Literature DB >> 25033220

Body cell mass evaluation in critically ill patients: killing two birds with one stone.

Enrico Fiaccadori, Santo Morabito, Aderville Cabassi, Giuseppe Regolisti.   

Abstract

Body cell mass (BCM) is the metabolically active cell mass involved in O₂ consumption, CO₂ production and energy expenditure. BCM measurement has been suggested as a tool for the evaluation of nutritional status. Since BCM is closely related to energy expenditure, it could also represent a good reference value for the calculation of nutrient needs. In a recent issue of Critical Care, Ismael and colleagues used bioelectrical impedance analysis parameters and anthropometric variables to evaluate BCM in patients with acute kidney injury, before and after a hemodialysis session. The results of this study suggest that BCM is relatively insensitive to major body fluid shifts, a well known factor interfering with nutritional evaluation/monitoring and energy need calculations in the ICU. Thus, BCM seems to be a more 'stable' nutritional variable, as it is apparently less influenced by non-nutritional factors. The results of this paper emphasize the need to identify biologically sound parameters for nutritional status evaluation and energy need calculation in critically ill patients; in this regard, BCM could fulfill these expectations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25033220      PMCID: PMC4056187          DOI: 10.1186/cc13852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


In a recent issue of Critical Care, Ismael and colleagues [1] reported the results of a study on 31 hemodynamically stable patients with acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis and able to tolerate ultrafiltration rates of ≥5% body weight per session (mean weight loss of 3.8 kg). They derived intra- and extracellular water volumes from low- and high-frequency resistances measured by multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) of body compartments, before and after hemodialysis. Moreover, they estimated body cell mass (BCM) from BIA parameters and anthropometric variables, based on a recently developed regression equation specific for ICU patients [2]. The investigation aimed at evaluating the consistency and clinical relevance of the current model for BCM calculation in case of massive changes in the external fluid balance. The results of this promising study suggest that estimated BCM is relatively insensitive to major body fluid shifts, a frequent problem among critically ill patients, and also a well known factor interfering with nutritional evaluation and monitoring in this clinical setting. Thus, BCM seems to be a more 'stable' nutritional variable, as it appears less influenced by non-nutritional factors. Many factors may significantly interfere with the measurement and interpretation of the classical nutritional variables in the ICU, especially when rapid changes of fluid balance and/or renal function derangements are present [3]. At the same time, the precise definition of energy needs, when the gold standard of indirect calorimetry is not available, still relies on estimations obtained from predictive formulas or on calculations using a fixed amount of calories per kilogram of body weight [4], with the latter being not always measured, and often heavily affected by rapid modifications of fluid balance. Critically ill patients may have wide variations in energy requirements [4,5], thus being at high risk for both underfeeding and overfeeding. Therefore, the issue of administering the right amount of calories at the right time to these patients has gained major attention [6,7]. Indeed, recent data suggest that individual tailoring of calorie supplementation in terms of both timing [8] and intake [9,10] could impact significantly on the effects of nutritional support on patients’ prognosis. BCM is the metabolically active component of fat-free mass, and represents the cell mass actually involved in O2 consumption, CO2 production and energy expenditure [11]. It is negatively affected in the course of critical illness, and its measurement has been suggested as a tool for the evaluation of nutritional status in these patients [11,12]. Moreover, since it is closely related to energy expenditure, BCM could also represent a good reference value for the calculation of nutrient needs. BCM can be directly measured by isotope dilution methods (that is, 40 K), or estimated by predictive equations [2]. However, the gold standard methods based on radioactive tracer techniques are not amenable to routine use in the ICU. On the other hand, bedside estimation of BCM, essentially using equations based on BIA of body compartments, could represent a simple, non-invasive and repeatable tool for nutritional status evaluation in critically ill patients. The results of the paper by Ismael and associates [1] emphasize the need to identify biologically sound parameters for nutritional status evaluation and energy need calculation in critically ill patients; in this regard, BCM could fulfill these expectations. Encouraging results have been obtained recently in other clinical settings when interventions were tailored based on BIA of body composition [13]. A number of open issues remain, however, and the overall impression is that more data should be collected before this promising approach can be applied routinely in ICU patients. Undoubtedly, by choosing short hemodialysis sessions, the authors exploited a simple clinical model of rapid fluid balance changes. However, the need to use high net ultrafiltration rates inevitably selects a relatively more healthy population of hemodynamically stable ICU patients. Moreover, a recent study that investigated the intrinsic error of the BIA methods for estimating body fluid volume/composition in chronic dialysis patients demonstrated that such estimates can be consistent at a population level, but not always at the individual level due to wide limits of agreement [14]. Within this conceptual framework, it has been also correctly observed that the prediction error of methods based on BIA of body compartments is the sum of many errors, namely the impedance measurement error, the regression error, the intrinsic error of the reference method, the electric volume model error, and the biological variability among subjects [15].

Conclusion

In the selected population of ICU patients of their study, the authors’ approach seems to be physiologically sound and effective. Thus, although their results cannot be immediately translated to the complex and dynamically changing clinical setting of the ICU, they are surely encouraging and should prompt further investigations on this innovative approach that could possibly kill two birds with one stone.

Abbreviations

BCM: Body cell mass; BIA: Bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  15 in total

1.  Assessment of body cell mass at bedside in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Magali Savalle; Florence Gillaizeau; Gérard Maruani; Etienne Puymirat; Florence Bellenfant; Pascal Houillier; Jean-Yves Fagon; Christophe Faisy
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.310

2.  The tight calorie control study (TICACOS): a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study of nutritional support in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Pierre Singer; Ronit Anbar; Jonathan Cohen; Haim Shapiro; Michal Shalita-Chesner; Shaul Lev; Elad Grozovski; Miryam Theilla; Sigal Frishman; Zecharia Madar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Michael P Casaer; Dieter Mesotten; Greet Hermans; Pieter J Wouters; Miet Schetz; Geert Meyfroidt; Sophie Van Cromphaut; Catherine Ingels; Philippe Meersseman; Jan Muller; Dirk Vlasselaers; Yves Debaveye; Lars Desmet; Jasperina Dubois; Aime Van Assche; Simon Vanderheyden; Alexander Wilmer; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Evaluation of three indirect calorimetry devices in mechanically ventilated patients: which device compares best with the Deltatrac II(®)? A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Séverine Graf; Véronique Laurie Karsegard; Valérie Viatte; Claudia Paula Heidegger; Yvan Fleury; Claude Pichard; Laurence Genton
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  Bioelectrical impedance plethysmographic analysis of body composition in critically injured and healthy subjects.

Authors:  D C Frankenfield; R N Cooney; J S Smith; W A Rowe
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 6.  Specialized nutritional support interventions in critically ill patients on renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Enrico Fiaccadori; Giuseppe Regolisti; Umberto Maggiore
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.294

7.  The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass.

Authors:  A M Roza; H M Shizgal
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  The truth about nutrition in the ICU.

Authors:  P Singer; G S Doig; C Pichard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  When more is better.

Authors:  Claude Pichard
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  The consequences of sudden fluid shifts on body composition in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Sophie Ismael; Magali Savalle; Claire Trivin; Florence Gillaizeau; Christian D'Auzac; Christophe Faisy
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  2 in total

1.  Resting metabolic rate and its adjustments as predictors of risk protein-energy wasting in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Jingjing Da; Yanjun Long; Qian Li; Xia Yang; Jing Yuan; Yan Zha
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Resting Energy Expenditure during Breastfeeding: Body Composition Analysis vs. Predictive Equations Based on Anthropometric Parameters.

Authors:  Agnieszka Bzikowska-Jura; Adriana Szulińska; Dorota Szostak-Węgierek
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 5.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.