Successful single-cell isolation is a primary step for subsequent chemical and biological analyses of single cells. Conventional single-cell isolation methods often encounter operational complexity, limited efficiency, deterioration of cell viability, incompetence in the isolation of a single-cell into nanoliter liquid, and/or inability to select single adherent cells with specific phenotypes. Here, we develop a hand-held single-cell pipet (hSCP) that is rapid, operationally simple, highly efficient, and inexpensive for unbiased isolation of single viable suspended cells directly from submicroliter cell suspensions into nanoliter droplets without the assistance of any additional equipment. An integrated SCP (iSCP) has also been developed for selective isolation of single suspended and adherent cells according to the fluorescence imaging and morphological features. The isolated single cells can be conveniently transferred into standard 96-/384-well plates, Petri dishes, or vials for cloning, PCR, and other single-cell biochemical assays.
Successful single-cell isolation is a primary step for subsequent chemical and biological analyses of single cells. Conventional single-cell isolation methods often encounter operational complexity, limited efficiency, deterioration of cell viability, incompetence in the isolation of a single-cell into nanoliter liquid, and/or inability to select single adherent cells with specific phenotypes. Here, we develop a hand-held single-cell pipet (hSCP) that is rapid, operationally simple, highly efficient, and inexpensive for unbiased isolation of single viable suspended cells directly from submicroliter cell suspensions into nanoliter droplets without the assistance of any additional equipment. An integrated SCP (iSCP) has also been developed for selective isolation of single suspended and adherent cells according to the fluorescence imaging and morphological features. The isolated single cells can be conveniently transferred into standard 96-/384-well plates, Petri dishes, or vials for cloning, PCR, and other single-cell biochemical assays.
Due to cellular heterogeneity,
information collected from cell populations represents averaged values,
potentially masking important but rare events, such as dramatic variations
in gene expression at the single-cell level.[1] Molecular analyses of single cells are required to better understand
the function and development of heterogeneous cell populations, including
cancer cells, stem cells, immune cells, and other functional cells.[2−7] The successful isolation of live single cells from these cell populations
followed by maintenance of cell viability and transfer into a designated
container with extremely low volume (<1 μL) is the first
and key step for downstream cellular and molecular analyses including
single-cell cloning,[8] PCR,[9] protein expression,[10] and gene
sequencing.[11−13] Currently, four main approaches are available for
single-cell isolation: serial dilution,[14] micromanipulation (including mouth pipet),[13,15] fluorescence-activated cell sorting,[16] and laser-capture microdissection.[17] These
strategies are plagued by time spent, operational
complexity, limited efficiency, deterioration of cell viability, incompetence
in the isolation of single cells into nanoliter liquids, inability
to select single adherent cells with distinct phenotypes, and/or the
requirement of expensive instruments.Design and mechanism of the hand-held single-cell pipet (hSCP).
(a) The hSCP involves one dual-channel pipet and one hSCP tip. A magnified
hook for single-cell capture is shown. (b) A single calcein-labeled
SK-BR-3 cell is isolated directly from a dense cell suspension by
hSCP. (c) The hSCP tip with a conical end and two magnified tip ends
shown before and after extrusion of aqueous solution. (d) Work flow
for single-cell isolation using hSCP. Scale bar, 200 μm.New methods for cell manipulation are necessary for advanced techniques
in single-cell biochemical analysis.[18] Recently,
microfluidic technologies have been developed to handle single cells
in integrated devices;[4,8−10,19−24] however a direct and stand-alone approach for the isolation and
transfer of single cells into standard 96-/384-well plates, Petri
dishes, or vials remains unavailable. Here, we describe the development
of a hand-held single-cell pipet (hSCP) that enables rapid, convenient,
and highly efficient isolation of live single suspended cells directly
from microliter or even nanoliter cell suspensions. After initial
isolation, the hSCP conveniently transfers the single-cell droplets
into designated containers (Figure 1, Movies
S1, S2 (Supporting Information (SI))).
Figure 1
Design and mechanism of the hand-held single-cell pipet (hSCP).
(a) The hSCP involves one dual-channel pipet and one hSCP tip. A magnified
hook for single-cell capture is shown. (b) A single calcein-labeled
SK-BR-3 cell is isolated directly from a dense cell suspension by
hSCP. (c) The hSCP tip with a conical end and two magnified tip ends
shown before and after extrusion of aqueous solution. (d) Work flow
for single-cell isolation using hSCP. Scale bar, 200 μm.
The hSCP is a dual-channel pipet with dimensions similar to those
of a hand-held air-displacement pipet (hADP; Figure S1 (SI)). The hSCP contains a negative-pressure channel
(−P) operated by pulling the left knob and a positive-pressure
channel (+P) operated by pushing the right knob (Figure 1a), and these channels transfer one cell during each operation
(Figure 1b). The hSCP tip was designed using
AutoCAD and was fabricated by photolithography and polydimethylsiloxane
(PDMS) molding techniques. The tip contains two ports (−P and
+P) connected to the two hSCP channels, one Y-shaped microchannel,
and one microscale hook with the open end pointing to the tip end
(Figure S2 (SI)). The hSCP tip end is a
conical shape with a 5 mm length and an approximately 300 μm
minimal width, allowing direct sampling from 500 nL cell suspensions
(Figures 1c, S3 (SI)).The hSCP-mediated cell transfer mechanism employs a procedure similar
to that of hADP-mediated liquid transfer (Figure S4 (SI)) in order to minimize operational complexity and cost
(<$1). Single-cell transfer is achieved in four steps (Figure 1d): preparation, capture, washing, and release and
transfer. (1) Preparation. Both hSCP channels are prefilled with 200–500
μL of cell-free medium. The hSCP tip is first assembled on the
hSCP by connecting the two loading ports to the −P and +P channels.
A gentle push on the +P knob drives the medium into the Y-shaped microchannel
and replaces the air trapped in the hSCP tip. An approximately 300
nL droplet forms on the hSCP tip and is reserved as the contact point
for aspirating the cell suspension. The droplet at the hSCP tip always
forms a tiny sphere shape due to the PDMS hydrophobicity. (2) Capture.
A 0.5–2 μL cell suspension (106–107 cells/mL) is aspirated into the upright microchannel by pulling
the −P knob on the hSCP. Because of the flowing network design,
no cells flow into the side microchannel (Figure S5a (SI)), and only one cell is captured by the single
hook. The size and shape of the hooks have been optimized to effectively
capture single cells in the size range of 8–20 μm.[19] (3) Washing. The hSCP tip is quickly dipped
into cell-free medium while pulling the −P knob, which washes
out the uncaptured cells to the −P port (Figure S5b (SI)). (4) Release and transfer. As PDMS is not
adhesive to cells, the captured single cells are easily released into
nanoliter droplets by applying a gentle pushing force to the +P port
(Figure S5c (SI)). Subsequently, single-cell
droplets are conveniently transferred into designated containers,
such as standard 96-/384-well plates, Petri dishes, and vials. Only
one pressure source is applied in each step. The entire procedure
can be completed within 10 s.Two flow paths around the hook are possible. The capture path has
a narrow gap, whereas the bypass path has a wide gap (Figure S2 (SI)). Numerical simulations of the flow profile
show that the flow rate along the bypass path is much greater than
that along the capture path (Figure 2a). This
indicates that single cells preferentially flow along the bypass path
and are not captured (Figure S6 (SI)),
although a single cell is occasionally captured due to the laminar-flow
effect (Figure S7, Movie S3 (SI)). In most
cases, single-cell capture occurs only when the bypass path is temporarily
blocked by other cells (Figure S8 (SI)).
A model of single-cell capture was proposed based on the principle
of temporary blocking (Figure 2b). Then, various
parameters were investigated to determine the optimum conditions for
single-cell capture, including fluid-resistance ratios, aspiration
time, and cell concentration (Figures 2c–d,
S9 (SI)).
Figure 2
Optimization and characterization of hSCP for single-cell manipulation.
(a) Numerical simulation of flow profile around the hook. (b) Model
of single-cell capture by hook. Wb, width
of bypass path; Lb, length of bypass path; D, diameter of cell. Single-cell capture efficiency under
various fluid-resistance ratios (Rc/Rb) (c) as well as aspiration times and cell
concentrations (d). Rc, fluid resistance
of capture path; Rb, fluid resistance
of bypass path. (e) Single-cell droplet volume evaluation. The average
value (343 nL) is indicated by the red dotted line. (f) Quantitative
single-cell isolation including 2, 3, 5, and 10 cells. The single
cells are indicated by white dotted circles. Cells are SK-BR-3 (b–d)
and MDA-MB-231/GFP (e–f). Scale bar, 200 μm.
Optimization and characterization of hSCP for single-cell manipulation.
(a) Numerical simulation of flow profile around the hook. (b) Model
of single-cell capture by hook. Wb, width
of bypass path; Lb, length of bypass path; D, diameter of cell. Single-cell capture efficiency under
various fluid-resistance ratios (Rc/Rb) (c) as well as aspiration times and cell
concentrations (d). Rc, fluid resistance
of capture path; Rb, fluid resistance
of bypass path. (e) Single-cell droplet volume evaluation. The average
value (343 nL) is indicated by the red dotted line. (f) Quantitative
single-cell isolation including 2, 3, 5, and 10 cells. The single
cells are indicated by white dotted circles. Cells are SK-BR-3 (b–d)
and MDA-MB-231/GFP (e–f). Scale bar, 200 μm.The results of these investigations revealed that the highest capture
efficiencies were achieved when the width of the bypass path (Wb) was 1.67 times the average cell diameter
(D; Table S1 (SI)). Under
these conditions, the included angle (α) between the x-axis and the line intersecting the nuclei of two cells
was 45° (Figure 2b). With the optimum Wb, the ratio of fluid resistance along the capture
path (Rc) to fluid resistance along the
bypass path (Rb) was decreased by increasing
the length of the bypass path (Lb) (Figure
S9b (SI)). This alteration may increase
the probability of cells flowing into the hook and becoming captured;
however, the position of the captured single cell was not stable under
the fluid force, and the cell was easily deformed and squeezed out
from the hook, resulting in low capture efficiency (Table S2, Movie
S4 (SI)). By contrast, captured single
cells remained stable in hooks (Rc/Rb = 36) even with a flow velocity of 1 m/s.
Thus, high efficiency (>95%) single-cell capture could be maintained
by manual operation. Denser cell suspensions and greater aspiration
times significantly increased the probability of single-cell capture
(Figure 2d). Therefore, centrifugal enrichment
was applied before aspiration for cell suspensions with concentrations
below 106/mL. The presence of 1000 cells was considered
acceptable because the hSCP can directly sample from less than 1 μL
of a cell suspension. The single-cell capture efficiency was as high
as 96.7% under conditions of Rc/Rb = 36, a 5 s aspiration time, and a cell suspension
concentration of 107/mL. For rare cells, a pressure control
system, such as a syringe pump, is recommended to replace manual operation
to generate a weak and constant −P, in which case individual
cells prefer to flow along the capture path due to Rc/Rb <1 while the captured
single cell squeezing out of the hook is avoided. The hSCP can also
combine with well-established cell enrichment methods, such as FACS
and magnetic separation, for improved target single cell isolation.After efficient capture by hooks, single cells could be easily
released into nanoliter droplets by hSCP. In order to measure the
precise volume, a single-cell droplet was first deposited onto a Petri
dish by hSCP and then rapidly weighed by a precise electronic balance.
The volume was calculated by assuming a droplet density of 1 mg/μL.
A total of 10 single-cell droplets were optically imaged and weighed.
All the volumes of single-cell droplets were calculated as <500
nL, and the average value was 343 nL (Figure 2e). Moreover, any defined cell numbers, such as 2, 3, 5 and 10, could
easily be achieved with the hSCP attached to specially designed hSCP
tips (Figures 2f, S10 (SI)). The capability to acquire a defined number of cells
is useful for replacing the existing tedious and inaccurate serial
dilution method for cell number-dependent research, such as validation
of gene amplification linearity and testing of circulating tumor cell
capture efficiency.[25]The hSCP is compatible with commercial tissue culture plates, as
demonstrated by the distribution of single cells into a 4 × 4
array region in a 384-well plate (Figure S11 (SI)). The viability of seeded single cells is high because
the fluid shear stress around the captured cells is maintained in
a low range (Figure S12 (SI)). The hSCP
was first used for the distribution of single cells into 96-well plates
for cloning analysis. After seeding, the single MDA-MB-231/GFP cells
proliferated normally (Figure S13 (SI)).
Subsequently, 50 single MDA-MB-231/GFP cells were plated in the wells
of a 384-well plate filled with 80 μL of fresh medium in advance,
and cell counts at various time points were determined (Figure 3a). Cell heterogeneity was an obvious factor in
single-cell cloning. Interestingly, 18% of the single cells did not
divide during this period or died and 10% of them divided only once
while other cells had average doubling times[8] of 28 h. The minimum doubling time was 20 h, and the maximum doubling
time was 76 h (Figure 3b). Such a cell-doubling
assay confirmed heterogeneity in cell proliferation. Note that clonal
growth of a single cell can be promoted by using conditioned medium
containing cytokines produced by the same cell population to replace
fresh medium.
Figure 3
Single-cell cloning and PCR. (a) Cell numbers per clone versus
time. (b) Distribution of average doubling time of clonal cells. Only
cell numbers over 2 are calculated. (c) Analysis of 2% whole-genome
DNA amplification from a single cell after 25 cycles. MDA-MB-231/GFP
cells were used.
Single-cell cloning and PCR. (a) Cell numbers per clone versus
time. (b) Distribution of average doubling time of clonal cells. Only
cell numbers over 2 are calculated. (c) Analysis of 2% whole-genome
DNA amplification from a single cell after 25 cycles. MDA-MB-231/GFP
cells were used.The hSCP was also successful for application in single-cell PCR
analysis, in which single cells require isolation and lysis in the
smallest possible volume. As a proof-of-concept experiment, one SUM
159 cell was first captured, then released into a nanoliter droplet,
and finally transferred into a PCR vial by hSCP. After single-cell
lysis, DNA fragmentation, and DNA amplification, the quality of the
whole-genome amplification was determined by separation of 2% of the
PCR product volume onto a 3% agarose gel (Figure 3c). The negative control (no cell) lacked visible bands while
the positive control (single cell isolated by hSCP) migrated as a
wide band of DNA primarily ranging from 300 to 1500 bp. The PCR products
of the genomic DNA can be used for downstream applications such as
sequencing and single nucleotide polymorphism analysis.Design and mechanism of the integrated single-cell pipet (iSCP).
(a) A rounded PDMS slab containing 50-plex iSCP tips was placed on
a commercially available polystyrene Petri dish; red dye was injected
to aid visualization. (b) Work flow of iSCP for selective isolation
of single suspended and adherent cells. (c) Sequential images of single
adherent cell release. After 3 h in culture, the single MDA-MB-231
cell in the 32nd iSCP tip displayed obvious adherent morphology and
was then released by loading trypsin solution into the port connected
to the bypass microchannel. (d) A plot of the lengths of 50 MDA-MB-231/GFP
cells after 3 h in culture within the 50-plex iSCP-tips. The minimum
cell length is 27 μm, and the maximum cell length is 165 μm.
Average cell length (83 μm) is indicated by the red dotted line.The hSCP provides unbiased isolation of single suspended cells
and can be combined with statistical downstream single-cell analysis
for cell heterogeneity studies. In other situations, selective isolation
and analysis of single suspended and adherent cells[10,26] via fluorescence imaging and morphological observation are required,
and these two needs can be simultaneously met by integrated SCP (iSCP;
Figure 4). In this setup, the 50-plex iSCP
tips are evenly distributed into a round PDMS slab and share the same
cell inlet/outlet (Figures 4a, S14 (SI)). The PDMS slab is placed onto a Petri dish
or a glass slide without thermal or oxygen plasma treatment, allowing
the captured single suspended cells to immediately image and spread
for subsequent morphological phenotype identification. The work flow
of selective iSCP is similar to the operation of the unbiased hSCP
(Figures 4b, S15 (SI)). The main difference is that the captured single cells were allowed
to adhere and spread normally within the iSCP tips. Cells can be morphologically
heterogeneous, and morphological features of single cells can be easily
identified under a microscope. After selection, the target single
adherent cell is released into the cell outlet using trypsin loaded
into the port connected to the bypass microchannel followed by transfer
into a designated container via hADP (Figure 4c). The iSCP is easy to operate and can achieve close to 100% isolation
of 50 single suspended cells within 1 min. After approximately 3 h
in culture, the thin and long membrane protrusions of 50 single cells
can be clearly identified under a fluorescence microscope (Figures 4d, S16 (SI)).
Figure 4
Design and mechanism of the integrated single-cell pipet (iSCP).
(a) A rounded PDMS slab containing 50-plex iSCP tips was placed on
a commercially available polystyrene Petri dish; red dye was injected
to aid visualization. (b) Work flow of iSCP for selective isolation
of single suspended and adherent cells. (c) Sequential images of single
adherent cell release. After 3 h in culture, the single MDA-MB-231
cell in the 32nd iSCP tip displayed obvious adherent morphology and
was then released by loading trypsin solution into the port connected
to the bypass microchannel. (d) A plot of the lengths of 50 MDA-MB-231/GFP
cells after 3 h in culture within the 50-plex iSCP-tips. The minimum
cell length is 27 μm, and the maximum cell length is 165 μm.
Average cell length (83 μm) is indicated by the red dotted line.
We recently found that breast cancer cells with the longest protrusions
often exhibit the strongest metastatic and invasive capabilities.[19] Therefore, the iSCP may be used to selectively
isolate distinct single adherent cells according to their protrusion
generation ability and used for downstream gene analyses, which may
facilitate the study of genotype–phenotype relationships.[10,27,28] In order to improve the quality
of statistical data, integration of 100 hSCPs into one iSCP might
be achieved by further optimizing the chip design. Moreover, the captured
single cells can proliferate normally within the iSCP tips and can
be utilized for long-term single-cell tracking assays (Figure S17
(SI)). Finally, a comprehensive comparison
of h/iSCP with conventional single-cell isolation methods is presented
(Table S3 (SI)).In summary, we describe an hSCP for unbiased isolation of single
suspended cells directly from cell suspensions, and this novel method
has key features of speed, high efficiency, maintenance of cell viability,
and low cost. This direct and stand-alone approach can be easily operated
with one hand without the assistance of any additional equipment.
The hSCP has the ability to sample directly from submicroliter cell
suspensions and release the captured single cells into droplets smaller
than 500 nL. The extremely small final single-cell suspension volumes
are ideal microreactors for performing chemical and biological analyses
of single cells. Furthermore, any defined cell number is attainable
using an hSCP attached with specially designed hSCP tips, potentially
providing an approach for quantitative cell analysis. In addition
to the unbiased isolation of single suspended cells, selective isolation
of single suspended or adherent cells can also be achieved via an
iSCP. These methods provide novel tools for future biochemical and
biological research, wherein simple and efficient transportation of
single or defined numbers of suspended or adherent cells is required.
Authors: Georgina To'a Salazar; Yuli Wang; Grace Young; Mark Bachman; Christopher E Sims; G P Li; Nancy L Allbritton Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2007-01-15 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Artem K Efremov; Anand Radhakrishnan; David S Tsao; Carol S Bookwalter; Kathleen M Trybus; Michael R Diehl Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J G Toma; M Akhavan; K J Fernandes; F Barnabé-Heider; A Sadikot; D R Kaplan; F D Miller Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Sunitha Nagrath; Lecia V Sequist; Shyamala Maheswaran; Daphne W Bell; Daniel Irimia; Lindsey Ulkus; Matthew R Smith; Eunice L Kwak; Subba Digumarthy; Alona Muzikansky; Paula Ryan; Ulysses J Balis; Ronald G Tompkins; Daniel A Haber; Mehmet Toner Journal: Nature Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Pengchao Zhang; Xin Han; Jun Yao; Ning Shao; Kai Zhang; Yufu Zhou; Youli Zu; Bin Wang; Lidong Qin Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Yuling Qin; Li Wu; Thomas Schneider; Gloria S Yen; Jiasi Wang; Shihan Xu; Min Li; Amy L Paguirigan; Jordan L Smith; Jerald P Radich; Robbyn K Anand; Daniel T Chiu Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-07-27 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Andre Gross; Jonas Schoendube; Stefan Zimmermann; Maximilian Steeb; Roland Zengerle; Peter Koltay Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 5.923