Literature DB >> 25031553

Current findings from research on structured abstracts: an update.

James Hartley1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25031553      PMCID： PMC4076121          DOI： 10.3163/1536-5050.102.3.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc        ISSN： 1536-5050


× No keyword cloud information.
  20 in total

Review 1.  Current findings from research on structured abstracts.

Authors:  James Hartley
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-07

Review 2.  A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: many informative elements missing.

Authors:  David A Cook; Thomas J Beckman; Georges Bordage
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Do recorded abstracts from scientific meetings concur with the research presented?

Authors:  J C Buchan; D M Spokes
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  [Abstracts at congresses of the German Society of Urology. Trends and quality].

Authors:  J von Hardenberg; T Worst; C Weiß; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Fate of abstracts presented at an International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH) congress--followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals?

Authors:  Laetitia Rollin; Stefan Darmoni; Jean-François Caillard; Jean-François Gehanno
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 5.024

6.  Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R M Pitkin; M A Branagan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Headings in structured abstracts.

Authors:  J Hartley
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  The restructuring of structured abstracts: adding a table in the results section.

Authors:  Howard Bauchner; Ronna Henry; Robert M Golub
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts.

Authors:  Elaine M Beller; Paul P Glasziou; Douglas G Altman; Sally Hopewell; Hilda Bastian; Iain Chalmers; Peter C Gøtzsche; Toby Lasserson; David Tovey
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  A structured interview guide for global impressions: increasing reliability and scoring accuracy for CNS trials.

Authors:  Steven D Targum; Celine Houser; Joanne Northcutt; Jessica A Little; Andrew J Cutler; David P Walling
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.455
View more
  7 in total

1.  What's new in abstracts of science articles.

Authors:  James Hartley
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2016-07

2.  A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Iveta Simera
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Quality of pharmacoeconomic research in China: A systematic review.

Authors:  Huifen Ma; Weiyan Jian; Tingting Xu; Yasheng He; John A Rizzo; Hai Fang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Interactive Visual Displays for Interpreting the Results of Clinical Trials: Formative Evaluation With Case Vignettes.

Authors:  Jiantao Bian; Charlene Weir; Prasad Unni; Damian Borbolla; Thomas Reese; Yik-Ki Jacob Wan; Guilherme Del Fiol
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 5.  Writing the title and abstract for a research paper: Being concise, precise, and meticulous is the key.

Authors:  Milind S Tullu
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2019-04

6.  How to Put It Plainly? Findings From Two Randomized Controlled Studies on Writing Plain Language Summaries for Psychological Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Martin Kerwer; Marlene Stoll; Mark Jonas; Gesa Benz; Anita Chasiotis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-16

Review 7.  The reporting quality of abstracts of stepped wedge randomized trials is suboptimal: A systematic survey of the literature.

Authors:  Mei Wang; Yanling Jin; Zheng Jing Hu; Alex Thabane; Brittany Dennis; Olga Gajic-Veljanoski; James Paul; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-08-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.