Literature DB >> 25031652

Adipogenic transcriptome profiling using high throughput technologies.

Urmila Basu1, Josue Moura Romao1, Le Luo Guan1.   

Abstract

The recent technological innovations in the area of functional genomics, gene expression/transcriptomic profiling can provide new insights to understand the molecular basis of adipogenesis. The focus of this review is to highlight the recent advances in our understanding of the complex interplay of gene expression events and the regulatory mechanisms of adipogenesis in mouse cell lines, humans and farm animals. All these studies have employed the availability of constantly evolving high throughput 'omics' technologies including microarrays, RNA-Seq, chromatin immunoprecipitation, next generation sequencing, RNAi, miRNA profiling and quantitative PCR arrays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adipogenesis; functional genomics; gene expression; transcriptome

Year:  2013        PMID: 25031652      PMCID: PMC4091434          DOI: 10.7150/jgen.3781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genomics


Introduction

Adipogenesis is the process by which immature adipose cells differentiate into specialized mature cells, such as adipocytes, being able to synthesize and store fatty acids in the form of triglycerides as well as to release free fatty acids, playing an important role in the energy regulation 1. Not only the adipose cells store and release fatty acids, but they also release a series of adipokines that have various regulatory functions on energy metabolism, such as leptin, that inhibits the food intake and stimulate energy expenditure 2. Another aspect that has gathered the attention of researchers to adipose tissue is the significant increase of obesity in humans which is a critical risk for human health, especially in developed countries 2. Obesity is now a major concern for not only humans but also for companion animals' health, such as dogs and cats which are more and more affected by this condition 3. Besides health aspects, the adipose tissue has also been studied in the farm animals, especially those specialized in meat production such as: beef cattle, pigs and broilers. The reason is that adipose tissue is an important characteristic related to meat quality and nutritional value of the meat and can also impact animal productivity 4, 5. However, our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms on adipogenesis in mammalian species is currently very limited. Studies in the past decades on the molecular mechanism of adipogenesis have revealed the important role that this tissue plays in the regulation of fat and energy metabolism 6. Recent studies have also indicated the importance of adipogenic transcription factors such as Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor γ (PPARγ), CCAAT-Enhancer Binding Proteins (C/EBPs), Kruppel Like Factors (KLFs) and Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein (SREBP), in regulating the expression of many adipogenic genes leading to the differentiation of adipocytes 7, 8. Besides the transcriptional factor regulated mechanisms, many other genes have been also reported to be differentially expressed during adipogenesis, suggesting that the adipogenesis is a complex process associated with many regulatory mechanisms. In this paper, we have focused on elucidation of molecular mechanisms of adipogenesis by studying the transcriptome (mRNAs and miRNAs) using advanced high throughput technologies. Recently, high-throughput technologies have become essential tools for large scale studies for identification of the molecular networks associated with adipogenesis. These include microarrays or RNA-Seq for gene expression profiling, chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by microarray analysis (ChIP-chip), or next generation sequencing (ChIP-Seq) for comprehensive analysis of target genes of transcription factors, RNAi screening in conjunction with microarray, DNase I hypersensitivity analysis, and adipogenesis quantitative PCR array 9-11.

Microarrays/Quantitative real time PCR/Adipogenesis real time PCR array

DNA microarrays comprising hundreds or thousands of DNA fragments arrayed on small glass slides which can be used to probe the entire transcriptome to give an overall picture of gene expression behavior 12. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) combines the amplification of a DNA sequence with the detection of the amplified products during each reaction cycle and is a commonly used validation tool for confirming gene expression results obtained from microarray analysis 13. Microarray technology has been used in several gene expression profiling studies (see Table 1 for some examples) in cell culture models from mouse pre-adipocyte cell line 3T3-L1 14-18, human mesenchymal stem cells or subcutaneous abdominal fat sample 19-23, bovine 24-27, pig 28-30 as well as other organisms 31 to monitor transcriptional changes associated with adipogenesis. Different array technologies including commercially available Genome Arrays (Affymetrix), custom spotted oligonucleotide or cDNA arrays 10 have been employed in conjunction with qRT-PCR for most of these studies to identify molecular changes at different stages of adipogenesis in response to different treatments for differentiation 10, 17, 32, 33.
Table 1

List of major adipogenic candidates identified in mouse cell line, human, bovine and porcine by gene expression profiling using microarray.

OrganismMicroarray usedMajor candidate genesReference
Mouse cell line (3T3-L1)Mouse genome array (Affymetrix)Liver X receptor α (LXRα)Ross et al., 2002 14
Mouse genome array (Affymetrix)Transcriptional enhancer and activator domain (TEAD); Latexin gene; Thymus Inhibitor of Apoptosis (TIAP)Tolloid-like mRNA (mTld)Disintegrin and metalloprotease domain-8 (ADAM 8); Myelin basic protein expression factor 2 (MYEF 2)Burton et al., 2004 15
Mouse genome array (Affymetrix)Integrins α5 and α6Liu et al., 200516
38K Mouse Exonic Evidence-based Oligonucleotide (MEEBO) microarrayCCAAT-enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBPs)Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor ƴ (PPARγ)Pantoja et al., 2005 17
Affymetrix mouse array and RNA interference (RNAi)Receptor interacting protein 140 (RIP140);Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP4k4); Fat specific protein 27 (FSP27)Puri et al., 200838
Affymetrix mouse arraySIRT1-related transcriptional signature;A transcription factor (TCF21)Timmons et al., 2007 32
Mouse embryonic stem cellsAffymetrix mouse array500 differentially expressed (DE) genes - PPARγ; Fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4); Forkhead boc C2 (FOXC2); CCAAT enhancer-binding proteinBillon et al., 2010 37
HumancDNA microarray (3400 genes)197 DE genesNakamura et al., 2003 19
microarray113 DE genes- PPARγ2, lipoprotein lipase (LPL), and fatty acid binding protein (FAP2)Hung et al., 2004 20
microarray67 DE genes - PPARγ; CCAAT enhancer-binding protein alpha; acylCoA synthetase, lipoprotein lipase (LPL); FABP4Sekiya et al., 2004 21
microarray1606 DE genes- Liver x-receptor (LXRα); COUP transcription factor 1 (COUP-TF1); phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP), and the transmembrane protein (TMEM135)Scheideler et al., 2008 22
cDNA microarrayCCAAT enhancer-binding protein alpha; PPARγ; Angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4)Rodriguez-Acebes et al., 2010 23
CattleBovine genome microarray158 DE genes- FABP4Tan et al., 200624
Bovine genome microarray100 DE genes- PPARγ; sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP-1)Taniguchi et al., 2008a, 2008b 25, 26
Bovine genome microarrayDisintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 4 (ADAMTS4)Lee et al., 2010 27
PigcDNA microarray with 3500 genes81 DE genes- FABP (aP2), stearyl-CoA desaturase (SCD), sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1 (SREBF1) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL)Guo et al., 2008 28
Porcine Genome Array (Affymetrix)5066 DE genes - Fatty acid synthase (FASN); LPL; 3-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/delta-5-delta-4 isomerase (HSD3B1); angiopoietin-like-4 (ANGPTL4); uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3)Barb et al., 2010 29
A large number of genes identified by these microarray studies, using different cell models or organisms, are found to be associated with adipocyte differentiation which is driven by a network of transcriptional regulators 10, 34. Some of these examples include members of Kruppel-like factor (Klf4) family, Klf6 and Klf5, which are required for adipogenesis by transactivating PPARγ 35; and zinc finger containing transcription factor Egr2 (Krox2), which stimulates adipogenesis through activating C/EBP-β by binding to its promoter 36. Besides these, genes encoding a number of enzymes including xanthine dehydrogenase (Xdh, XOR), stearoyl-CoA desaturase (Scd1), adipose triglyceride lipase Pnpla2 (ATGL) have also been identified through these microarray studies 34. Genome wide microarray analysis in Hanwoo (Korean cattle) identified a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 4 as one of the key genes controlling the relationship between marbling fat deposition and connective tissue degradation 27. Several transcription factors and motifs with no previous link to adipocyte biology were identified using genome-wide analysis of gene expression during adipogenesis of mouse embryonic stem cells. This study utilized Mouse Genome array (Affymetrix), qRT-PCR and in silico prediction analysis of transcription factor binding sites with comprehensive bioinformatics analysis 37. Puri et al. 38 identified the role of Receptor interacting protein 140 and Mitogen-activated protein kinase as powerful regulators of adipogenesis by performing Mouse Genome array (Affymetrix) comparative gene expression profiling of siRNA knock out cultured 3T3-L1 adipocytes cells vs. control. However, inconsistencies have been observed in some of these microarray studies due to the usage of different platforms and protocols, probe sequences or their annotations. Recently available, “Adipogenesis Pathways™ Focused Human Genome Microarrays” (ArrayIt Corporation) which contain long-mer capture agents for 89 genes involved in the human adipogenesis pathway, would provide a solution to overcome these inconsistencies in the human adipogenesis studies. Furthermore, the mouse adipogenesis RT Profiler PCR array (QIAGEN) can also be utilized to analyze the gene expression of a focused panel of 84 key genes involved in adipogenesis, with real time PCR sensitivity and the multi-gene profiling capability of a microarray.

Next generation sequencing/Chromatin immunopreciptation (ChIP)-chip / ChIp-Seq

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, which are able to simultaneously sequence several thousand DNA fragments, including whole-transcriptome sequencing using RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) or digital gene expression (DGE) profiling, have started to reveal the complexities of different biological processes at an unprecedented level of sensitivity and accuracy 39-41. Table 2 lists examples of the adipogenesis studies conducted in different organisms using high throughput technologies. Differential gene expression during adipogenesis in a clonal bovine intramuscular preadipocyte cell line using serial analysis of gene expression identified 878 differentially expressed genes 42. Digital gene expression-tag profiling was performed to generate transcriptome profiles of backfat tissues from beef steers to elucidate the molecular mechanism of fat deposition in adipose tissues 43. In this study 43, a total of 18,034 genes were identified and 650 genes were found to be differentially expressed including Retinoblastoma 1, PPARα, Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 5, ATP citrate lyase, Leptin, phosphate cytidylyltransferase 2 ethanolamine, Interleukin 18, and Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade E, member 1. Recently, Chen et al. 44 used high throughput RNA-Seq to generate a high-resolution map of the porcine mRNA and miRNA transcriptome in liver, muscle and fat from a full-sib F2 female pair with extreme phenotypes. This study provided not only provided a global view of the pig transcriptome but also revealed new information about the large scale alternative splicing events and identified gene boundaries at single nucleotide resolution. A high degree of transcriptional complexity in the regulatory mechanisms of adipogenesis in porcine adipose tissue was revealed by the identification of 1596 differentially expressed genes 45.
Table 2

High throughput technologies to identify candidate adipogenic genes, transcription factors (TFs), and chromatin region in mouse cell line, human, bovine and porcine

OrganismTechnology usedCandidate genes / TFs / chromatin regionsReference
Mouse cell line (3T3-L1)ChIP-chipTransmembrane protein 143 (TMEM143);Haptoglobin (HP); Fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4); Adipsin (CFD)Nakachi et al., 2008 9
ChIP/whole genome tilling arrays5299 genomic regions of PPARγ bindingLefterova et al., 2008 48
ChIP-SeqGenome wide map of >5000 PPARγ and retinoid X receptor (RXR)-binding sitesNielsen et al., 2008 50
ChIP-PET (ChiP pair end-tagging technology)7700 DNA binding sites of PPARγ and RXRHamza et al., 2009 51
ChIP-chip and ChIP-SeqHistone H4 Lys 20 (H4K20) - transcriptional regulation and epigenetic chromatin modulationWakabayashi et al., 2009 53
ChIP-SeqCo-localization of PPARγ with the hematopoietic transcription factor PU.1 in areas of open chromatin and histone acetylationLefterova et al., 2010 54
Illumina's Mouse Ref-8 Expression BeadChipsETS (E-twenty six) family transcription factorBirsoy et al., 2011 18
Genome-wide mapping of DNase-hypersensitive regions using DHS-SeqMultiple transcription factor 'hotspots' PPARγ; C/EBPα; glucocorticoid receptor, retinoid X receptorSiersbaek et al., 2011 59
HumanChIP-Seq in mature human SGBS adipocytes52,733 C/EBPα and 23,328 PPARγ binding sitesSchmidt et al., 2011 56
ChIP-SeqHistone H3 on Lysine 56 (H3K56) acetylation, E2F4 recognition, C/EBPα and HSF-1 bindingLo et al., 2011 58
CattleSerial analysis of gene expression (SAGE)878 DE genes - Collagen Type 1 (COL18A1); Glutathione peroxidase (GPX3); Serum amyloid A3 (SAA3); Fibronectin 1 (FN1); Adipose differentiation-related protein (ADFP)Mizoguchi et al., 2010 42
3' digital gene expression tag profiling650 DE genes - Retinoblastoma 1(RB1); PPARα; Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 5 (SCD5); ATP citrate lyase (ACLY); Leptin (LEP); phosphate cytidylyltransferase 2 ethanolamine (PCYT2); Interleukin 18 (IL18); Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade E, member 1(SERPINE1)Jin et al., 2012 43
Pig3' digital gene expression tag profiling1596 DE genes (with 887 up-regulated and 709 down-regulated)Li et al., 2011 45
RNA-Seq and Genome-wide association studiesInsulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2)Chen et al., 2011 44
Chromatin immunopreciptation (ChIP) is widely used for identifying and characterizing elements like histones, transcriptional factors, in protein-DNA interactions involved in the gene regulation or chromatin organization 46. ChIP-chip (chromatin immunoprecipitation-on-chip) involves incubation of the genomic DNA in the presence of proteins, shearing of DNA into small pieces followed by the immunoprecipitation of DNA-bound proteins with an antibody. Subsequently, DNA is purified, labeled and hybridized to microarray which allows identification of significantly enriched sequences bound by the proteins of interest 47. Most of the changes occurring during adipogenesis are thought to be controlled or mediated by particular transcription factors and ChIP-chip is able to produce comprehensive genome-wide location information for specific transcription factors. Several target genes of PPARγ were identified using integrated analyses of ChIP-chip, expression microarray and computational motif search 9. Other studies have characterized PPARγ and C/EBPα-binding sites in mature 3T3-L1 adipocytes using ChIP-chip 48. Although microarray platforms provide a method for 'global' ChIP analysis, a novel approach combining Chip assay with next generation parallel sequencing (ChIP-Seq) has allowed researchers to study genome-wide protein DNA interactions in an unbiased manner 47, 49. These genome-wide studies employing ChIP-Seq have improved our understanding of the transcriptional networks controlling adipogenesis at different stages of differentiation 50-52. Further studies have also identified the molecular signatures of PPARγ binding using ChIP-Seq 53-56. Transcription factor 7-like 1 (TCF7L1) was found to repress a large number of cytostructural genes before adipocyte gene induction using ChIP-Seq 57. The first genome-wide profile of H3K56 (lysine 56 of histone H3) acetylation, and binding location analysis of E2F4, C/EBPα and HSF-1 binding in human adipocytes derived from mesenchymal stem cells found that almost half of the genome shows signs of H3K56 acetylation. This acetylation is associated with transcription factors and proteins in the adipokine signaling, and will serve as an important resource to further understanding of adipocyte transcriptional regulation and epigenetic modifications 58. Recent studies used DNase I Hypersensitive (DHS) site analysis in combination with deep sequencing, to detect dynamic changes of the chromatin landscape during adipocyte differentiation, coinciding with cooperative binding of multiple transcription factors to transcription factor hotspots 59, 60. In DHS site analysis, nuclear or whole-cell extracts containing proteins of interest are allowed to bind to DNA segments followed by the treatment of the resulting complexes with DNase I. Deep sequencing of the DNA released from DHS sites helps in the identification of regulatory elements for a given locus and to characterize chromatin structures 61. The time-resolved expression profiling of all nuclear receptor superfamily members, using the chromatin-region specific primers by qRT-PCR of ChIP templates revealed that glucocorticoid receptor and its ligand cortisol as central regulatory factors controlling early regulatory events in human adipogenesis 62. The combination of ChIP for enrichment of both coding and unexplored regulatory regions of transcriptional factors, coupled to the targeted re-sequencing or transcriptome analysis using RNA-Seq on next generation sequencing platforms, will provide further insights into the genomic architecture of its regulatory regions and the associated changes in transcriptomes. RNAseq will further prove to be effective in identifying transcriptomes under multiple conditions of adipogenesis and their response to various environmental factors.

MicroRNA profiling

MicroRNAs are non-coding small RNAs with approximately 22 nucleotides that participate in several biological processes, such as development, cell differentiation, apoptosis, metabolism and pathogenesis through the gene expression regulation mainly by mRNA translation repression 63-65. Several microRNAs are reported to play a role in the physiology and pathology of adipose tissue of mammals 66, 67. Therefore, there is a great interest to characterize the microRNA expression profile in fat tissues of humans as well as farm animals in order to understand how microRNAs participate in the regulation of adipose tissue development. Recent studies reported the miRNA profiles in adipose tissue of meat farm animal, such as beef cattle 68, 69 and pigs 70. Adipose tissue (subcutaneous fat) from beef cattle showed different profiles of miRNAs according to the location in the fat depot, with 80, 66 and 63 miRNAs detected respectively in abdominal subcutaneous, back subcutaneous and rump subcutaneous tissues by qRT-PCR 68. Besides not only depot location, but also the fat traits of the animals (high backfat thickness vs. low backfat thickness) impacts miRNA profiles found by qRT-PCR analysis. A total of 42 miRNAs were differentially expressed between these groups, being miR-378 the most differentially expressed. Li et al. 71 profiled swine adipose tissue (backfat) using a Solexa deep sequencing approach which allowed the identification of the sequence and relative expression of 227 miRNAs. Their results also showed that the abundant miRNAs belonged mainly to 32 miRNA gene families, which included miR-143, miR-103, let-7, and miR-148. Comparing the conserved miRNAs between the profiles of 7day old and 240 day old pigs, the authors found a total of 93 miRNAs up-regulated and 33 down-regulated in adult animals, indicating the impact of animal development in miRNA profiles of adipose tissue. Deep sequencing analysis also provided a global view of the complexity of the miRNA transcriptome and in total 164 potential novel tissue-specific miRNAs were detected 44.

Future perspectives

Understanding the molecular basis of adipogenesis and fat cell development is essential to identify new biomarkers. Adipogenesis is a complex process that appears to be regulated in a coordinated manner by genes, proteins, microRNAs expression to modulate fat formation in mammalian species. Integrated analysis of transcriptome, proteome, microRNAome and genome wide association studies are necessary to achieve the comprehensive view of the regulatory mechanisms on adipogenesis. Furthermore, detailed information on epigenetic regulation will be extremely beneficial to complement these studies to improve our understanding of the complexities of adipogenesis.
  69 in total

1.  Krox20 stimulates adipogenesis via C/EBPbeta-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

Authors:  Zhu Chen; Javier I Torrens; Ashim Anand; Bruce M Spiegelman; Jeffrey M Friedman
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 2.  Metabolism of lipids in human white adipocyte.

Authors:  V Large; O Peroni; D Letexier; H Ray; M Beylot
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.041

3.  Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of mouse embryonic stem cell adipogenesis unravels new processes of adipocyte development.

Authors:  Nathalie Billon; Raivo Kolde; Jüri Reimand; Miguel C Monteiro; Meelis Kull; Hedi Peterson; Konstantin Tretyakov; Priit Adler; Brigitte Wdziekonski; Jaak Vilo; Christian Dani
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Time-resolved expression profiling of the nuclear receptor superfamily in human adipogenesis.

Authors:  Mari Lahnalampi; Merja Heinäniemi; Lasse Sinkkonen; Martin Wabitsch; Carsten Carlberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Adipogenesis of bovine perimuscular preadipocytes.

Authors:  Masaaki Taniguchi; Le Luo Guan; Bing Zhang; Michael V Dodson; Erasmus Okine; Stephen S Moore
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 6.  Targeting microRNAs in obesity.

Authors:  Huangming Xie; Lei Sun; Harvey F Lodish
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.902

Review 7.  RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics.

Authors:  Zhong Wang; Mark Gerstein; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  ChIP-chip versus ChIP-seq: lessons for experimental design and data analysis.

Authors:  Joshua W K Ho; Eric Bishop; Peter V Karchenko; Nicolas Nègre; Kevin P White; Peter J Park
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Microarray validation: factors influencing correlation between oligonucleotide microarrays and real-time PCR.

Authors:  Jeanine S Morey; James C Ryan; Frances M Van Dolah
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.244

10.  Characterization of bovine miRNAs by sequencing and bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Weiwu Jin; Jason R Grant; Paul Stothard; Stephen S Moore; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.946

View more
  7 in total

1.  Bovine dedifferentiated adipose tissue (DFAT) cells: DFAT cell isolation.

Authors:  Shengjuan Wei; Min Du; Zhihua Jiang; Marcio S Duarte; Melinda Fernyhough-Culver; Elke Albrecht; Katja Will; Linsen Zan; Gary J Hausman; Elham M Youssef Elabd; Werner G Bergen; Urmila Basu; Michael V Dodson
Journal:  Adipocyte       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Maternal Plane of Nutrition During Late-Gestation and Weaning Age Alter Steer Calf Longissimus Muscle Adipogenic MicroRNA and Target Gene Expression.

Authors:  Sonia J Moisá; Daniel W Shike; Lindsay Shoup; Juan J Loor
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 1.880

3.  Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Adipose Tissues Reveals that ECM-Receptor Interaction Is Involved in the Depot-Specific Adipogenesis in Cattle.

Authors:  Hyun-Jeong Lee; Mi Jang; Hyeongmin Kim; Woori Kwak; Woncheoul Park; Jae Yeon Hwang; Chang-Kyu Lee; Gul Won Jang; Mi Na Park; Hyeong-Cheol Kim; Jin Young Jeong; Kang Seok Seo; Heebal Kim; Seoae Cho; Bo-Young Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast Adipogenic Potential: A Comprehensive Transcriptome Analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Al-Sayegh; Hamad Ali; Mohammad H Jamal; Mei ElGindi; Tina Chanyong; Khulood Al-Awadi; Mohamed Abu-Farha
Journal:  Adipocyte       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Elucidation of molecular mechanisms of physiological variations between bovine subcutaneous and visceral fat depots under different nutritional regimes.

Authors:  Josue Moura Romao; Weiwu Jin; Maolong He; Tim McAllister; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  RNA-Seq Analysis Reveals a Positive Role of HTR2A in Adipogenesis in Yan Yellow Cattle.

Authors:  Jinyan Yun; Haiguo Jin; Yang Cao; Lichun Zhang; Yumin Zhao; Xin Jin; Yongsheng Yu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Adipogenesis, Osteogenesis, and Chondrogenesis of Human Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells: A Comparative Transcriptome Approach.

Authors:  Anny W Robert; Bruna H Marcon; Bruno Dallagiovanna; Patrícia Shigunov
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-07-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.