Literature DB >> 25033794

Accuracy of point-of-care serum creatinine devices for detecting patients at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy: a critical overview.

Felipe Martínez Lomakin1, Catalina Tobar.   

Abstract

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common event in hospitals, with reported incidences ranging from 1 to 30%. Patients with underlying kidney disease have an increased risk of developing CIN. Point-of-care (POC) creatinine devices are handheld devices capable of providing quantitative data on a patient's kidney function that could be useful in stratifying preventive measures. This overview aims to synthesize the current evidence on diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of POC creatinine devices in detecting patients at risk of CIN. Five databases were searched for diagnostic accuracy studies or clinical trials that evaluated the usefulness of POC devices in detecting patients at risk of CIN. Selected articles were critically appraised to assess their individual risk of bias by the use of standard criteria; 13 studies were found that addressed the diagnostic accuracy or clinical utility of POC creatinine devices. Most studies incurred a moderate to high risk of bias. Overall concordance between POC devices and reference standards (clinical laboratory procedures) was found to be moderate, with 95% limits of agreement often lying between -35.4 and +35.4 µmol/L (-0.4 and +0.4 mg/dL). Concordance was shown to decrease with worsening kidney function. Data on the clinical utility of these devices were limited, but a significant reduction in time to diagnosis was reported in two studies. Overall, POC creatinine devices showed a moderate concordance with standard clinical laboratory creatinine measurements. Several biases could have induced optimism in these estimations. Results obtained from these devices may be unreliable in cases of severe kidney failure. Randomized trials are needed to address the clinical utility of these devices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast-induced nephropathy; creatinine; point-of-care; risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25033794     DOI: 10.3109/10408363.2014.937794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci        ISSN: 1040-8363            Impact factor:   6.250


  8 in total

1.  Is point of care renal function testing reliable screening pre-IV contrast administration?

Authors:  Namit Mathur; Zhong X Lu; Lisa MacKay; Theodore Lau; Ahilan Kuganesan; Kenneth K Lau
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2020-07-29

2.  Academic College of Emergency Experts in India's INDO-US Joint Working Group and OPUS12 Foundation Consensus Statement on Creating A Coordinated, Multi-Disciplinary, Patient-Centered, Global Point-of-Care Biomarker Discovery Network.

Authors:  Stanislaw P Stawicki; Jill C Stoltzfus; Praveen Aggarwal; Sanjeev Bhoi; Shashi Bhatt; O P Kalra; Ashish Bhalla; Brian A Hoey; Sagar C Galwankar; Lorenzo Paladino; Thomas J Papadimos
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-07

3.  Assessing the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Using a Finger Stick Analysis in Recalls from Breast Screening: The CINFIBS Explorative Study.

Authors:  I P L Houben; C J L Y van Berlo; O Bekers; E C Nijssen; M B I Lobbes; J E Wildberger
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 4.  Post-contrast acute kidney injury - Part 1: Definition, clinical features, incidence, role of contrast medium and risk factors : Recommendations for updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines.

Authors:  Aart J van der Molen; Peter Reimer; Ilona A Dekkers; Georg Bongartz; Marie-France Bellin; Michele Bertolotto; Olivier Clement; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Fulvio Stacul; Judith A W Webb; Henrik S Thomsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Unadjusted point of care creatinine results overestimate acute kidney injury incidence during field testing in Guatemala.

Authors:  Benjamin R Griffin; Jaime Butler-Dawson; Miranda Dally; Lyndsay Krisher; Alex Cruz; David Weitzenkamp; Cecilia Sorensen; Liliana Tenney; Richard J Johnson; Lee S Newman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Pilot study determining the feasibility of implementing the Disadvantaged Populations eGFR Epidemiology Study (DEGREE) protocol, point-of-care field measurements and a new module on risk factors for chronic kidney disease of unknown origin in Hispanic outdoor workers.

Authors:  Erika Figueroa-Solis; David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras; George L Delclos
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Performance evaluation of all analytes on the epoc® Blood Analysis System for use in hospital surgical and intensive care units.

Authors:  Zahraa Mohammed-Ali; Sousan Bagherpoor; Pauline Diker; Thuy Hoang; Ivana Vidovic; Christine Cursio; Felix Leung; Davor Brinc
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2020-11-25

8.  Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury After Computed Tomography Angiography±Computed Tomography Perfusion Followed by Thrombectomy in Patients With Stroke Using a Postprocedural Hydration Protocol.

Authors:  Ralph Weber; Robert van Hal; Paul Stracke; Jeffrie Hadisurya; Hannes Nordmeyer; René Chapot
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 5.501

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.