Literature DB >> 25030782

Moderate amounts of fructose- or glucose-sweetened beverages do not differentially alter metabolic health in male and female adolescents.

Timothy D Heden1, Ying Liu1, Young-Min Park1, Lauryn M Nyhoff1, Nathan C Winn1, Jill A Kanaley1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adolescents consume more sugar-sweetened beverages than do individuals in any other age group, but it is unknown how the type of sugar-sweetened beverage affects metabolic health in this population.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the metabolic health effects of short-term (2-wk) consumption of high-fructose (HF) and high-glucose (HG)-sweetened beverages in adolescents (15-20 y of age).
DESIGN: In a counterbalanced, single-blind fashion, 40 male and female adolescents completed two 2-wk trials that included 1) an HF trial in which they consumed 710 mL of a sugar-sweetened beverage/d (equivalent to 50 g fructose/d and 15 g glucose/d) for 2 wk and 2) an HG trial in which they consumed 710 mL of a sugar-sweetened beverage/d (equivalent to 50 g glucose/d and 15 g fructose/d) for 2 wk in addition to their normal ad libitum diet. In addition, the participants maintained similar physical activity levels during each trial. The day after each trial, insulin sensitivity and resistance [assessed via Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI) and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index] and fasting and postprandial glucose, lactate, lipid, cholesterol, insulin, C-peptide, insulin secretion, and clearance responses to HF or HG mixed meals were assessed.
RESULTS: Body weight, QUICKI (whole-body insulin sensitivity), HOMA-IR (hepatic insulin resistance), and fasting lipids, cholesterol, glucose, lactate, and insulin secretion or clearance were not different between trials. Fasting HDL- and HDL₃-cholesterol concentrations were ∼10-31% greater (P < 0.05) in female adolescents than in male adolescents. Postprandial triacylglycerol, HDL-cholesterol, HDL₃-cholesterol, and glucose concentrations were not different between HF and HG trials. The lactate incremental area under the curve was ∼3.7-fold greater during the HF trial (P < 0.05), whereas insulin secretion was 19% greater during the HG trial (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Moderate amounts of HF- or HG-sweetened beverages for 2 wk did not have differential effects on fasting or postprandial cholesterol, triacylglycerol, glucose, or hepatic insulin clearance in weight-stable, physically active adolescents.
© 2014 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25030782      PMCID: PMC4135490          DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.113.081232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  50 in total

Review 1.  Measures of body composition in blacks and whites: a comparative review.

Authors:  D R Wagner; V H Heyward
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Dietary fructose reduces circulating insulin and leptin, attenuates postprandial suppression of ghrelin, and increases triglycerides in women.

Authors:  Karen L Teff; Sharon S Elliott; Matthias Tschöp; Timothy J Kieffer; Daniel Rader; Mark Heiman; Raymond R Townsend; Nancy L Keim; David D'Alessio; Peter J Havel
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Low to moderate sugar-sweetened beverage consumption impairs glucose and lipid metabolism and promotes inflammation in healthy young men: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Isabelle Aeberli; Philipp A Gerber; Michel Hochuli; Sibylle Kohler; Sarah R Haile; Ioanna Gouni-Berthold; Heiner K Berthold; Giatgen A Spinas; Kaspar Berneis
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Children with NAFLD are more sensitive to the adverse metabolic effects of fructose beverages than children without NAFLD.

Authors:  Ran Jin; Ngoc-Anh Le; Shuling Liu; Monica Farkas Epperson; Thomas R Ziegler; Jean A Welsh; Dean P Jones; Craig J McClain; Miriam B Vos
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Effect of eucaloric high- and low-sucrose diets with identical macronutrient profile on insulin resistance and vascular risk: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R Neil A Black; Michelle Spence; Ross O McMahon; Geraldine J Cuskelly; Cieran N Ennis; David R McCance; Ian S Young; Patrick M Bell; Steven J Hunter
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  Metabolic adaptation to high-fat and high-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Margarita S Treuth; Agneta L Sunehag; Lynn M Trautwein; Dennis M Bier; Morey W Haymond; Nancy F Butte
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Consumption of sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup does not increase liver fat or ectopic fat deposition in muscles.

Authors:  Stephen Bravo; Joshua Lowndes; Stephanie Sinnett; Zhiping Yu; James Rippe
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.665

8.  Effects of fructose and glucose overfeeding on hepatic insulin sensitivity and intrahepatic lipids in healthy humans.

Authors:  V Lecoultre; L Egli; G Carrel; F Theytaz; R Kreis; P Schneiter; A Boss; K Zwygart; K-A Lê; M Bortolotti; C Boesch; L Tappy
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Consumption of fructose- but not glucose-sweetened beverages for 10 weeks increases circulating concentrations of uric acid, retinol binding protein-4, and gamma-glutamyl transferase activity in overweight/obese humans.

Authors:  Chad L Cox; Kimber L Stanhope; Jean Marc Schwarz; James L Graham; Bonnie Hatcher; Steven C Griffen; Andrew A Bremer; Lars Berglund; John P McGahan; Nancy L Keim; Peter J Havel
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.169

10.  No difference between high-fructose and high-glucose diets on liver triacylglycerol or biochemistry in healthy overweight men.

Authors:  Richard D Johnston; Mary C Stephenson; Hannah Crossland; Sally M Cordon; Elisa Palcidi; Eleanor F Cox; Moira A Taylor; Guruprasad P Aithal; Ian A Macdonald
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  12 in total

1.  Metabolic Implications of Diet and Energy Intake during Physical Inactivity.

Authors:  Nathan C Winn; Ryan Pettit-Mee; Lauren K Walsh; Robert M Restaino; Sean T Ready; Jaume Padilla; Jill A Kanaley
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Added Sugars and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Children: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Miriam B Vos; Jill L Kaar; Jean A Welsh; Linda V Van Horn; Daniel I Feig; Cheryl A M Anderson; Mahesh J Patel; Jessica Cruz Munos; Nancy F Krebs; Stavra A Xanthakos; Rachel K Johnson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Effect of Fructose on Established Lipid Targets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Feeding Trials.

Authors:  Laura Chiavaroli; Russell J de Souza; Vanessa Ha; Adrian I Cozma; Arash Mirrahimi; David D Wang; Matthew Yu; Amanda J Carleton; Marco Di Buono; Alexandra L Jenkins; Lawrence A Leiter; Thomas M S Wolever; Joseph Beyene; Cyril W C Kendall; David J A Jenkins; John L Sievenpiper
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  The ecologic validity of fructose feeding trials: supraphysiological feeding of fructose in human trials requires careful consideration when drawing conclusions on cardiometabolic risk.

Authors:  Vivian L Choo; John L Sievenpiper
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2015-05-06

Review 5.  Risks of misinterpretation in the evaluation of the effect of fruit-based drinks in postprandial studies.

Authors:  Ilaria Peluso; Maura Palmery
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 6.  A review of recent evidence relating to sugars, insulin resistance and diabetes.

Authors:  I A Macdonald
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 7.  High Dietary Fructose: Direct or Indirect Dangerous Factors Disturbing Tissue and Organ Functions.

Authors:  Dong-Mei Zhang; Rui-Qing Jiao; Ling-Dong Kong
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Frequent Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption and the Onset of Cardiometabolic Diseases: Cause for Concern?

Authors:  Gaurang Deshpande; Rudo F Mapanga; M Faadiel Essop
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2017-11-02

9.  Food sources of fructose-containing sugars and glycaemic control: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled intervention studies.

Authors:  Vivian L Choo; Effie Viguiliouk; Sonia Blanco Mejia; Adrian I Cozma; Tauseef A Khan; Vanessa Ha; Thomas M S Wolever; Lawrence A Leiter; Vladimir Vuksan; Cyril W C Kendall; Russell J de Souza; David J A Jenkins; John L Sievenpiper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-11-21

10.  The Effect of Small Doses of Fructose and Its Epimers on Glycemic Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Feeding Trials.

Authors:  Jarvis C Noronha; Catherine R Braunstein; Sonia Blanco Mejia; Tauseef A Khan; Cyril W C Kendall; Thomas M S Wolever; Lawrence A Leiter; John L Sievenpiper
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.