Literature DB >> 25023959

Mathematical analysis of spontaneous emergence of cell polarity.

Wing-Cheong Lo1, Hay-Oak Park, Ching-Shan Chou.   

Abstract

Cell polarization, in which intracellular substances are asymmetrically distributed, enables cells to carry out specialized functions. While cell polarity is often induced by intracellular or extracellular spatial cues, spontaneous polarization (the so-called symmetry breaking) may also occur in the absence of spatial cues. Many computational models have been used to investigate the mechanisms of symmetry breaking, and it was proved that spontaneous polarization occurs when the lateral diffusion of inactive signaling molecules is much faster than that of active signaling molecules. This conclusion leaves an important question of how, as observed in many biological systems, cell polarity emerges when active and inactive membrane-bound molecules diffuse at similar rates while cycling between cytoplasm and membrane takes place. The recent studies of Rätz and Röger showed that, when the cytosolic and membrane diffusion are very different, spontaneous polarization is possible even if the membrane-bound species diffuse at the same rate. In this paper, we formulate a two-equation non-local reaction-diffusion model with general forms of positive feedback. We apply Turing stability analysis to identify parameter conditions for achieving cell polarization. Our results show that spontaneous polarization can be achieved within some parameter ranges even when active and inactive signaling molecules diffuse at similar rates. In addition, different forms of positive feedback are explored to show that a non-local molecule-mediated feedback is important for sharping the localization as well as giving rise to fast dynamics to achieve robust polarization.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25023959     DOI: 10.1007/s11538-014-9982-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  8 in total

1.  Regulation of Cdc42 polarization by the Rsr1 GTPase and Rga1, a Cdc42 GTPase-activating protein, in budding yeast.

Authors:  Mid Eum Lee; Wing-Cheong Lo; Kristi E Miller; Ching-Shan Chou; Hay-Oak Park
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of a reaction-diffusion model of pollen tube tip growth.

Authors:  Chenwei Tian; Qingyan Shi; Xinping Cui; Jingzhe Guo; Zhenbiao Yang; Junping Shi
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  A modeling study of budding yeast colony formation and its relationship to budding pattern and aging.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; Wing-Cheong Lo; Ching-Shan Chou
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 4.  Evolutionary dynamics in the fungal polarization network, a mechanistic perspective.

Authors:  Eveline T Diepeveen; Leila Iñigo de la Cruz; Liedewij Laan
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-08-15

Review 5.  Many roads to symmetry breaking: molecular mechanisms and theoretical models of yeast cell polarity.

Authors:  Andrew B Goryachev; Marcin Leda
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 6.  PAR-Complex and Crumbs Function During Photoreceptor Morphogenesis and Retinal Degeneration.

Authors:  Franck Pichaud
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.505

7.  Temporal regulation of cell polarity via the interaction of the Ras GTPase Rsr1 and the scaffold protein Bem1.

Authors:  Kristi E Miller; Wing-Cheong Lo; Ching-Shan Chou; Hay-Oak Park
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  Fine-tuning the orientation of the polarity axis by Rga1, a Cdc42 GTPase-activating protein.

Authors:  Kristi E Miller; Wing-Cheong Lo; Mid Eum Lee; Pil Jung Kang; Hay-Oak Park
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.138

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.