Literature DB >> 25034751

An ecology of prestige in New York City: examining the relationships among population density, socio-economic status, group identity, and residential canopy cover.

J Morgan Grove1, Dexter H Locke, Jarlath P M O'Neil-Dunne.   

Abstract

Several social theories have been proposed to explain the uneven distribution of vegetation in urban residential areas: population density, social stratification, luxury effect, and ecology of prestige. We evaluate these theories using a combination of demographic and socio-economic predictors of vegetative cover on all residential lands in New York City. We use diverse data sources including the City's property database, time-series demographic and socio-economic data from the US Census, and land cover data from the University of Vermont's Spatial Analysis Lab (SAL). These data are analyzed using a multi-model inferential, spatial econometrics approach. We also examine the distribution of vegetation within distinct market categories using Claritas' Potential Rating Index for Zipcode Markets (PRIZM™) database. These categories can be disaggregated, corresponding to the four social theories. We compare the econometric and categorical results for validation. Models associated with ecology of prestige theory are more effective for predicting the distribution of vegetation. This suggests that private, residential patterns of vegetation, reflecting the consumption of environmentally relevant goods and services, are associated with different lifestyles and lifestages. Further, our spatial and temporal analyses suggest that there are significant spatial and temporal dependencies that have theoretical and methodological implications for understanding urban ecological systems. These findings may have policy implications. Decision makers may need to consider how to most effectively reach different social groups in terms of messages and messengers in order to advance land management practices and achieve urban sustainability.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25034751     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0310-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  4 in total

1.  Predicting opportunities for greening and patterns of vegetation on private urban lands.

Authors:  Austin R Troy; J Morgan Grove; Jarlath P M O'Neil-Dunne; Steward T A Pickett; Mary L Cadenasso
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Gardens in urbanizing rural areas reveal an unexpected floral diversity related to housing density.

Authors:  Audrey Marco; Thierry Dutoit; Magali Deschamps-Cottin; Jean-François Mauffrey; Michel Vennetier; Valérie Bertaudière-Montes
Journal:  C R Biol       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 1.583

3.  Assessing the homogenization of urban land management with an application to US residential lawn care.

Authors:  Colin Polsky; J Morgan Grove; Chris Knudson; Peter M Groffman; Neil Bettez; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Sharon J Hall; James B Heffernan; Sarah E Hobbie; Kelli L Larson; Jennifer L Morse; Christopher Neill; Kristen C Nelson; Laura A Ogden; Jarlath O'Neil-Dunne; Diane E Pataki; Rinku Roy Chowdhury; Meredith K Steele
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity.

Authors:  Diane Hope; Corinna Gries; Weixing Zhu; William F Fagan; Charles L Redman; Nancy B Grimm; Amy L Nelson; Chris Martin; Ann Kinzig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total
  12 in total

1.  Climate differentiates forest structure across a residential macrosystem.

Authors:  Alessandro Ossola; Matthew E Hopton
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Growing Canopy on a College Campus: Understanding Urban Forest Change through Archival Records and Aerial Photography.

Authors:  Lara A Roman; Jason P Fristensky; Theodore S Eisenman; Eric J Greenfield; Robert E Lundgren; Chloe E Cerwinka; David A Hewitt; Caitlin C Welsh
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  The relationship between urban forests and race: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shannon Lea Watkins; Ed Gerrish
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  The relationship between urban forests and income: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ed Gerrish; Shannon Lea Watkins
Journal:  Landsc Urban Plan       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.142

5.  Do Income, Race and Ethnicity, and Sprawl Influence the Greenspace-Human Health Link in City-Level Analyses? Findings from 496 Cities in the United States.

Authors:  Matthew H E M Browning; Alessandro Rigolon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Biodiversity and socioeconomics in the city: a review of the luxury effect.

Authors:  Misha Leong; Robert R Dunn; Michelle D Trautwein
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Vegetation communities on commercial developments are heterogenous and determined by development and landscaping decisions, not socioeconomics.

Authors:  Karen Dyson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Socio-ecological connectivity differs in magnitude and direction across urban landscapes.

Authors:  Monika Egerer; Nakisha Fouch; Elsa C Anderson; Mysha Clarke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Examining the distributional equity of urban tree canopy cover and ecosystem services across United States cities.

Authors:  Christopher B Riley; Mary M Gardiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The luxury effect beyond cities: bats respond to socioeconomic variation across landscapes.

Authors:  Han Li; Kevin A Parker; Matina C Kalcounis-Rueppell
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.