Literature DB >> 25024155

Social organization and foraging success in Lasius neoniger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): behavioral and ecological aspects of recruitment communication.

J F Traniello1.   

Abstract

Live, moribund, or dead arthropods are gathered by Lasius neoniger through individual and social retrieval. 85% of the total biomass of prey (fresh weight) in the diet is cooperatively retrieved by groups of workers. Short-and long-range chemical recruitment signals coordinate cooperative foraging. Stort-range recruitment of workers to assist in the retrieval or defense of prey is achieved by simultaneous discharge of hindgut material and poison gland secretion. In long-range recruitment, workers discovering prey deposit a trail of hindgut material while returning to the nest. Hindgut pheromone both stimulates nestmates to leave the nest and orients them to the food source. Colony response is adjusted according to prey weight. Group retrieval of prey follows after a sufficient number of foragers have been recruited to move the prey. Rapid prey movement decreases the exposure of food sources to neighboring conspecific and interspecific competitors. The ability to move prey rapidly is limited to prey on the order of 130 mg or less in weight. The probability of interference during foraging and resource loss to competitors increases with increasing prey size, but the probability of loss is significantly less than the probability of interference for intermediate size prey (∼20 mg), which can be moved quickly. The foraging and recruitment behaviors of Lasius neoniger appear to have a prey size-dependent effectiveness which results in greater foraging success on prey of a relatively narrow size range above those prey that can be retrieved by solitary foragers.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 25024155     DOI: 10.1007/BF00388080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Territorial strategies in ants.

Authors:  B Hölldobler; C J Lumsden
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Interference strategy of Iridomyrmex pruinosum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) during foraging.

Authors:  Bert Hölldobler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Chemical interference competition by Monomorium minimum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Authors:  Eldridge S Adams; James F A Traniello
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Caste and ecology in the social insects.

Authors:  G F Oster; E O Wilson
Journal:  Monogr Popul Biol       Date:  1978

5.  [Chemical strategy during foraging in Solenopsis fugax Latr. and Monomorium pharaonis L.]

Authors:  Bert Hölldobler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  North American Invasion of the Tawny Crazy Ant (Nylanderia fulva) Is Enabled by Pheromonal Synergism from Two Separate Glands.

Authors:  Qing-He Zhang; Danny L McDonald; Doreen R Hoover; Jeffrey R Aldrich; Rodney G Schneidmiller
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Who is the top dog in ant communities? Resources, parasitoids, and multiple competitive hierarchies.

Authors:  Edward G LeBrun
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Tandem carrying, a new foraging strategy in ants: description, function, and adaptive significance relative to other described foraging strategies.

Authors:  Benoit Guénard; Jules Silverman
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-06-10

4.  Fast food in ant communities: how competing species find resources.

Authors:  Jessica M C Pearce-Duvet; Martin Moyano; Frederick R Adler; Donald H Feener
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Territory defense by the ant Azteca trigona: maintenance of an arboreal ant mosaic.

Authors:  Eldridge S Adams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Intra-and intercolony patterns of nest dispersion in the ant Lasius neoniger: correlations with territoriality and foraging ecology.

Authors:  James F A Traniello; Sally C Levings
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Food robbing in ants, a form of interference competition.

Authors:  Bert Hölldobler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Spatiotemporal resource distribution and foraging strategies of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Authors:  Michele Lanan
Journal:  Myrmecol News       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.514

9.  Sympatry and allopatry in two desert ant sister species: how do Cataglyphis bicolor and C. savignyi coexist?

Authors:  B Dietrich; R Wehner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 3.225

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.