Literature DB >> 25034956

The Korean version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: a validation study.

Hyunsook Shin1, Chang Gi Park2, Kaka Shim3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The scarcity of reliable and valid evaluation tools targeting nursing students' learning outcomes including clinical judgment was identified as one of the barriers in advancing nursing knowledge and skills. However, few studies have assessed the validity and reliability of these tools.
OBJECTIVES: Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Korean language version of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR), a clinical judgment tool currently used in nursing simulation research and English speaking nursing societies. DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS: This was an observational study in which a cross-sectional designed survey was used to validate the Korean version of the LCJR (K-LCJR) in three universities in Seoul, South Korea with one hundred fifty two senior nursing students.
METHODS: All participants completed the established simulation coursework as well as the regular clinical rotation on pediatric nursing along with their assigned team. Students evaluated their clinical judgment from their simulation performance using the K-LCJR after completing a simulation session using high-fidelity simulators and standardized patients (SP). Audio-video enhancing equipment for the student's individual and group reflection was used.
RESULTS: Item analysis of K-LCJR results showed a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of between .897 and .909 and the overall internal consistency reliability coefficient was .910. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the four-factor K-LCJR composed by noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting was confirmed with a very good model fit to data, which demonstrated good construct validity.
CONCLUSIONS: The K-LCJR is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring clinical judgment in nursing students in Korea.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical judgment; Confirmatory factor analysis; Nursing practicum; Patient simulation; Tool validation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25034956     DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Today        ISSN: 0260-6917            Impact factor:   3.442


  3 in total

1.  Effectiveness of neonatal emergency nursing education through simulation training: Flipped learning based on Tanner's Clinical Judgement Model.

Authors:  Sun-Yi Yang
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-01-11

2.  Development and evaluation of clinical reasoning using 'think aloud' approach in pharmacy undergraduates - A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Faisal Altalhi; Abdulrhman Altalhi; Ziad Magliah; Zaid Abushal; Anas Althaqafi; Azzam Falemban; Ejaz Cheema; Inderpal Dehele; Majid Ali
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Evaluating the Clinical Reasoning of Student Health Professionals in Placement and Simulation Settings: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jennie Brentnall; Debbie Thackray; Belinda Judd
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.