Literature DB >> 25033757

How many testers are needed to assure the usability of medical devices?

Simone Borsci1, Robert D Macredie, Jennifer L Martin, Terry Young.   

Abstract

Before releasing a product, manufacturers have to follow a regulatory framework and meet standards, producing reliable evidence that the device presents low levels of risk in use. There is, though, a gap between the needs of the manufacturers to conduct usability testing while managing their costs, and the requirements of authorities for representative evaluation data. A key issue here is the number of users that should complete this evaluation to provide confidence in a product's safety. This paper reviews the US FDA's indication that a sample composed of 15 participants per major group (or a minimum of 25 users) should be enough to identify 90-97% of the usability problems and argues that a more nuanced approach to determining sample size (which would also fit well with the FDA's own concerns) would be beneficial. The paper will show that there is no a priori cohort size that can guarantee a reliable assessment, a point stressed by the FDA in the appendices to its guidance, but that manufacturers can terminate the assessment when appropriate by using a specific approach - illustrated in this paper through a case study - called the 'Grounded Procedure'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evaluation cohort; five-user assumption; medical devices; product safety; usability testing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25033757     DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2014.940312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  6 in total

1.  Using Patient Feedback to Optimize the Design of a Certolizumab Pegol Electromechanical Self-Injection Device: Insights from Human Factors Studies.

Authors:  Barbara Domańska; Oliver Stumpp; Steven Poon; Serkan Oray; Irina Mountian; Clovis Pichon
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Biofeedback in Partial Weight Bearing: Usability of Two Different Devices from a Patient's and Physical Therapist's Perspective.

Authors:  Remko van Lieshout; Martijn F Pisters; Benedicte Vanwanseele; Rob A de Bie; Eveline J Wouters; Mirelle J Stukstette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period.

Authors:  Konstantina Vasileiou; Julie Barnett; Susan Thorpe; Terry Young
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Estimating the number of usability problems affecting medical devices: modelling the discovery matrix.

Authors:  Vincent Vandewalle; Alexandre Caron; Coralie Delettrez; Renaud Périchon; Sylvia Pelayo; Alain Duhamel; Benoit Dervaux
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Usability Assessment of an Innovative Device in Infusion Therapy: A Mix-Method Approach Study.

Authors:  Pedro Parreira; Liliana B Sousa; Inês A Marques; Paulo Santos-Costa; Sara Cortez; Filipa Carneiro; Arménio Cruz; Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Design and Development of a Virtual Reality-Based Mobility Training Game for People With Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  James M Finley; Marientina Gotsis; Vangelis Lympouridis; Shreya Jain; Aram Kim; Beth E Fisher
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.