Bi O Jeong1, Myung Seo Kim2, Wook Jae Song2, Nelson F SooHoo3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea biojeong@khmc.or.kr. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) reinforcement and analyze differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes based on whether or not IER reinforcement was performed in modified Broström procedures. METHODS: Forty-one patients (41 ankles) who underwent ankle reconstruction with either a Broström procedure or modified Broström with IER reinforcement were included in this prospective study. During Broström procedures, feasibility of IER reinforcement was recorded. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed between modified Broström procedures (MBP group) in which IER reinforcement was feasible and Broström procedures (BP group) in which IER reinforcement was not feasible. RESULTS: IER reinforcement was feasible in 31 cases (75.6%) and not feasible in 10 cases (24.4%) due to anatomic variations. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score improved in the MBP group from a preoperative mean of 66.3 to a postoperative mean of 89.4. In the BP group, the score increased from 71.3 to 89.8. The radiographic outcomes assessed by stress radiographs demonstrated that talar anterior translation and talar tilt improved from 6.3 mm to 4.6 mm and from 9.0 degrees to 5.0 degrees, respectively, in the MBP group. In the BP group, talar anterior translation improved from 6.9 mm to 4.9 mm and talar tilt, from 9.5 degrees to 4.9 degrees. No statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: IER reinforcement was feasible in 75.6% of patients in whom modified Broström procedures had been planned. Postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes were not significantly different based on whether or not IER reinforcement was performed. These findings suggest that isolated ligament reconstruction without IER may be sufficient to restore ankle stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, cohort study.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) reinforcement and analyze differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes based on whether or not IER reinforcement was performed in modified Broström procedures. METHODS: Forty-one patients (41 ankles) who underwent ankle reconstruction with either a Broström procedure or modified Broström with IER reinforcement were included in this prospective study. During Broström procedures, feasibility of IER reinforcement was recorded. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed between modified Broström procedures (MBP group) in which IER reinforcement was feasible and Broström procedures (BP group) in which IER reinforcement was not feasible. RESULTS: IER reinforcement was feasible in 31 cases (75.6%) and not feasible in 10 cases (24.4%) due to anatomic variations. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score improved in the MBP group from a preoperative mean of 66.3 to a postoperative mean of 89.4. In the BP group, the score increased from 71.3 to 89.8. The radiographic outcomes assessed by stress radiographs demonstrated that talar anterior translation and talar tilt improved from 6.3 mm to 4.6 mm and from 9.0 degrees to 5.0 degrees, respectively, in the MBP group. In the BP group, talar anterior translation improved from 6.9 mm to 4.9 mm and talar tilt, from 9.5 degrees to 4.9 degrees. No statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: IER reinforcement was feasible in 75.6% of patients in whom modified Broström procedures had been planned. Postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes were not significantly different based on whether or not IER reinforcement was performed. These findings suggest that isolated ligament reconstruction without IER may be sufficient to restore ankle stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, cohort study.
Authors: M Dalmau-Pastor; F Malagelada; G M M J Kerkhoffs; M C Manzanares; J Vega Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: M Dalmau-Pastor; Y Yasui; J D Calder; J Karlsson; G M M J Kerkhoffs; J G Kennedy Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.342