Literature DB >> 25027539

Sterile product compounding using an i.v. compounding workflow management system at a pediatric hospital.

Thomas T Moniz1, Stephen Chu2, Crystal Tom2, Peter Lutz2, Alana Arnold2, Kathleen M Gura2, Al Patterson2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient safety enhancements achieved through the use of an automated i.v. compounding workflow management system are reported.
SUMMARY: Automated systems integrating barcode verification of ingredients and the capture of serial images of all steps of the admixture process have the potential to improve the accuracy of parenteral i.v. medication dose preparation. About 18 months after the implementation of such a system at a large pediatric hospital, a retrospective analysis of dose preparation outcomes was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the i.v. workflow manager in detecting compounding errors and to categorize detected errors. In verifying the accuracy of 425,683 medication doses prepared during the approximately 13-month evaluation period, dispensing pharmacists detected preparation or documentation errors affecting 2,900 doses (0.68%); 1,223 of those doses (0.29%) required reworking, and 1,677 (0.4%) were rejected and destroyed. Roughly 23% of the detected errors were classified as undetectable via the pharmacy's previous verification practices, with 167 errors judged to pose the potential for adverse drug events resulting in moderate (n=146) or severe (n=21) harm. Among the reworked and rejected doses, 43.8% and 31.3%, respectively, were due to newly emergent problems not seen with traditional paper-based verification systems; however, most of these errors involved blurry or missing images and were not judged to be clinically significant.
CONCLUSION: Implementation of an i.v. workflow management system that integrates barcode verification, automated calculations, and image-capture capabilities led to increased detection of errors in the sterile product compounding process.
Copyright © 2014 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25027539     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp130649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  5 in total

1.  Critical Evaluation of Pharmacy Automation and Robotic Systems: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Anthony M Boyd; Bruce W Chaffee
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2018-07-09

2.  Innovations in Medication Preparation Safety and Wastage Reduction: Use of a Workflow Management System in a Pediatric Hospital.

Authors:  Stephen Jerome Davis; Josephine Hurtado; Rosemary Nguyen; Tran Huynh; Ivan Lindon; Cedric Hudnall; Sara Bork
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-01

Review 3.  Systematic evidence review of rates and burden of harm of intravenous admixture drug preparation errors in healthcare settings.

Authors:  Nancy Hedlund; Idal Beer; Torsten Hoppe-Tichy; Patricia Trbovich
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Intravenous Chemotherapy Compounding Errors in a Follow-Up Pan-Canadian Observational Study.

Authors:  Rachel E Gilbert; Melissa C Kozak; Roxanne B Dobish; Venetia C Bourrier; Paul M Koke; Vishal Kukreti; Heather A Logan; Anthony C Easty; Patricia L Trbovich
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Impact of technology-assisted versus manual sterile compounding on safety and efficiency in a Canadian community hospital.

Authors:  Mark Fan; Danny Yang; Becky Ng; Jocelyn Jackson; Katherine Bouris; Sharon Eng; Edith Rolko; Patricia Trbovich
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 2.980

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.