BACKGROUND: The apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype is associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease. In community surveys, older adults with this genotype have been found to have lower scores on neuropsychological tests than those who do not. It is possible that this is the consequence of subclinical changes in cognition in those persons who later develop dementia. The aim of this research was to determine whether the effect of APOE genotype on cognition would remain if those who subsequently became demented were retrospectively removed from the analysis of the baseline test data from a sample of healthy adults. METHOD: A sample of 241 nondemented persons over the age of 65 for whom APOE genotyping was available were administered a range of neuropsychological tests at baseline and were followed up 10 years later. RESULTS: Significant differences between the ε4-present and ε4-absent groups were found for the delayed recall trial of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and the Trail Making Test. When those participants known to have developed dementia during the follow-up period were excluded from the analysis of the baseline data these differences disappeared. A total of 113 nondemented survivors from the original sample were retested, and no difference was found in the rate of decline on any measure between the ε4-present and ε4-absent groups. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that the reported effect of the ε4 APOE genotype on cognition is the consequence of the ε4-present group containing persons whose cognition is subtly affected by the early stages of a dementing process. It is also unlikely that the presence of the ε4 allele by itself leads to a significantly accelerated rate of cognitive decline in the nondemented elderly.
BACKGROUND: The apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype is associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease. In community surveys, older adults with this genotype have been found to have lower scores on neuropsychological tests than those who do not. It is possible that this is the consequence of subclinical changes in cognition in those persons who later develop dementia. The aim of this research was to determine whether the effect of APOE genotype on cognition would remain if those who subsequently became demented were retrospectively removed from the analysis of the baseline test data from a sample of healthy adults. METHOD: A sample of 241 nondemented persons over the age of 65 for whom APOE genotyping was available were administered a range of neuropsychological tests at baseline and were followed up 10 years later. RESULTS: Significant differences between the ε4-present and ε4-absent groups were found for the delayed recall trial of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and the Trail Making Test. When those participants known to have developed dementia during the follow-up period were excluded from the analysis of the baseline data these differences disappeared. A total of 113 nondemented survivors from the original sample were retested, and no difference was found in the rate of decline on any measure between the ε4-present and ε4-absent groups. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that the reported effect of the ε4 APOE genotype on cognition is the consequence of the ε4-present group containing persons whose cognition is subtly affected by the early stages of a dementing process. It is also unlikely that the presence of the ε4 allele by itself leads to a significantly accelerated rate of cognitive decline in the nondemented elderly.
Entities:
Keywords:
Apolipoprotein E; Cognition; Older adult; Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; Trail Making Test
Authors: Owen A Williams; Yang An; Nicole M Armstrong; Andrea T Shafer; Jessica Helphrey; Melissa Kitner-Triolo; Luigi Ferrucci; Susan M Resnick Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Lin Chen; Anja Soldan; Kenichi Oishi; Andreia Faria; Yuxin Zhu; Marilyn Albert; Peter C M van Zijl; Xu Li Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Mark James Rawle; Daniel Davis; Rebecca Bendayan; Andrew Wong; Diana Kuh; Marcus Richards Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: M Richards; Sarah-Naomi James; Alison Sizer; Nikhil Sharma; Mark Rawle; Daniel H J Davis; Diana Kuh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Juliet Fockler; Winnie Kwang; Miriam T Ashford; Derek Flenniken; Joshua Hwang; Diana Truran; R Scott Mackin; Chengshi Jin; Ruth O'Hara; Joachim F Hallmayer; Jerome A Yesavage; Michael W Weiner; Rachel L Nosheny Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Date: 2021-02-14