Literature DB >> 25035208

Role of FDG-PET in the implementation of involved-node radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma patients.

Théodore Girinsky1, Anne Aupérin2, Vincent Ribrag3, Manel Elleuch4, Christophe Fermé3, Guillaume Bonniaud5, Claude Ruelle6, Jean-Louis Alberini7, Aljosa Celebic2, Véronique Edeline8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examines the role of (18)F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the implementation of involved-node radiation therapy (INRT) in patients treated for clinical stages (CS) I/II supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). METHODS AND MATERIAL: Patients with untreated CS I/II HL enrolled in the randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL Intergroup H10 trial and participating in a real-time prospective quality assurance program were prospectively included in this study. Data were electronically obtained from 18 French cancer centers. All patients underwent APET-computed tomography (PET-CT) and a post-chemotherapy planning CT scanning. The pre-chemotherapy gross tumor volume (GTV) and the postchemotherapy clinical target volume (CTV) were first delineated on CT only by the radiation oncologist. The planning PET was then co-registered, and the delineated volumes were jointly analyzed by the radiation oncologist and the nuclear medicine physician. Lymph nodes undetected on CT but FDG-avid were recorded, and the previously determined GTV and CTV were modified according to FDG-PET results.
RESULTS: From March 2007 to February 2010, 135 patients were included in the study. PET-CT identified at least 1 additional FDG-avid lymph node in 95 of 135 patients (70.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 61.9%-77.9%) and 1 additional lymph node area in 55 of 135 patients (40.7%; 95% CI: 32.4%-49.5%). The mean increases in the GTV and CTV were 8.8% and 7.1%, respectively. The systematic addition of PET to CT led to a CTV increase in 60% of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-chemotherapy FDG-PET leads to significantly better INRT delineation without necessarily increasing radiation volumes.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25035208     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

Review 1.  The concept and evolution of involved site radiation therapy for lymphoma.

Authors:  Lena Specht; Joachim Yahalom
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Lymphoma: current status of clinical and preclinical imaging with radiolabeled antibodies.

Authors:  Christopher G England; Lixin Rui; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Patterns of failure of diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma patients after involved-site radiotherapy.

Authors:  Eva Holzhäuser; Maximilian Berlin; Daniel Wollschläger; Thomas Bezold; Arnulf Mayer; Georg Heß; Heinz Schmidberger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  Radiotherapy planning of lymphomas: role of metabolic imaging with PET/CT.

Authors:  Michael J McKay; Kim L Taubman; Szeting Lee; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.668

5.  CALGB 50604: risk-adapted treatment of nonbulky early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma based on interim PET.

Authors:  David J Straus; Sin-Ho Jung; Brandelyn Pitcher; Lale Kostakoglu; John C Grecula; Eric D Hsi; Heiko Schöder; Leslie L Popplewell; Julie E Chang; Craig H Moskowitz; Nina Wagner-Johnston; John P Leonard; Jonathan W Friedberg; Brad S Kahl; Bruce D Cheson; Nancy L Bartlett
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  The Use of Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Perspective.

Authors:  Robert H Press; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; James M Mountz; Brenda F Kurland; Richard L Wahl; Ella F Jones; Nola M Hylton; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Robert J Nordstrom; Lori Henderson; Karen A Kurdziel; Bhadrasain Vikram; Michael A Jacobs; Matthias Holdhoff; Edward Taylor; David A Jaffray; Lawrence H Schwartz; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan; Hannah M Linden; Philippe Lambin; Thomas J Dilling; Daniel L Rubin; Lubomir Hadjiiski; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Image-guided radiation therapy in lymphoma management.

Authors:  Tony Eng; Chul S Ha
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2015-09-30

8.  Importance of baseline PET/CT imaging on radiation field design and relapse rates in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Nick Figura; Stella Flampouri; Nancy P Mendenhall; Christopher G Morris; Barry McCook; Savas Ozdemir; William Slayton; Eric Sandler; Bradford S Hoppe
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-18

Review 9.  Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Beyond PET/CT in Hodgkin lymphoma: a comprehensive review of the role of imaging at initial presentation, during follow-up and for assessment of treatment-related complications.

Authors:  Abhishek R Keraliya; Sree Harsha Tirumani; Atul B Shinagare; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-04-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.