Literature DB >> 25024290

An improved method for computing q-values when the distribution of effect sizes is asymmetric.

Megan Orr1, Peng Liu1, Dan Nettleton1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Asymmetry is frequently observed in the empirical distribution of test statistics that results from the analysis of gene expression experiments. This asymmetry indicates an asymmetry in the distribution of effect sizes. A common method for identifying differentially expressed (DE) genes in a gene expression experiment while controlling false discovery rate (FDR) is Storey's q-value method. This method ranks genes based solely on the P-values from each gene in the experiment.
RESULTS: We propose a method that alters and improves upon the q-value method by taking the sign of the test statistics, in addition to the P-values, into account. Through two simulation studies (one involving independent normal data and one involving microarray data), we show that the proposed method, when compared with the traditional q-value method, generally provides a better ranking for genes as well as a higher number of truly DE genes declared to be DE, while still adequately controlling FDR. We illustrate the proposed method by analyzing two microarray datasets, one from an experiment of thale cress seedlings and the other from an experiment of maize leaves.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R code and data files for the proposed method and examples are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25024290      PMCID: PMC4609005          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  9 in total

1.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository.

Authors:  Ron Edgar; Michael Domrachev; Alex E Lash
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies.

Authors:  John D Storey; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments.

Authors:  Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2004-02-12

Review 4.  Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA microarrays.

Authors:  P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  Sequencing technologies - the next generation.

Authors:  Michael L Metzker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Transcriptional genomics associates FOX transcription factors with human heart failure.

Authors:  Sridhar Hannenhalli; Mary E Putt; Joan M Gilmore; Junwen Wang; Michael S Parmacek; Jonathan A Epstein; Edward E Morrisey; Kenneth B Margulies; Thomas P Cappola
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  A homolog of splicing factor SF1 is essential for development and is involved in the alternative splicing of pre-mRNA in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Yun Hee Jang; Hyo-Young Park; Keh Chien Lee; May Phyo Thu; Soon-Kap Kim; Mi Chung Suh; Hunseung Kang; Jeong-Kook Kim
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  Deregulation of maize C4 photosynthetic development in a mesophyll cell-defective mutant.

Authors:  Sarah Covshoff; Wojciech Majeran; Peng Liu; Judith M Kolkman; Klaas J van Wijk; Thomas P Brutnell
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Hypoxia-like transcriptional activation in TMT-induced degeneration: microarray expression analysis on PC12 cells.

Authors:  Wanda Lattanzi; Camilla Bernardini; Carlo Gangitano; Fabrizio Michetti
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.372

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.