagnosis of peritalar injuries may improve long-term outcomes. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Care Management, Level V.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  delayed diagnosis; foot fracture; missed diagnosis; peritalar injury

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25037956     DOI: 10.1177/1938640014537302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Spec        ISSN: 1938-6400


  4 in total

1.  The added value of cross-sectional imaging in the detection of additional radiographically occult fractures in the setting of a Chopart fracture.

Authors:  Renata R Almeida; Mohammad Mansouri; David K Tso; Anne H Johnson; Michael H Lev; Ajay K Singh; Efren J Flores
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06

2.  Plate Fixation of Talus Fractures: Where, When, and How?

Authors:  Michael Swords; Harrison Lakehomer; Michael McDonald; Jay Patel
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  Subtalar Dislocations.

Authors:  Siddhartha Sharma; Sandeep Patel; Mandeep S Dhillon
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-12-22

4.  Talar Middle Facet Fracture: A Report of 2 Cases.

Authors:  Marcos Hideyo Sakaki; Kenji Maeda Missima; Nacime Salomão Barbachan Mansur; Cesar de Cesar Netto
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-08-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.