Kamakshi Lakshminarayan1, Alan K Berger2, Candace C Fuller2, David R Jacobs2, David C Anderson2, Lyn M Steffen2, Arthur Sillah2, Russell V Luepker2. 1. From the Division of Epidemiology and Community, School of Public Health (K.L., D.R.J., L.M.S., R.V.L.), Department of Medicine, Division of Interventional Cardiology (A.K.B.), and Department of Neurology, Medical School (D.C.A.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare Institute, Boston, MA (C.C.F.); and Division of Applied Research, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN (A.S.). laksh004@umn.edu. 2. From the Division of Epidemiology and Community, School of Public Health (K.L., D.R.J., L.M.S., R.V.L.), Department of Medicine, Division of Interventional Cardiology (A.K.B.), and Department of Neurology, Medical School (D.C.A.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare Institute, Boston, MA (C.C.F.); and Division of Applied Research, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN (A.S.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We report on trends in poststroke survival, both in the early period after stroke and over the long term. We examine these trends by stroke subtype. METHODS: The Minnesota Stroke Survey is a study of all hospitalized patients with acute stroke aged 30 to 74 years in the Minneapolis-St Paul metropolis. Validated stroke events were sampled for survey years 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995, and 2000 and subtyped as ischemic or hemorrhagic by neuroimaging for survey years 1990, 1995, and 2000. Survival was obtained by linkage to vital statistics data through the year 2010. RESULTS: There were 3773 acute stroke events. Age-adjusted 10-year survival improved from 1980 to 2000 (men 29.5% and 46.5%; P<0.0001; women 32.6% and 50.5%; P<0.0001). Ten-year ischemic stroke survival (n=1667) improved from 1990 to 2000 (men 35.3% and 50%; P=0.0001; women 38% and 55.3%; P<0.0001). Ten-year hemorrhagic stroke survival showed a trend toward improvement, but this (n=489) did not reach statistical significance, perhaps because of their smaller number (men 29.7% and 45.8%; P=0.06; women 39.2% and 49.6%; P=0.2). Markers of stroke severity including unconsciousness or major neurological deficits at admission declined from 1980 to 2000 while neuroimaging use increased. CONCLUSIONS: These poststroke survival trends are likely because of multiple factors, including more sensitive case ascertainment shifting the case mix toward less severe strokes, improved stroke care and risk factor management, and overall improvements in population health and longevity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We report on trends in poststroke survival, both in the early period after stroke and over the long term. We examine these trends by stroke subtype. METHODS: The Minnesota Stroke Survey is a study of all hospitalized patients with acute stroke aged 30 to 74 years in the Minneapolis-St Paul metropolis. Validated stroke events were sampled for survey years 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995, and 2000 and subtyped as ischemic or hemorrhagic by neuroimaging for survey years 1990, 1995, and 2000. Survival was obtained by linkage to vital statistics data through the year 2010. RESULTS: There were 3773 acute stroke events. Age-adjusted 10-year survival improved from 1980 to 2000 (men 29.5% and 46.5%; P<0.0001; women 32.6% and 50.5%; P<0.0001). Ten-year ischemic stroke survival (n=1667) improved from 1990 to 2000 (men 35.3% and 50%; P=0.0001; women 38% and 55.3%; P<0.0001). Ten-year hemorrhagic stroke survival showed a trend toward improvement, but this (n=489) did not reach statistical significance, perhaps because of their smaller number (men 29.7% and 45.8%; P=0.06; women 39.2% and 49.6%; P=0.2). Markers of stroke severity including unconsciousness or major neurological deficits at admission declined from 1980 to 2000 while neuroimaging use increased. CONCLUSIONS: These poststroke survival trends are likely because of multiple factors, including more sensitive case ascertainment shifting the case mix toward less severe strokes, improved stroke care and risk factor management, and overall improvements in population health and longevity.
Authors: Russell V Luepker; Donna K Arnett; David R Jacobs; Susan J Duval; Aaron R Folsom; Christopher Armstrong; Henry Blackburn Journal: Am J Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: W D Rosamond; A R Folsom; L E Chambless; C H Wang; P G McGovern; G Howard; L S Copper; E Shahar Journal: Stroke Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Daniel T Lackland; Edward J Roccella; Anne F Deutsch; Myriam Fornage; Mary G George; George Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Lee H Schwamm; Eric E Smith; Amytis Towfighi Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Valery L Feigin; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Rita Krishnamurthi; George A Mensah; Myles Connor; Derrick A Bennett; Andrew E Moran; Ralph L Sacco; Laurie Anderson; Thomas Truelsen; Martin O'Donnell; Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Carlene M M Lawes; Wenzhi Wang; Yukito Shinohara; Emma Witt; Majid Ezzati; Mohsen Naghavi; Christopher Murray Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-01-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jordan B Strom; Yuansong Zhao; Kamil F Faridi; Hector Tamez; Neel M Butala; Linda R Valsdottir; Jeptha Curtis; J Matthew Brennan; Changyu Shen; Mike Boulware; Jeffrey J Popma; Robert W Yeh Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Eva S Emmett; Abdel Douiri; Iain J Marshall; Charles D A Wolfe; Anthony G Rudd; Ajay Bhalla Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 3.240