Literature DB >> 25035414

Major geographical variations in elective coronary revascularization by stents or surgery in England.

Sheharyar S Baig1, Douglas G Altman2, David P Taggart3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Revascularization in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) can be achieved through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) depending on the anatomical pattern of CAD, comorbidities and patient preference. Recent studies in the USA, Canada and Australia show marked local variation in the PCI/CABG ratio that is unexplained by patient-related factors. This current study assesses the geographical variation in elective coronary revascularization interventions across England and discusses its appropriateness.
METHODS: The rates and actual procedure numbers of total CABG, total PCIs and elective PCIs were collated for each of 151 primary care trusts (PCTs). The 'elective PCI/total CABG ratio' was taken as an indicator of elective coronary revascularization practices. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) for PCTs was taken as a marker of deprivation.
RESULTS: In 2010/2011, the degree of variation in elective PCI/total CABG ratios across 151 PCTs in England was >13-fold (min = 0.36, max = 4.74, median = 1.19, interquartile range = 0.98, 1.73). The ratio was not correlated to the IMD 2010 rank of the PCTs (Spearman's ρ = 0.08, P = 0.36) and was not explained by the volume of interventions performed.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite clear evidence-based guidelines for intervention, marked geographical variation in elective coronary revascularization practices also exists in England. This variation is unexplained by procedure volume or deprivation, suggesting the contribution of unwarranted influences which may include practitioner preference. To reduce this level of unwarranted variation, we suggest that all interventions should be underpinned by internationally recognized guidelines or approved by a multidisciplinary team approach (The Heart Team).
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery bypass graft; Geographical variation; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Stent; Unwarranted variation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25035414     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  5 in total

1.  APpropriAteness of percutaneous Coronary interventions in patients with ischaemic HEart disease in Italy: the APACHE pilot study.

Authors:  Sergio Leonardi; Marcello Marino; Gabriele Crimi; Florinda Maiorana; Diego Rizzotti; Corrado Lettieri; Luca Bettari; Marco Zuccari; Paolo Sganzerla; Simone Tresoldi; Marianna Adamo; Sergio Ghiringhelli; Carlo Sponzilli; Giampaolo Pasquetto; Andrea Pavei; Luigi Pedon; Luciano Bassan; Mario Bollati; Paola Camisasca; Daniela Trabattoni; Marta Brancati; Arnaldo Poli; Claudio Panciroli; Maddalena Lettino; Giuseppe Tarelli; Giuseppe Tarantini; Leonardo De Luca; Ferdinando Varbella; Giuseppe Musumeci; Stefano De Servi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  The Role of Tomographic Ultrasonography in Conduit Mapping before Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Syed Mohammad Asim Hussain
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-11-21

3.  Variation in the use of percutaneous coronary interventions among older patients with acute coronary syndromes: a multilevel study in Fukuoka, Japan.

Authors:  Yunfei Li; Akira Babazono; Aziz Jamal; Takako Fujita; Shinichiro Yoshida; Sung-A Kim
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2021-03-16

4.  Factors associated with the rates of coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Agnus M Kim; Jong Heon Park; Seongcheol Cho; Sungchan Kang; Tae Ho Yoon; Yoon Kim
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  Exploring Current Evidence on the Past, the Present, and the Future of the Heart Team: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Alexandru Burlacu; Adrian Covic; Mircea Cinteza; Paula Madalina Lupu; Radu Deac; Grigore Tinica
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 3.023

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.