Paralytic shellfish poisoning: a case series.

We describe a case series of seven patients presenting to an emergency department with symptoms of paralytic shellfish poisoning. They developed varying degrees of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weakness, ataxia and paresthesias after eating mussels harvested from a beach near their resort. Four patients were admitted to the hospital, one due to increasing respiratory failure requiring endotracheal intubation and the remainder for respiratory monitoring. All patients made a full recovery, most within 24 hours. The ability to recognize and identify paralytic shellfish poisoning and manage its complications are important to providers of emergency medicine.

INTRODUCTION

Paralytic shellfish poisoning is a foodborne illness that typically develops after consumption of shellfish contaminated with saxitoxin. During blooms of toxic algae, especially dinoflagellates of the genera Alexandrium, feeding molluscan bivalves and other shellfish concentrate the toxin and are unsafe to consume.1 Within hours of eating shellfish contaminated with toxic levels of saxitoxin, victims develop gastrointestinal distress and neurological symptoms, ranging from benign circumoral paresthesias and tingling of the extremities to ataxia, dysphagia, and changes in mental status.2 Many patients describe a sensation of “floating” or dissociation. Hypertension and tachycardia have been reported.3 While most patients recover without treatment, weakness may rapidly progress to respiratory paralysis and asphyxiation. Currently there are no antidotes to saxitoxin and treatment is supportive.1

While much is known about saxitoxin and its relationship to blooms of toxic dinoflagellates, reports of paralytic shellfish poisoning and descriptions of findings in its victims are infrequent in the medical literature. We describe seven patients with presumed paralytic shellfish poisoning, including one requiring intubation and respiratory support. Patients with paralytic shellfish poisoning most often present in coastal locations, but the international distribution of shellfish as a food substance expands the risk of paralytic shellfish poisoning to anywhere in the world. Knowledge of all shellfish poisoning syndromes is important, but the ability of the emergency medicine provider to recognize paralytic shellfish poisoning facilitates the anticipation and management of potentially rapidly progressive muscle paralysis and respiratory arrest.

CASE SERIES

The poison center was contacted by emergency medicine staff at a community hospital regarding management of seven patients presenting with suspected paralytic shellfish poisoning. The patients were part of a group visiting the area and staying at a nearby resort. Around midnight, they harvested mussels on the beach near their hotel and prepared them in a soup which they ate between midnight and 2 a.m. Approximately 1–2 hours later, they began experiencing various symptoms: peripheral paresthesias (7/7), nausea (5/7), vomiting (4/7), diarrhea (3/7), ataxia (3/7), weakness (2/7), and shortness of breath (1/7). There were 4 males and 3 females, aged 19 to 67 years. The most affected was a 62 year old female who developed dysarthria and a floating sensation in addition to nausea and vomiting. She was transported by emergency medical services after she became ataxic, fell and could not stand up. At the hospital, her exam revealed pronounced dysarthria and diminished gag reflex in addition to her subjective dyspnea, oral paresthesia, and sensation of her throat closing up. Due to concerns of impending airway compromise, the patient was emergently intubated, placed on a ventilator, and transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). Her laboratory results were remarkable only for hypokalemia (2.5 mmol/L) which improved with repletion. She was extubated after 24 hours and then discharged home in good condition the following day.

The etiology of her low potassium is uncertain and a literature search failed to find any known association with saxitoxin. Gastrointestinal loss from vomiting and diarrhea is unlikely considering the short duration of the symptoms. There was no documentation of beta agonists given in the Emergency Department; however emergency medical services records were not available and therefore unknown if any medications given en route. Since the patient was on an antihypertensive medication (patient did not know which one), she may have had underlying sub-acute or chronic hypokalemia. Basic electrolytes were checked on all of the patients and no one else exhibited hypokalemia, results ranged from 3.7 to 4.1 mmol/L.

After the initial patient was intubated, all remaining patients had serial peak flow measurements obtained (Table). The expected normal values based on heights and weights were not included in the records. Only patient “F” had height and weight recorded, allowing calculation of expected peak flow rate. His effort of 470 Liters per minute was 89% of expected per standard peak flow chart. Six of the patients were hypertensive, either at triage or during their hospital course. Tachycardia was present in four patients, three at triage and one later in the emergency department.

Table

Serial peak flow measurements obtained after initial patient was intubated.

Patient age/gender	Symptoms	Triage vital signs	Peak blood pressure, mm Hg	Peak heartrate, bpm	Vital signs at time of disposition	Peak Flow Rates*	Admitted?
A	Dizzy, nausea	118/75	165/117	100	109/78	325	No
19		HR 95			HR 74	370
Female		RR16			RR12	380
		96% RA			97% RA
B	Vomiting, diarrhea, facial numbness, ataxia, arm & leg weakness	149/10	151/87	93	99/58	290	ICU
43		HR 92			HR 67	280
Female		RR16			RR16	320
		99% RA			99% RA	330
C	Vomiting, paresthesia	192/119	192/119	110	156/106	310	ICU
47		HR 110			HR 101	300
Male		RR14			RR18	275
		99% RA			96% RA	275
D	Facial & fingertip paresthesia	149/100	158/95	89	158/95	450	No
67		HR 86 RR12			HR 87	400
Male		97% RA			98% RA	500
E	Floating sensation, dizzy, vomiting, diarrhea, facial & fingertip paresthesias	153/113	163/107	96	159/92	400	ICU
49		HR 96			HR 95	450
Male		RR12			RR15
		96% RA			99% RA
F	Facial & fingertip paresthesia, dizzy	129/87	129/87	112	118/62	420	No
52		HR 112			HR 86	470
Male		RR16			RR14
		97% RA			96% RA
G	Floating sensation, dyspnea, vomiting, diarrhea	175/84	226/128	123	114/72	none	ICU (Intubated)
62		HR 97			HR 96
Female		RR16			RR20
		100% RA			100% (vent)

HR, heart rate; RR, respiration rate; bpm, beats per minute; ICU, intensive care unit; RA, room air

Three patients were admitted to the ICU for monitoring of respiratory status and were subsequently discharged within 24 hours. The remaining patients were evaluated in the emergency department, monitored, and discharged with resolved or resolving symptoms. No urine or serum saxitoxin levels were obtained from the patients. The beach where the family had harvested their mussels was under restriction for collecting shellfish due to elevated saxitoxin levels; however the patients failed to see the Department of Health notice due to the darkness. On 24 September 2012, the day after the patients’ presentation, saxitoxin levels obtained from shellfish from the beach were found to average 6250 mcg/100 gm of shellfish meat (Figure).

Figure

Saxitoxin levels found in shellfish meat.

DISCUSSION

Shellfish poisoning occurs after ingestion of organisms contaminated by infectious agents or concentrated toxins. Toxins concentrated in the flesh of shellfish can produce syndromes that include paralytic shellfish poisoning, amnesic shellfish poisoning, diarrheic shellfish poisoning, and neurologic shellfish poisoning.1 Shellfish poisoning syndromes provide a confusing array of overlapping signs and symptoms. Providers may fail to recognize these syndromes and may attribute findings to cerebrovascular events, intoxication, psychiatric illness, or other disorders.4

Paralytic shellfish poisoning is a growing problem worldwide and occurs seasonally in the coastal United States.5 Saxitoxin is produced by certain dinoflagellates and concentrated in the flesh of filter feeding mollusks, including clams, oysters, and mussels. These dinoflagellates are bloom-forming microalgae that thrive in calm, warm waters. They include about ten Alexandrium species in the waters surrounding the United States. Dinoflagellate blooms are commonly called “red tide,” but can occur with other color changes in water (green, brown, or yellow) and toxic levels of saxitoxin can occur in clear-appearing water. This has led to the recommendation that such events be called “harmful algal blooms” instead of “red tides.”6,7 First isolated from butter clams (Saxidomus gigantea), saxitoxin is a potent neurotoxin three orders of magnitude more toxic than sodium cyanide (Lethal Dose 50: saxitoxin 10mcg/kg, cyanide 10mg/kg).8,9 Saxitoxin has also been associated with pufferfish, cyanobacteria, and other marine animals.10

Consumption of saxitoxin from any source produces a syndrome through the blockade of voltage-gated fast sodium channels, inhibiting signal propagation in neural tissue.1 Symptoms commonly include paresthesias of the mouth, face, and lips; odd feelings of floating; tingling of the extremities; and rapidly-progressive weakness and paralysis. Gastrointestinal distress occurs in many victims and hypertension is commonly seen in paralytic shellfish poisoning patients.3 Most victims fully recover without medical care, but some need control of gastrointestinal distress, and some require airway control and mechanical ventilation.4 Predictors of the severity of neurological toxicity have not been identified. Symptom onset is rapid, usually within the first 1–2 hours, and recovery within 24 to 48 hours. Some patients describe fatigue for several days after paralytic shellfish poisoning.1

The diagnosis of paralytic shellfish poisoning is almost always made clinically, but can be confirmed by measurement of saxitoxin levels either in the shellfish meat or the patient’s urine or serum.11 In our case series, the diagnosis was based on clinical presentation, geographic location, and temporal association with eating bivalves from a beach with known toxic levels of saxitoxin. The Washington Department of Health (DOH) became involved at the onset of the case and tested shellfish from that beach for saxitoxin, domoic acid, & okadaic acid; only saxitoxin was above the safety threshold and measured 6025 mcg/100 gm (beaches are closed when levels are greater than 80 mcg/100 gm). During the course of its investigation, the DOH determined that paralytic shellfish poisoning was the causative agent. Although other toxins, especially tetrodotoxin, ciquatoxin, and brevetoxin can cause a similar constellation of symptoms, these are very unlikely since not endemic to this particular location and the onset occurred after eating mussels caught locally. In addition, the neurologic symptoms make a food borne illness such as Vibrio species unlikely. Chemical and nerve agents should also be considered, however, the short duration of symptoms and a known exposure to a biologic toxin, saxitoxin, makes this extremely unlikely as well.

Our cases of paralytic shellfish poisoning demonstrated the common findings of neurologic and gastrointestinal symptoms.3 Five of the seven patients were hypertensive at triage and the most symptomatic patient showed the highest blood pressure in the group. Only one patient did not develop hypertension. Four of the patients were monitored in an intensive care setting, one required airway control and mechanical ventilation. Two of the patients described the characteristic “floating sensation” frequently seen in paralytic shellfish poisoning. In addition, six patients had peak expiratory flow rates measured to evaluate and monitor ventilatory status. Of note, the peak expiratory flow rates of only two patients (A & B) progressively improved as symptoms resolved.

Three additional cases of suspected paralytic shellfish poisoning were identified by searching Washington Poison Center records from the 6-month period May to October 2012 for the key words “paralytic,” “shellfish,” “clams,” “mussels,” “oysters,” and “food poisoning.” The 10 cases of paralytic shellfish poisoning identified in Washington in 2012 represent a considerable increase over the average number reported in recent years (0–2 cases annually in Washington State since 1998). The actual number of cases of paralytic shellfish poisoning in Washington is likely underestimated, as many cases of paralytic shellfish poisoning go unreported.4

Saxitoxin levels are measured in shellfish collected from public beaches in Washington State every two weeks in the summer months.12 Symptoms usually develop in humans at saxitoxin levels significantly above 80 mcg per gram of shellfish meat.13 When saxitoxin levels exceed 80 mcg per 100 gram of shellfish meat, beaches are closed, marked with signs, and identified on the Washington State Shellfish Program website.12 Such closures occur annually on the coastal areas of Washington; however the beaches of southern Puget Sound usually remain open. The summer of 2012 was unique with many days of sun and light wind in the Puget Sound, and may have promoted the growth of Alexandrium, necessitating beach closure much further south than usual.

Paralytic shellfish poisoning is a preventable condition. Because commercially harvested shellfish are routinely tested for saxitoxin, victims are typically hobbyists, collecting clams or mussels from local beaches. While avoiding non-commercially harvested shellfish is the best way to prevent paralytic shellfish poisoning, shellfish harvesting is a common practice for some citizens of Washington State and a cultural tradition for many members of the Pacific Northwest native tribes. The patients identified in this series harvested mussels in darkness and did not see warning signs posted on the beach. None of the victims checked the Washington State Shellfish Program website – they reported a practice of collecting squid and shellfish annually from that site and never needing to check for beach closure in the past. The unusual closure of southern Puget Sound beaches in 2012, failure to review online information, and darkness obscuring posted warning signs contributed to this outbreak of paralytic shellfish poisoning.

Patients with shellfish poisoning most often present in coastal locations. Knowledge of these syndromes and the ability to recognize them is important to Emergency Medicine providers in coastal areas. However, the wide distribution of shellfish as a food product makes knowledge of shellfish poisoning syndromes, especially paralytic shellfish poisoning with its risk of rapidly progressive paralysis of respiratory muscles and need for ventilation, important to all Emergency Medicine providers regardless of their location. Prompt recognition of cases of paralytic shellfish poisoning can prevent complications and death in individual patients, and provide an opportunity to limit the impact of an outbreak by coordinating investigation and intervention with the local health department and poison control center.