Ka-Fai Chung1, Branda Yee-Man Yu2, Kam-Ping Yung3, Wing-Fai Yeung4, Tommy H Ng5, Fiona Yan-Yee Ho6. 1. Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Electronic address: kfchung@hkucc.hku.hk. 2. Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Electronic address: branadyu@hku.hk. 3. Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Electronic address: yiris@hku.hk. 4. Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Electronic address: yeungwfj@hku.hk. 5. Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Electronic address: tommyn@hku.hk. 6. Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Electronic address: hoyy@hku.hk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: There are problems with the fatigue measures currently used in depressed patients. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) covering general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced activity and reduced motivation has been widely used in patients with cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome. To address the multidimensional nature of fatigue, we examined the validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the MFI-20 in major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Data were derived from a randomized controlled trial of acupuncture in 137 patients with partially remitted MDD. The test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct and concurrent validity and sensitivity to change of the MFI-20 were analyzed. RESULTS: The MFI-20 was found to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.89) and 1-week test-retest reliability (Pearson correlation of the total score=0.73). Factor analysis showed 5 factors, but the factor structure was different from that in medical conditions. The 2 most prominent factors, explaining 46% of the total variance, were both associated with physical and mental energy but different in directions. There were adequate concurrent validity and sensitivity to change as evidenced by the significant correlations between the MFI-20 scores and depressive and anxiety symptoms, general health and quality of life. CONCLUSION: The Chinese MFI-20 is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of fatigue in MDD patients with residual symptoms. The construct of fatigue in MDD seems to be different from that in medical conditions. Further studies are needed to examine the MFI-20 in MDD patients from other cultures.
OBJECTIVES: There are problems with the fatigue measures currently used in depressedpatients. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) covering general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced activity and reduced motivation has been widely used in patients with cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome. To address the multidimensional nature of fatigue, we examined the validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the MFI-20 in major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Data were derived from a randomized controlled trial of acupuncture in 137 patients with partially remitted MDD. The test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct and concurrent validity and sensitivity to change of the MFI-20 were analyzed. RESULTS: The MFI-20 was found to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.89) and 1-week test-retest reliability (Pearson correlation of the total score=0.73). Factor analysis showed 5 factors, but the factor structure was different from that in medical conditions. The 2 most prominent factors, explaining 46% of the total variance, were both associated with physical and mental energy but different in directions. There were adequate concurrent validity and sensitivity to change as evidenced by the significant correlations between the MFI-20 scores and depressive and anxiety symptoms, general health and quality of life. CONCLUSION: The Chinese MFI-20 is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of fatigue in MDDpatients with residual symptoms. The construct of fatigue in MDD seems to be different from that in medical conditions. Further studies are needed to examine the MFI-20 in MDDpatients from other cultures.
Authors: Jesús Díaz-García; Inmaculada González-Ponce; José Carlos Ponce-Bordón; Miguel Ángel López-Gajardo; Iván Ramírez-Bravo; Ana Rubio-Morales; Tomás García-Calvo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Yan Liu; Ji Shu Xian; Rui Wang; Kang Ma; Fei Li; Fei Long Wang; Xue Yang; Ning Mu; Kai Xu; Yu Lian Quan; Shi Wang; Ying Lai; Chuan Yan Yang; Teng Li; Yanchun Zhang; Binbin Tan; Hua Feng; Tu Nan Chen; Li Hua Wang Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-08-25 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Julija Gecaite-Stonciene; Adomas Bunevicius; Julius Burkauskas; Julija Brozaitiene; Julius Neverauskas; Narseta Mickuviene; Nijole Kazukauskiene Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 3.390