Literature DB >> 25024104

Does the temporal mismatch hypothesis match in boreal populations?

Emma Vatka1, Seppo Rytkönen, Markku Orell.   

Abstract

The temporal mismatch hypothesis suggests that fitness is related to the degree of temporal synchrony between the energetic needs of the offspring and their food supply. The hypothesis has been a basis in studying the influence of climate warming on nature. This study enhances the knowledge on prevalence of temporal mismatches and their consequences in boreal populations, and questions the role of the temporal mismatch hypothesis as the principal explanation for the evolution of timing of breeding. To test this, we examined if synchrony with caterpillar prey or timing of breeding per se better explains reproductive output in North European parid populations. We compared responses of temperate-origin species, the great tit (Parus major) and the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus), and a boreal species, the willow tit (Poecile montanus). We found that phenologies of caterpillars and great tits, but not of blue tits, have advanced during the past decades. Phenologies correlated with spring temperatures that may function as cues about the timing of the food peak for great and blue tits. The breeding of great and blue tits and their caterpillar food remained synchronous. Synchrony explained breeding success better than timing of breeding alone. However, the synchrony effect arose only in certain conditions, such as with high caterpillar abundances or high breeding densities. Breeding before good synchrony seems advantageous at high latitudes, especially in the willow tit. Thus, the temporal mismatch hypothesis appears insufficient in explaining the evolution of timing of breeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25024104     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-3022-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  21 in total

1.  Variable responses to large-scale climate change in European Parus populations.

Authors:  Marcel E Visser; Frank Adriaensen; Johan H Van Balen; Jacques Blondel; André A Dhondt; Stefan Van Dongen; Chris Du Feu; Elena V Ivankina; Anvar B Kerimov; Jenny De Laet; Erik Matthysen; Robin McCleery; Markku Orell; David L Thomson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Control of the annual cycle in birds: endocrine constraints and plasticity in response to ecological variability.

Authors:  Alistair Dawson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  A review of climate-driven mismatches between interdependent phenophases in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly; Amelia Caffarra; Bridget F O'Neill
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  A comparison of three sampling techniques to estimate the population size of caterpillars in trees.

Authors:  H S Zandt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Timing in a fluctuating environment: environmental variability and asymmetric fitness curves can lead to adaptively mismatched avian reproduction.

Authors:  Marjolein E Lof; Thomas E Reed; John M McNamara; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology.

Authors:  M E Visser; L J Holleman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Changing climate and the phenological response of great tit and collared flycatcher populations in floodplain forest ecosystems in Central Europe.

Authors:  Zdenek Bauer; Miroslav Trnka; Jana Bauerová; Martin Mozný; Petr Stepánek; Lenka Bartosová; Zdenek Zalud
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.787

8.  Ambient temperature effects on photo induced gonadal cycles and hormonal secretion patterns in Great Tits from three different breeding latitudes.

Authors:  Bengt Silverin; John Wingfield; Karl-Arne Stokkan; Renato Massa; Antero Järvinen; Nils-Ake Andersson; Marcel Lambrechts; Alberto Sorace; Donald Blomqvist
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Phenological mismatch strongly affects individual fitness but not population demography in a woodland passerine.

Authors:  Thomas E Reed; Stephanie Jenouvrier; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Spring vegetation phenology is a robust predictor of breeding date across broad landscapes: a multi-site approach using the Corsican blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus).

Authors:  Patrice Bourgault; Don Thomas; Philippe Perret; Jacques Blondel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  11 in total

1.  The effect of climate change on the duration of avian breeding seasons: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucyna Halupka; Konrad Halupka
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A positive relationship between spring temperature and productivity in 20 songbird species in the boreal zone.

Authors:  Kalle Meller; Markus Piha; Anssi V Vähätalo; Aleksi Lehikoinen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of spring temperatures on the strength of selection on timing of reproduction in a long-distance migratory bird.

Authors:  Marcel E Visser; Phillip Gienapp; Arild Husby; Michael Morrisey; Iván de la Hera; Francisco Pulido; Christiaan Both
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Comparing two measures of phenological synchrony in a predator-prey interaction: Simpler works better.

Authors:  Jip J C Ramakers; Phillip Gienapp; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  The influence of climate variability on demographic rates of avian Afro-palearctic migrants.

Authors:  Tomáš Telenský; Petr Klvaňa; Miroslav Jelínek; Jaroslav Cepák; Jiří Reif
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Impacts of local adaptation of forest trees on associations with herbivorous insects: implications for adaptive forest management.

Authors:  Frazer H Sinclair; Graham N Stone; James A Nicholls; Stephen Cavers; Melanie Gibbs; Philip Butterill; Stefanie Wagner; Alexis Ducousso; Sophie Gerber; Rémy J Petit; Antoine Kremer; Karsten Schönrogge
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Different Ultimate Factors Define Timing of Breeding in Two Related Species.

Authors:  Veli-Matti Pakanen; Markku Orell; Emma Vatka; Seppo Rytkönen; Juli Broggi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interspecific variation in the relationship between clutch size, laying date and intensity of urbanization in four species of hole-nesting birds.

Authors:  Marie Vaugoyeau; Frank Adriaensen; Alexandr Artemyev; Jerzy Bańbura; Emilio Barba; Clotilde Biard; Jacques Blondel; Zihad Bouslama; Jean-Charles Bouvier; Jordi Camprodon; Francesco Cecere; Anne Charmantier; Motti Charter; Mariusz Cichoń; Camillo Cusimano; Dorota Czeszczewik; Virginie Demeyrier; Blandine Doligez; Claire Doutrelant; Anna Dubiec; Marcel Eens; Tapio Eeva; Bruno Faivre; Peter N Ferns; Jukka T Forsman; Eduardo García-Del-Rey; Aya Goldshtein; Anne E Goodenough; Andrew G Gosler; Arnaud Grégoire; Lars Gustafsson; Iga Harnist; Ian R Hartley; Philipp Heeb; Shelley A Hinsley; Paul Isenmann; Staffan Jacob; Rimvydas Juškaitis; Erkki Korpimäki; Indrikis Krams; Toni Laaksonen; Marcel M Lambrechts; Bernard Leclercq; Esa Lehikoinen; Olli Loukola; Arne Lundberg; Mark C Mainwaring; Raivo Mänd; Bruno Massa; Tomasz D Mazgajski; Santiago Merino; Cezary Mitrus; Mikko Mönkkönen; Xavier Morin; Ruedi G Nager; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Sven G Nilsson; Ana C Norte; Markku Orell; Philippe Perret; Christopher M Perrins; Carla S Pimentel; Rianne Pinxten; Heinz Richner; Hugo Robles; Seppo Rytkönen; Juan Carlos Senar; Janne T Seppänen; Luis Pascoal da Silva; Tore Slagsvold; Tapio Solonen; Alberto Sorace; Martyn J Stenning; Piotr Tryjanowski; Mikael von Numers; Wieslaw Walankiewicz; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Nightjars may adjust breeding phenology to compensate for mismatches between moths and moonlight.

Authors:  Philina A English; Joseph J Nocera; David J Green
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Northward expanding resident species benefit from warming winters through increased foraging rates and predator vigilance.

Authors:  Veli-Matti Pakanen; Eveliina Ahonen; Esa Hohtola; Seppo Rytkönen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.