Literature DB >> 2503431

Is duodenal diverticulum a risk factor for sphincterotomy?

D Vaira1, J F Dowsett, A R Hatfield, S R Cairns, A A Polydorou, P B Cotton, P R Salmon, R C Russell.   

Abstract

It is uncertain whether ERCP and associated procedures are more difficult when the papilla is inside or adjacent to a duodenal diverticulum. We have therefore reviewed the data from 2458 consecutive, prospectively reported ERCPs between November 1983 and March 1988. Three hundred and eight patients (12.5%) had periampullary diverticula and in 21 the papilla was located deep within the diverticulum of whom 227 had undergone endoscopic sphincterotomy (73.7%). Comparison was made with the 2150 patients without diverticula of whom 1223 (56.9%) had undergone sphincterotomy. The success rate of specific duct cannulation was 94.2% in the diverticulum group and 96.7% in those without diverticula (p less than 0.05). The overall success rate of endoscopic sphincterotomy was 95.2% in the diverticulum group, as compared with 98.0% in those without diverticula (p less than 0.05). The procedure related morbidity and mortality of sphincterotomy were 5.2%/0.9% and 4.0%/0.7% respectively (NS). If only those who had successful cholangiography were included there was no difference in sphincterotomy success between those with and without diverticula. The group of patients with papilla deep within diverticula had a slightly higher failure rate of pure endoscopic sphincterotomy (11.8% v 5.7%: NS) but did not have a higher complication rate. In the subgroup of patients with choledocholithiasis, duct clearance of stones was as successful after sphincterotomy in those with diverticula as in those without. Medium term complications (mean 26 months) occurred in 1.4% of patients with diverticula and in 0.7% of patients without diverticula. We conclude that diagnostic cholangiography is more difficult when the papilla is closely associated with a diverticulum but that if diagnostic cholangiography is obtained, sphincterotomy may be performed as successfully and as safely in those with or without diverticula.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2503431      PMCID: PMC1434299          DOI: 10.1136/gut.30.7.939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  5 in total

1.  Do juxtapapillary diverticula of the duodenum interfere with cannulation at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? A prospective study.

Authors:  C S Chang-Chien
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Endoscopic management of bile duct stones; (apples and oranges).

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Pseudostone at ERCP due to juxtapapillary diverticulum.

Authors:  D J Lintott; W S Ruddell; A T Axon
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Incidence and significance of juxtapapillary diverticula at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  A P Kirk; J A Summerfield
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Endoscopic biliary therapy using the combined percutaneous and endoscopic technique.

Authors:  J F Dowsett; D Vaira; A R Hatfield; S R Cairns; A Polydorou; R Frost; J Croker; P B Cotton; R C Russell; R R Mason
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 22.682

  5 in total
  19 in total

1.  Quality control: an application of the cusum.

Authors:  S M Williams; B R Parry; M M Schlup
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-23

2.  Periampullary diverticula: consequences of failed ERCP.

Authors:  D N Lobo; T W Balfour; S Y Iftikhar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  The clinical importance of different localizations of the papilla associated with juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula.

Authors:  Bunyami Ozogul; Gurkan Ozturk; Abdullah Kisaoglu; Bulent Aydinli; Mehmet Yildirgan; Sabri Selcuk Atamanalp
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Periampullary diverticulum may be an important factor for the occurrence and recurrence of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Xun Li; Kexiang Zhu; Lei Zhang; Wenbo Meng; Wence Zhou; Xiangliang Zhu; Bo Li
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Surgical treatments for patients with recurrent bile duct stones and Oddis sphincter laxity.

Authors:  Boxuan Zhou; Jinxiong Hu; Yuesi Zhong
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2017-08

6.  Limited endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilation for choledocholithiasis with periampullary diverticula.

Authors:  Hyung Wook Kim; Dae Hwan Kang; Cheol Woong Choi; Jong Hwan Park; Jin Ho Lee; Min Dae Kim; Il Doo Kim; Ki Tae Yoon; Mong Cho; Ung Bae Jeon; Suk Kim; Chang Won Kim; Jun Woo Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Does periampullary diverticulum affect ERCP cannulation and post-procedure complications? an up-to-date meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peilei Mu; Ping Yue; Fangwei Li; Yanyan Lin; Ying Liu; Wenbo Meng; Wence Zhou; Xun Li
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Endoscopic papillectomy: a novel approach to difficult cannulation.

Authors:  R J Farrell; M I Khan; N Noonan; K O'Byrne; P W Keeling
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Additional biliary cannulation methods in patients with juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula.

Authors:  Erkan Parlak; Aydın Seref Köksal; Selçuk Dişibeyaz; Bahattin Ciçek; Serkan Uysal; Nurgül Saşmaz; Burhan Sahin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Case review of impacted bile duct stone at duodenal papilla: detection and endoscopic treatment.

Authors:  Kwang Ro Joo; Jae Myung Cha; Sung Won Jung; Hyun Phil Shin; Joung Il Lee; Yu Jin Suh; Sunhyung Joo; Sung-Jo Bang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.