Literature DB >> 25025517

A controlled double blind study comparing the effects of strong Burst Mode TENS and High Rate TENS on painful osteoarthritic knees.

K Grimmer.   

Abstract

This double blind, controlled study compared the changes in pain, stiffness, circumference and range of movement, produced by one 30 minute application of High Rate TENS, or strong Burst Mode TENS on chronic osteoarthritic knees. Both TENS applications were applied at strong, tolerable intensities for 30 minutes, over four acupuncture points around the knee. Pain, stiffness, circumference, and range of movement measurements were recorded immediately before and after the TENS applications. Length of continuation of pain relief and alteration in stiffness was reported by subjects. The study aimed to establish whether strong Burst Mode TENS produced significantly greater and longer lasting changes than those produced by High Rate TENS. The only significant change produced by strong Burst Mode when compared with High Rate TENS was on knee circumference.
Copyright © 1992 Australian Physiotherapy Association. Published by . All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double blind method; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Year:  1992        PMID: 25025517     DOI: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60551-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Physiother        ISSN: 0004-9514


  6 in total

1.  Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain, pain sensitivity, and function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carol Grace T Vance; Barbara A Rakel; Nicole P Blodgett; Josimari Melo DeSantana; Annunziato Amendola; Miriam Bridget Zimmerman; Deirdre M Walsh; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-30

Review 2.  Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Priscilla G Wittkopf; Matthew R Mulvey; Gareth Jones
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.948

3.  Effects of noninvasive interactive neurostimulation on symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, sham-controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Terry Kit Selfe; Cheryl Bourguignon; Ann Gill Taylor
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.579

Review 4.  Transcutaneous electrostimulation for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Anne Ws Rutjes; Eveline Nüesch; Rebekka Sterchi; Leonid Kalichman; Erik Hendriks; Manathip Osiri; Lucie Brosseau; Stephan Reichenbach; Peter Jüni
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

5.  Efficacy and Safety of a Stimulator Using Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Combined with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients with Painful Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Eu-Deum Kim; Yu Hui Won; Sung-Hee Park; Jeon-Hwan Seo; Da-Sol Kim; Myoung-Hwan Ko; Gi-Wook Kim
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2019-06-16       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 6.  Short-term efficacy of physical interventions in osteoarthritic knee pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Jan M Bjordal; Mark I Johnson; Rodrigo A B Lopes-Martins; Bård Bogen; Roberta Chow; Anne E Ljunggren
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.