Literature DB >> 25036914

Contemporary practice patterns associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy among certifying urologists.

Gautam Jayram1, Brian R Matlaga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for patients with complex stone burdens. We performed a study to assess the effect of urologist-specific parameters on the use of PCNL-both the access component of the procedure as well as the stone removal. We also examined trends in PCNL utilization over time.
METHODS: We analyzed self-reported 6-month case logs submitted to The American Board of Urology (ABU) for urologists who certified or recertified between 2004 and 2013. Surgeons performing PCNL were identified by Current Procedural Terminology coding. Urologist-specific data, including fellowship training, practice type, and practice population, were used to further stratify this cohort. Trends were examined over the study period.
RESULTS: A total of 7278 urologists submitted case logs to the ABU between 2004 and 2013. The median ages of the initial certification group, first recertification group, and second recertification group were 36.0, 43.7, and 53 years, respectively. A greater proportion of newly certified urologists performed PCNL (53%) compared with urologists in the first (41%) and second (29%) recertification groups; initially certified urologists were also more likely to be high volume (>10) PCNL surgeons. Urologists with fellowship training were more likely to use PCNL (66%) and be high-volume surgeons (26.4%). PCNL utilization increased significantly during the study period, with 1330 procedures performed in 2004 and 2888 procedures performed in 2012 (117% increase).
CONCLUSIONS: Younger and fellowship-trained urologists are the primary users of PCNL; the majority of senior urologists do not perform this operation. Overall, the use of PCNL and urologist-directed access has increased in the previous decade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25036914     DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

1.  Ureteroscopic holmium laser-assisted retrograde nephrostomy access: a novel approach to percutaneous stone removal.

Authors:  Kamaljot S Kaler; Egor Parkhomenko; Zhamshid Okunohov; Roshan M Patel; Jaime Landman; Ralph V Clayman; Carlos A Uribe
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Current trends in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an internet-based survey.

Authors:  Abd Alrahman Ahmad; Omar Alhunaidi; Mohamed Aziz; Mohamed Omar; Ahmed M Al-Kandari; Ahmed El-Nahas; Mohamed El-Shazly
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-08-15

3.  Fellowship training in endourology: Impact on percutaneous nephrolithotomy access patterns.

Authors:  Jennifer Saluk; Joshua Ebel; Justin Rose; Tasha Posid; Michael Sourial; Bodo Knudsen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Is extended preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk patients necessary before percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Aaron M Potretzke; Alyssa M Park; Tyler M Bauman; Jeffrey A Larson; Joel M Vetter; Brian M Benway; Alana C Desai
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-10-24

5.  Differences in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy practice patterns among Latin American urologists with and without endourology training.

Authors:  Braulio O Manzo; Edgar Lozada; Fabio C Vicentini; Francisco Javier Sanchez; Gildardo Manzo
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.