| Literature DB >> 25024727 |
Junli Yang1, Gerhard Litscher2, Haitao Li1, Wenhai Guo1, Zhang Liang1, Ting Zhang1, Weihua Wang1, Xiaoyan Li1, Yao Zhou1, Bing Zhao1, Qi Rong1, Zemin Sheng3, Ingrid Gaischek4, Daniela Litscher4, Lu Wang2.
Abstract
We observed the effect of scalp point cluster-needling treatment on learning and memory function and neurotransmitter levels in rats with vascular dementia (VD). Permanent ligation of the bilateral carotid arteries was used to create the VD rat model. A Morris water maze was used to measure the rats' learning and memory function, and the changes in neurotransmitter levels in the rats' hippocampus were analyzed. The results show that scalp point cluster-needling can increase the VD rat model's learning and memory score. The VD rat model's learning and memory score was significantly different when compared with that of the sham operation group (P < 0.05). Hippocampal acetylcholine (ACh), dopamine (DA), and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) concentrations significantly decreased in the rat model. Compared with the model group, the scalp point cluster-needling group's ACh concentration markedly increased and DA and 5-HT levels increased as well. In conclusion, scalp point cluster-needling can improve learning and memory function in VD rats, and its function may be related to an increase in neurotransmitter release.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25024727 PMCID: PMC4082888 DOI: 10.1155/2014/294103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Cluster-needling (note: frontal region: Shenting penetrating Baihui and parallel from Qucha to Benshen. Directly below is the front area of the frontal lobe; parietal region: Baihui penetrating Qianding and 1 cun lateral to right and left Sishencong. Directly below is the precentral gyrus, postcentral gyrus, paracentral lobule, and a portion of the superior parietal lobule and inferior parietal lobule; frontoparietal region: Qianding penetrating Xinghui and Tongtian penetrating Chengguang and Zhengying penetrating Muchuang on both sides. Directly below is the superior frontal gyrus and posterior portion of the middle frontal gyrus).
Different treatment groups and interventions.
| Sham operation group | Model group | Positive control group | Cluster-needling group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carotid artery ligation | — | X | X | X |
| Acupuncture at Baihui and Dazhui | — | — | X | — |
| Scalp point cluster needling | — | — | — | X |
Treatment diagram for each group.
| Group | Treatment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Times/day | Acupoint selection | Needle retention duration | Duration between needle rotation manipulations | Needle rotating frequency | Rotation manipulation duration | |
| Scalp point cluster-needling group | 1 | Frontal region, frontoparietal region, and parietal region | 6 hours | 1 hour | Approx. | 3 minutes |
| Positive control group | 1 | Baihui, Dazhui | 1 hour | 10 minutes | Approx. | 3 minutes |
| Model group | None | |||||
| Sham operation group | None | |||||
Figure 2Flowchart of the experimental study.
Comparison of water maze navigation test results for each group (mean ± SD).
| Group | Mean escape latency period [s] | Mean swimming distance [cm] |
|---|---|---|
| Sham operation group | 16.12 ± 6.34∗∗ | 105.76 ± 16.73∗ |
| Model group | 115.36 ± 13.31 | 174.74 ± 15.81 |
| Positive control group | 107.52 ± 16.11 | 157.65 ± 16.11 |
| Cluster-needling group | 62.02 ± 11.61∗∗△ | 124.19 ± 14.25∗∗△ |
Compared with the model group, *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01; compared with the positive control group, △ P < 0.05.
Hippocampal ACh, DA, and 5-HT measurements for each group (mean ± SD, n = 12 per group).
| Group | ACh [ | DA [ng/g] | 5-HT [ng/g] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham operation group | 27.52 ± 3.13∗∗ | 521.23 ± 32.54∗∗ | 652.36 ± 186.13∗∗ |
| Model group | 14.39 ± 1.27 | 362.71 ± 43.15 | 435.85 ± 152.27 |
| Positive control group | 19.05 ± 1.98∗ | 398.72 ± 34.51∗ | 525.45 ± 147.33∗ |
| Cluster-needling group | 25.82 ± 4.61∗∗△ | 448.63 ± 38.62∗∗△ | 597.59 ± 146.35∗∗△ |
Compared with the model group, *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01; compared with the positive control group, △ P < 0.05.