Literature DB >> 25027301

Transparent magnesium aluminate spinel: a prospective biomaterial for esthetic orthodontic brackets.

Manu Krishnan1, Brijesh Tiwari, Saraswathy Seema, Namitha Kalra, Papiya Biswas, Kotikalapudi Rajeswari, Madireddy Buchi Suresh, Roy Johnson, Nitin M Gokhale, Satish R Iyer, Sanjay Londhe, Vimal Arora, Rajendra P Tripathi.   

Abstract

Adult orthodontics is recently gaining popularity due to its importance in esthetics, oral and general health. However, none of the currently available alumina or zirconia based ceramic orthodontic brackets meet the esthetic demands of adult patients. Inherent hexagonal lattice structure and associated birefringence limits the visible light transmission in polycrystalline alumina and make them appear white and non transparent. Hence focus of the present study was to assess the feasibility of using magnesium aluminate (MgAl2O4) spinel; a member of the transparent ceramic family for esthetic orthodontic brackets. Transparent spinel specimens were developed from commercially available white spinel powder through colloidal shaping followed by pressureless sintering and hot isostatic pressing at optimum conditions of temperature and pressure. Samples were characterized for chemical composition, phases, density, hardness, flexural strength, fracture toughness and optical transmission. Biocompatibility was evaluated with in-vitro cell line experiments for cytotoxicity, apoptosis and genotoxicity. Results showed that transparent spinel samples had requisite physico-chemical, mechanical, optical and excellent biocompatibility for fabricating orthodontic brackets. Transparent spinel developed through this method demonstrated its possibility as a prospective biomaterial for developing esthetic orthodontic brackets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25027301     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5268-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  21 in total

Review 1.  Ceramic brackets and the need to develop national standards.

Authors:  S E Bishara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Treatment outcome analysis of speedy surgical orthodontics for adults with maxillary protrusion.

Authors:  HyeRan Choo; Hyun-A Heo; Hyun-Joong Yoon; Kyu-Rhim Chung; Seong-Hun Kim
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 3.  In vitro genotoxicity testing using the micronucleus assay in cell lines, human lymphocytes and 3D human skin models.

Authors:  Micheline Kirsch-Volders; Ilse Decordier; Azeddine Elhajouji; Gina Plas; Marilyn J Aardema; Michael Fenech
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  Aesthetic orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  J S Russell
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2005-06

Review 5.  On the mechanisms of biocompatibility.

Authors:  David F Williams
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Cell sensitivity assays : the MTT assay.

Authors:  J A Plumb
Journal:  Methods Mol Med       Date:  1999

Review 7.  In vitro models of biocompatibility: a review.

Authors:  C T Hanks; J C Wataha; Z Sun
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Ceramic brackets.

Authors:  M L Swartz
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1988-02

9.  Assessment of motivation and psychological characteristics of adult orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Sona Pabari; David R Moles; Susan J Cunningham
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Biocompatibility evaluation of a novel hydroxyapatite-polymer coating for medical implants (in vitro tests).

Authors:  Gabriela Negroiu; Roxana M Piticescu; Gabrielle C Chitanu; Ion N Mihailescu; Livia Zdrentu; Marimona Miroiu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.