Literature DB >> 25026534

Spiders do not evoke greater early posterior negativity in the event-related potential as snakes.

Hongshen He1, Kenta Kubo, Nobuyuki Kawai.   

Abstract

It has been long believed that both snakes and spiders are archetypal fear stimuli for humans. Furthermore, snakes have been assumed as stronger threat cues for nonhuman primates. However, it is still unclear whether spiders hold a special status in human perception. The current study explored to what extent spider pictures draw early visual attention [as assessed with early posterior negativity (EPN)] when compared with insects similar to spiders. To measure the EPN, participants watched a random rapid serial presentation of pictures, which consisted of two conditions: spider condition (spider, wasp, bumblebee, beetle) and snake condition (snake, bird). EPN amplitudes revealed no significant difference between spider, wasp, bumblebee, and beetle pictures, whereas EPN amplitudes were significantly larger for snake pictures relative to bird pictures. In addition, EPN amplitudes were significantly larger for snake pictures relative to spider pictures. These results suggest that the early visual attentional capture of animate objects is stronger for snakes, whereas spiders do not appear to hold special early attentional value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25026534     DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  9 in total

1.  Scales drive detection, attention, and memory of snakes in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus).

Authors:  Lynne A Isbell; Stephanie F Etting
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Testing the snake-detection hypothesis: larger early posterior negativity in humans to pictures of snakes than to pictures of other reptiles, spiders and slugs.

Authors:  Jan W Van Strien; Ingmar H A Franken; Jorg Huijding
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Breaking Snake Camouflage: Humans Detect Snakes More Accurately than Other Animals under Less Discernible Visual Conditions.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kawai; Hongshen He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Fast Detector/First Responder: Interactions between the Superior Colliculus-Pulvinar Pathway and Stimuli Relevant to Primates.

Authors:  Sandra C Soares; Rafael S Maior; Lynne A Isbell; Carlos Tomaz; Hisao Nishijo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Snake scales, partial exposure, and the Snake Detection Theory: A human event-related potentials study.

Authors:  Jan W Van Strien; Lynne A Isbell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Implicit emotion regulation deficits in individuals with high schizotypal traits: an ERP study.

Authors:  Delhii Hoid; Dong-Ni Pan; Yi Wang; Xuebing Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Measuring fear evoked by the scariest animal: Czech versions of the Spider Questionnaire and Spider Phobia Beliefs Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jakub Polák; Kristýna Sedláčková; Markéta Janovcová; Šárka Peléšková; Jaroslav Flegr; Barbora Vobrubová; Daniel Frynta; Eva Landová
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Enhanced early visual processing in response to snake and trypophobic stimuli.

Authors:  Jan W Van Strien; Manja K Van der Peijl
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2018-05-02

9.  Early posterior negativity in humans to pictures of snakes and spiders: effects of proximity.

Authors:  Nick Beligiannis; Jan W Van Strien
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.