Literature DB >> 25024207

Infants' brain responses to speech suggest analysis by synthesis.

Patricia K Kuhl1, Rey R Ramírez2, Alexis Bosseler2, Jo-Fu Lotus Lin2, Toshiaki Imada2.   

Abstract

Historic theories of speech perception (Motor Theory and Analysis by Synthesis) invoked listeners' knowledge of speech production to explain speech perception. Neuroimaging data show that adult listeners activate motor brain areas during speech perception. In two experiments using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we investigated motor brain activation, as well as auditory brain activation, during discrimination of native and nonnative syllables in infants at two ages that straddle the developmental transition from language-universal to language-specific speech perception. Adults are also tested in Exp. 1. MEG data revealed that 7-mo-old infants activate auditory (superior temporal) as well as motor brain areas (Broca's area, cerebellum) in response to speech, and equivalently for native and nonnative syllables. However, in 11- and 12-mo-old infants, native speech activates auditory brain areas to a greater degree than nonnative, whereas nonnative speech activates motor brain areas to a greater degree than native speech. This double dissociation in 11- to 12-mo-old infants matches the pattern of results obtained in adult listeners. Our infant data are consistent with Analysis by Synthesis: auditory analysis of speech is coupled with synthesis of the motor plans necessary to produce the speech signal. The findings have implications for: (i) perception-action theories of speech perception, (ii) the impact of "motherese" on early language learning, and (iii) the "social-gating" hypothesis and humans' development of social understanding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain imaging; phonetic perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25024207      PMCID: PMC4128155          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1410963111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  69 in total

1.  Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Jeremy I Skipper; Virginie van Wassenhove; Howard C Nusbaum; Steven L Small
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

3.  Infant speech perception activates Broca's area: a developmental magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Toshiaki Imada; Yang Zhang; Marie Cheour; Samu Taulu; Antti Ahonen; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 4.  Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Functional organization of perisylvian activation during presentation of sentences in preverbal infants.

Authors:  Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Lucie Hertz-Pannier; Jessica Dubois; Sébastien Mériaux; Alexis Roche; Mariano Sigman; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Neural mirroring mechanisms and imitation in human infants.

Authors:  Peter J Marshall; Andrew N Meltzoff
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The bimodal perception of speech in infancy.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; A N Meltzoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements.

Authors:  S Taulu; J Simola
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Foundations for a new science of learning.

Authors:  Andrew N Meltzoff; Patricia K Kuhl; Javier Movellan; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  38 in total

1.  Sensorimotor influences on speech perception in infancy.

Authors:  Alison G Bruderer; D Kyle Danielson; Padmapriya Kandhadai; Janet F Werker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Role of the motor system in language knowledge.

Authors:  Iris Berent; Anna-Katharine Brem; Xu Zhao; Erica Seligson; Hong Pan; Jane Epstein; Emily Stern; Albert M Galaburda; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging.

Authors:  Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Why repetition? Repetitive babbling, auditory feedback, and cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Mary K Fagan
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2015-05-15

5.  QnAs with Patricia Kuhl.

Authors:  Patricia Kuhl; Prashant Nair
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Asymmetries in unimodal visual vowel perception: The roles of oral-facial kinematics, orientation, and configuration.

Authors:  Matthew Masapollo; Linda Polka; Lucie Ménard; Lauren Franklin; Mark Tiede; James Morgan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Touching lips and hearing fingers: effector-specific congruency between tactile and auditory stimulation modulates N1 amplitude and alpha desynchronization.

Authors:  Guannan Shen; Andrew N Meltzoff; Peter J Marshall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Riitta Hari; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth Barnes; Richard Burgess; Nina Forss; Joachim Gross; Matti Hämäläinen; Ole Jensen; Ryusuke Kakigi; François Mauguière; Nobukatzu Nakasato; Aina Puce; Gian-Luca Romani; Alfons Schnitzler; Samu Taulu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 9.  Language and thought are not the same thing: evidence from neuroimaging and neurological patients.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Rosemary Varley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 10.  Importance of body representations in social-cognitive development: New insights from infant brain science.

Authors:  Andrew N Meltzoff; Peter J Marshall
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.