Leonie Heyworth1, Ronen Rozenblum2, James F Burgess3, Errol Baker3, Mark Meterko3, Debra Prescott4, Zeev Neuwirth5, Steven R Simon6. 1. Veterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts lheyworth@gmail.com. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Veterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts. 4. Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Newton, Massachusetts. 5. Carolinas Healthcare, Charlotte, North Carolina. 6. Veterans Administration Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Shared medical appointments (SMAs) are becoming popular, but little is known about their association with patient experience in primary care. We performed an exploratory analysis examining overall satisfaction and patient-centered care experiences across key domains of the patient-centered medical home among patients attending SMAs vs usual care appointments. METHODS: We undertook a cross-sectional study using a mailed questionnaire measuring levels of patient satisfaction and other indicators of patient-centered care among 921 SMA and 921 usual care patients between 2008 and 2010. Propensity scores adjusted for potential case mix differences between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression assessed propensity-matched patients' ratings of care. Generalized estimating equations accounted for physician-level clustering. RESULTS: A total of 40% of SMA patients and 31% of usual care patients responded. In adjusted analyses, SMA patients were more likely to rate their overall satisfaction with care as "very good" when compared with usual care counterparts (odds ratio=1.26; 95% CI, 1.05-1.52). In the analysis of patient-centered medical home elements, SMA patients rated their care as more accessible and more sensitive to their needs, whereas usual care patients reported greater satisfaction with physician communication and time spent during their appointment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, SMA patients appear more satisfied with their care relative to patients receiving usual care. SMAs may also improve access to care and deliver care that patients find to be sensitive to their needs. Further research should focus on enhancing patient-clinician communication within an SMA as this model of care becomes more widely adopted.
PURPOSE: Shared medical appointments (SMAs) are becoming popular, but little is known about their association with patient experience in primary care. We performed an exploratory analysis examining overall satisfaction and patient-centered care experiences across key domains of the patient-centered medical home among patients attending SMAs vs usual care appointments. METHODS: We undertook a cross-sectional study using a mailed questionnaire measuring levels of patient satisfaction and other indicators of patient-centered care among 921 SMA and 921 usual care patients between 2008 and 2010. Propensity scores adjusted for potential case mix differences between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression assessed propensity-matched patients' ratings of care. Generalized estimating equations accounted for physician-level clustering. RESULTS: A total of 40% of SMApatients and 31% of usual care patients responded. In adjusted analyses, SMApatients were more likely to rate their overall satisfaction with care as "very good" when compared with usual care counterparts (odds ratio=1.26; 95% CI, 1.05-1.52). In the analysis of patient-centered medical home elements, SMApatients rated their care as more accessible and more sensitive to their needs, whereas usual care patients reported greater satisfaction with physician communication and time spent during their appointment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, SMApatients appear more satisfied with their care relative to patients receiving usual care. SMAs may also improve access to care and deliver care that patients find to be sensitive to their needs. Further research should focus on enhancing patient-clinician communication within an SMA as this model of care becomes more widely adopted.
Authors: John C Scott; Douglas A Conner; Ingrid Venohr; Glenn Gade; Marlene McKenzie; Andrew M Kramer; Lucinda Bryant; Arne Beck Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Benjamin G Druss; Steven C Marcus; Mark Olfson; Terri Tanielian; Harold Alan Pincus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-01-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nerissa S Bauer; Nina Azer; Paula D Sullivan; Dorota Szczepaniak; Sarah M Stelzner; Stephen M Downs; Aaron E Carroll Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Jennifer K Raymond; Cari L Berget; Kimberly A Driscoll; Kaitlin Ketchum; Cynthia Cain; John F Fred Thomas Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Cari Berget; Jennifer Lindwall; Jacqueline J Shea; Georgeanna J Klingensmith; Barbara J Anderson; Cindy Cain; Jennifer K Raymond Journal: J Nurse Pract Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 0.767
Authors: John A Batsis; John A Naslund; Lydia E Gill; Rebecca K Masutani; Nayan Agarwal; Stephen J Bartels Journal: Gerontol Geriatr Med Date: 2016-11-21
Authors: Monika M Schmidt; Joan M Griffin; Pamela McCabe; Lynette Stuart-Mullen; Megan Branda; Thomas J OByrne; Margaret Bowers; Kathryn Trotter; Christopher McLeod Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Megan Rose McClain; Georgeanna J Klingensmith; Barbara Anderson; Cari Berget; Cindy Cain; Jacqueline Shea; Kristen Campbell; Laura Pyle; Jennifer K Raymond Journal: Diabetes Spectr Date: 2018-08
Authors: Joan M Griffin; Lynette G Stuart-Mullen; Monika M Schmidt; Pamela J McCabe; Thomas J O'Byrne; Megan E Branda; Christopher J McLeod Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Date: 2018-07-27