Literature DB >> 25030551

Annual bone loss and success rates of dental implants based on radiographic measurements.

W Geraets1, L Zhang, Y Liu, D Wismeijer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bone loss around dental implants is generally measured by monitoring changes in marginal bone level using radiographs. After the first year of implantation, an implant should have <0.2 mm annual loss of marginal bone level to satisfy the criteria of success. However, the process of measuring marginal bone level on radiographs has a precision of 0.2 mm (or more) owing to variations in exposure geometry, exposure time and observer perception. Therefore, the value of the annual loss may vary considerably, especially when short intervals are considered. This study investigates how the success rate of dental implants depends on the way annual bone loss is calculated.
METHODS: Panoramic radiographs of 82 implant patients with an average follow-up of 10.4 years were analysed. Marginal bone levels near the implants were indicated by one observer. The annual loss of marginal bone level was determined according to four different calculation methods.
RESULTS: The methods yielded success rates of 9%, 45%, 81% and 89%.
CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of dental implants measured on radiographs greatly depends on the details of the calculation method. Without rigorous standardization, annual bone loss and implant success rate are not well defined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  criteria; marginal distance; noise; radiographs; success rate

Year:  2014        PMID: 25030551      PMCID: PMC4170845          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  25 in total

1.  Mathematical analysis of projection errors in "paralleling technique" with respect to implant geometry.

Authors:  R K Schulze; B d'Hoedt
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with three treatment modalities for overdentures on implants of the ITI Dental Implant System. A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  D Wismeijer; M A van Waas; J Mulder; J I Vermeeren; W Kalk
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants.

Authors:  D Wismeijer; M A Van Waas; J I Vermeeren; J Mulder; W Kalk
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures.

Authors:  G T Stoker; D Wismeijer; M A J van Waas
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 5.  Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla.

Authors:  France E Lambert; Hans-Peter Weber; Srinivas M Susarla; Urs C Belser; German O Gallucci
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  Detecting bone loss along dental implants by subtraction of panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Wil G M Geraets; Hans G C Verheij; Daniel Wismeijer; Paul F van der Stelt
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology.

Authors:  M Esposito; J M Hirsch; U Lekholm; P Thomsen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.612

8.  Long-term outcomes of three types of implant-supported mandibular overdentures in smokers.

Authors:  Geert Stoker; Rien van Waas; Daniël Wismeijer
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Long-term implant survival and success: a 10-16-year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants.

Authors:  Pierre Simonis; Thomas Dufour; Henri Tenenbaum
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible.

Authors:  German O Gallucci; Camden B Doughtie; Jae Woong Hwang; Joseph P Fiorellini; Hans-Peter Weber
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bone remodeling around dental implants after 1-1.5 years of functional loading: A retrospective analysis of two-stage implants.

Authors:  Poyan Maghsoudi; Dagmar E Slot; Fridus G A van der Weijden
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-04-15

2.  Evaluation of Clinical Parameters in Implant Maintenance Phase for Prevention of Peri-implantitis.

Authors:  Baburajan Kandasamy; Emmanuel P Samson; Ashfaq Yaqoob; Pragya Pandey; S Deenadayalan; Indrani Das
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2018-07-18

3.  Effect of restoration material on marginal bone resorption around modified anatomic zirconia dental implants: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Alaa Aldebes; Nuraldeen Maher Al-Khanati; Jihad Abou Nassar; Nour Al-Deen Kharboutly; Feras Aldamman
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-02

4.  The Crucial Role of Plaque Control in Peri-Implant Mucositis Initiation as Opposed to the Role of Systemic Health Condition: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ali Raad AbdulAzeez; Athil Adnan Alkinani
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2021-06-25

5.  Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments.

Authors:  Sven Marcus Beschnidt; Claudio Cacaci; Kerem Dedeoglu; Detlef Hildebrand; Helfried Hulla; Gerhard Iglhaut; Gerald Krennmair; Markus Schlee; Paul Sipos; Andres Stricker; Karl-Ludwig Ackermann
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-11-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.