| Literature DB >> 25032691 |
Emilie M M Santos1, Henk A Marquering2, Olvert A Berkhemer3, Wim H van Zwam4, Aad van der Lugt5, Charles B Majoie3, Wiro J Niessen6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25032691 PMCID: PMC4102487 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Illustration of the pipeline of the automated method.
(A) The segmentation of the contralateral vasculature is started after manual seeds point placement. The lumen is segmented using a graph cut segmentation.(B) The thrombus is detected by mirroring the centerline and a Bspline registration followed by the segmentation of the occluded segment. Distal and proximal thrombus position is detected using the lumen radii.(C) Thrombus is segmented using tubular masking and region growing.
Image segmentation parameters and their corresponding values.
| Parameters | Values (unit) |
| Vesselness filter (σlow, σup) | 1.0, 3.5 |
| Graph cut (σinside, σoutside) | 20, 20 (Hounsfield unit) |
| Radial Reg. (fractionoutside, Poutside, blurσdistance) | 0.75, 0.5, 2 (mm) |
| Weighed Gaussian Reg. (Iteration, σradius) | 2, 0.5 (mm) |
| 3D-BSpline registration (Grid spacing, grey level) | 2 (mm), 32 (bit) |
| Mathematical morphology (opening, dilatation (3D kernel (2n+1))) | n = 1(voxel), n = 1(voxel) |
Figure 2Illustration of the manual segmentation process.
A centerline is drawn in orthogonal views and subsequently corrected using MPR viewing. The contours of the thrombus are drawn first in a longitudinal view and subsequently corrected using on a transversal view.
Figure 3Scatter plot of thrombus length and volume of observer 1 and automated method (A, B).
Scatter plot of thrombus length and volume of observer1 and observer 2 and 3 (C, D). The solid line represents the identity line.
Comparison of volume and length measurements for the automated method and observers.
| Average ± SD | (min, max) | N | Average paired difference ± SD | Limits of agreement, upper/lower limit | ICC | |
| Length (mm) | ||||||
| Observer 1 | 15.1±9.0 | (2.0, 43.8) | 53 | −0.4±4.3 | −8.8/7.7 | 0.89 |
| Automated | 15.4±9.3 | (2.7, 42.8) | ||||
| Observer 1 | 15.9±9.0 | (3.0, 36.9) | 20 | −0.1±5.7 | −11.2/10.9 | 0.90 |
| Observer 2 | 16.1±9.8 | (2.0, 36.9) | ||||
| Observer 1 | 17.1±10.0 | (6.0, 43.8) | 20 | −5.0±15.1 | −34.7/24.6 | 0.31 |
| Observer 3 | 22.1±13.9 | (4.0, 57.9) | ||||
| Volume (mm3) | ||||||
| Observer 1 | 152±125 | (12, 542) | 53 | 7.5±67 | −126/141 | 0.84 |
| Automated | 145±110 | (11, 406) | ||||
| 1Observer 1 | 137±122 | (13, 460) | 20 | −17±103 | −218/185 | 0.85 |
| Observer 2 | 154±163 | (12, 656) | ||||
| Observer 1 | 205±127 | (15, 542) | 20 | −25±127 | −340/224 | 0.61 |
| Observer 3 | 230±157 | (68, 644) |
*p-value <0.001
p-value <0.005.
Figure 4Bland-Altman plot comparing thrombus volume and length as measured by observer 1 and the automated method (A, B), and for all observers (D, C).