Franziska Krumbiegel1, Martin Hastedt, Michael Tsokos. 1. Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Turmstrasse 21, Haus N, 10559, Berlin, Germany, franziska.krumbiegel@charite.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In this study, the usefulness of nail samples instead of hair for a general unknown screening (GUS) for drugs was tested. An alternative matrix for long term detection is still needed in cases where no hair is available for analysis. METHODS: Hair and nail samples from 70 postmortem cases were analyzed by liquid-chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Hair and nail samples were ground by a ball mill and extracted twice for 18 h. Extracts were measured in Auto MS/MS mode (data dependent mode acquisition). RESULTS: Only 10% of the cases showed a disagreement of results in hair and nail analysis where hair samples were tested positive and corresponding nail samples were tested negative in a general unknown screening for drugs. In most of the cases investigated the analysis of the nail clippings and whole nail samples led to results comparable to those obtained from hair analysis. The incorporation of a large number of substances into the nail matrix was proven by the detection of 89 different analytes (e.g. antidepressants, drugs of abuse or antihypertonics) in our tests. CONCLUSION: In cases where the amount of hair available is not sufficient for a general unknown screening for drugs, nails appear to be a useful comparable matrix for the detection of long-term drug consumption due to the comparison of the qualitative GUS results from the hair and nail samples in this study.
PURPOSE: In this study, the usefulness of nail samples instead of hair for a general unknown screening (GUS) for drugs was tested. An alternative matrix for long term detection is still needed in cases where no hair is available for analysis. METHODS: Hair and nail samples from 70 postmortem cases were analyzed by liquid-chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Hair and nail samples were ground by a ball mill and extracted twice for 18 h. Extracts were measured in Auto MS/MS mode (data dependent mode acquisition). RESULTS: Only 10% of the cases showed a disagreement of results in hair and nail analysis where hair samples were tested positive and corresponding nail samples were tested negative in a general unknown screening for drugs. In most of the cases investigated the analysis of the nail clippings and whole nail samples led to results comparable to those obtained from hair analysis. The incorporation of a large number of substances into the nail matrix was proven by the detection of 89 different analytes (e.g. antidepressants, drugs of abuse or antihypertonics) in our tests. CONCLUSION: In cases where the amount of hair available is not sufficient for a general unknown screening for drugs, nails appear to be a useful comparable matrix for the detection of long-term drug consumption due to the comparison of the qualitative GUS results from the hair and nail samples in this study.
Authors: Sebastian Broecker; Sieglinde Herre; Bernhard Wüst; Jerry Zweigenbaum; Fritz Pragst Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 4.142
Authors: Franziska Krumbiegel; Martin Hastedt; Lena Westendorf; André Niebel; Maximilian Methling; Maria Kristina Parr; Michael Tsokos Journal: Forensic Sci Med Pathol Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 2.007
Authors: Hernâni Marques; Pedro Cruz-Vicente; Tiago Rosado; Mário Barroso; Luís A Passarinha; Eugenia Gallardo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Tanja Restin; Nastassja Byland; Clarissa D Voegel; Pearl La Marca-Ghaemmaghami; Markus R Baumgartner; Dirk Bassler; Thomas Kraemer; Tina M Binz Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 4.478
Authors: Ramazan Akçan; Burak Taştekin; Mahmut Şerif Yildirim; Halit Canberk Aydogan; Necdet Sağlam Journal: Turk J Med Sci Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 0.973