Olga van der Baan-Slootweg1, Marc A Benninga2, Anita Beelen3, Job van der Palen4, Christine Tamminga-Smeulders5, Jan G P Tijssen6, Wim M C van Aalderen2. 1. Pediatric Department, Merem Childhood Obesity Centre Heideheuvel, Hilversum, the Netherlands2Pediatric Department, Academic Medical Center, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2. Pediatric Department, Academic Medical Center, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3. Pediatric Department, Merem Childhood Obesity Centre Heideheuvel, Hilversum, the Netherlands3Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Research Methodology, Measurement, and Data Analysis, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands5Medical School Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. 5. Pediatric Department, Merem Childhood Obesity Centre Heideheuvel, Hilversum, the Netherlands. 6. Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Severe childhood obesity has become a major health problem, and effective, evidence-based interventions are needed. The relative effectiveness of inpatient compared with ambulatory treatment remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an inpatient treatment program is more effective than an ambulatory treatment program at achieving a sustained weight loss in children and adolescents with severe obesity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up at a tertiary referral center for pediatric obesity in the Netherlands. We recruited 90 children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years with severe obesity (body mass index [BMI] z score, ≥3.0 or >2.3 with obesity-related health problems). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to an inpatient (6 months of hospitalization on working days) or an ambulatory (12 days of hospital visits at increasing intervals during a 6-month period) treatment program. Both treatment programs involved an intensive, family-based, lifestyle intervention, including exercise, nutritional education, and behavior modification for the patients and their caregiver(s). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in BMI z score. Secondary outcomes included fasting insulin, fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour plasma glucose, and lipid levels, insulin sensitivity, liver function test results, waist circumference, blood pressure, body composition, and aerobic fitness (peak oxygen consumption, Vo₂). Outcomes were analyzed by intention to treat. RESULTS: Immediately after treatment, reductions in the BMI z score were significantly larger for the inpatient than the ambulatory groups (mean [SE] difference, -0.26 [0.12; 95% CI, -0.59 to -0.01]; P = .04). Change from baseline for the BMI z score in the inpatient group was -18.0% (P = .001) immediately after treatment, -8.5% (P = .008) at 18 months, and -6.3% (P = .38) at 30 months; in the ambulatory group, changes from baseline were -10.5% (P = .001), -6.2% (P = .39), and -1.5% (P > .99), respectively. The favorable outcomes of the inpatient group could not be sustained at 12 and 24 months after treatment. In addition, significant differences in favor of the inpatient group immediately after treatment were found for levels of fasting insulin (-6.37 IU/L; P = .02), total cholesterol (-19.51 mg/dL; P = .01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-13.48 mg/dL; P = .03), and triglycerides (-25.39 mg/dL; P = .01), and insulin sensitivity (-1.37; P = .02), fat mass (-3.31%; P = .03), and peak Vo₂ (378.2 mL/min; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In severely obese children and adolescents, inpatient treatment was superior to ambulatory treatment immediately after treatment, but effects were not sustained at long-term follow-up. These findings stress the need to further study maintenance strategies for sustainable weight loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR1172.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Severe childhood obesity has become a major health problem, and effective, evidence-based interventions are needed. The relative effectiveness of inpatient compared with ambulatory treatment remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an inpatient treatment program is more effective than an ambulatory treatment program at achieving a sustained weight loss in children and adolescents with severe obesity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up at a tertiary referral center for pediatric obesity in the Netherlands. We recruited 90 children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years with severe obesity (body mass index [BMI] z score, ≥3.0 or >2.3 with obesity-related health problems). INTERVENTIONS:Patients were randomly assigned to an inpatient (6 months of hospitalization on working days) or an ambulatory (12 days of hospital visits at increasing intervals during a 6-month period) treatment program. Both treatment programs involved an intensive, family-based, lifestyle intervention, including exercise, nutritional education, and behavior modification for the patients and their caregiver(s). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in BMI z score. Secondary outcomes included fasting insulin, fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour plasma glucose, and lipid levels, insulin sensitivity, liver function test results, waist circumference, blood pressure, body composition, and aerobic fitness (peak oxygen consumption, Vo₂). Outcomes were analyzed by intention to treat. RESULTS: Immediately after treatment, reductions in the BMI z score were significantly larger for the inpatient than the ambulatory groups (mean [SE] difference, -0.26 [0.12; 95% CI, -0.59 to -0.01]; P = .04). Change from baseline for the BMI z score in the inpatient group was -18.0% (P = .001) immediately after treatment, -8.5% (P = .008) at 18 months, and -6.3% (P = .38) at 30 months; in the ambulatory group, changes from baseline were -10.5% (P = .001), -6.2% (P = .39), and -1.5% (P > .99), respectively. The favorable outcomes of the inpatient group could not be sustained at 12 and 24 months after treatment. In addition, significant differences in favor of the inpatient group immediately after treatment were found for levels of fasting insulin (-6.37 IU/L; P = .02), total cholesterol (-19.51 mg/dL; P = .01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-13.48 mg/dL; P = .03), and triglycerides (-25.39 mg/dL; P = .01), and insulin sensitivity (-1.37; P = .02), fat mass (-3.31%; P = .03), and peak Vo₂ (378.2 mL/min; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In severely obesechildren and adolescents, inpatient treatment was superior to ambulatory treatment immediately after treatment, but effects were not sustained at long-term follow-up. These findings stress the need to further study maintenance strategies for sustainable weight loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR1172.
Authors: B G P Koot; O H van der Baan-Slootweg; S Vinke; A E Bohte; C L J Tamminga-Smeulders; P L M Jansen; J Stoker; M A Benninga Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Valentin Mocanu; Krista Lai; Jerry T Dang; Noah J Switzer; Daniel W Birch; Geoff D C Ball; Shahzeer Karmali Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-02-06 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Marc P Michalsky; Thomas H Inge; Todd M Jenkins; Changchun Xie; Anita Courcoulas; Michael Helmrath; Mary L Brandt; Carroll M Harmon; Mike Chen; John B Dixon; Elaine M Urbina Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jeanne McPhee; Eve Khlyavich Freidl; Julia Eicher; Jeffrey L Zitsman; Michael J Devlin; Tom Hildebrandt; Robyn Sysko Journal: Eur Eat Disord Rev Date: 2015-09-17
Authors: Janey S A Pratt; Allen Browne; Nancy T Browne; Matias Bruzoni; Megan Cohen; Ashish Desai; Thomas Inge; Bradley C Linden; Samer G Mattar; Marc Michalsky; David Podkameni; Kirk W Reichard; Fatima Cody Stanford; Meg H Zeller; Jeffrey Zitsman Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Bryce A Basques; Daniel D Bohl; Nicholas S Golinvaux; Brian G Smith; Jonathan N Grauer Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Thomas H Inge; Anita P Courcoulas; Todd M Jenkins; Marc P Michalsky; Michael A Helmrath; Mary L Brandt; Carroll M Harmon; Meg H Zeller; Mike K Chen; Stavra A Xanthakos; Mary Horlick; C Ralph Buncher Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 91.245